NameCensus.

UK surname

Rawbone

In the 1881 census there were 183 people recorded with the Rawbone surname, ranking it #13,596 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 227, ranked #17,992, down from #13,596 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Bristol City: St Mary Redcliff, London parishes and Wellesbourne. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Warwick, Caerphilly and South Gloucestershire.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Rawbone is 264 in 2002. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 24.0%.

1881 census count

183

Ranked #13,596

Modern count

227

2016, ranked #17,992

Peak year

2002

264 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Rawbone had 183 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #13,596 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 227 in 2016, ranked #17,992.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 207 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Challenged Communities.

Rawbone surname distribution map

The map shows where the Rawbone surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Rawbone surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Rawbone over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 172 #11,682
1861 historical 174 #13,483
1881 historical 183 #13,596
1891 historical 202 #14,808
1901 historical 179 #16,227
1911 historical 207 #14,635
1997 modern 231 #16,049
1998 modern 241 #16,065
1999 modern 245 #16,012
2000 modern 263 #15,228
2001 modern 261 #15,066
2002 modern 264 #15,236
2003 modern 246 #15,769
2004 modern 243 #16,004
2005 modern 243 #15,943
2006 modern 232 #16,600
2007 modern 234 #16,706
2008 modern 231 #16,973
2009 modern 237 #17,052
2010 modern 248 #16,886
2011 modern 240 #17,093
2012 modern 236 #17,187
2013 modern 241 #17,202
2014 modern 246 #17,079
2015 modern 236 #17,477
2016 modern 227 #17,992

Geography

Back to top

Where Rawbones are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Bristol City: St Mary Redcliff, London parishes, Wellesbourne, Stockton and Lambeth. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Warwick, Caerphilly, South Gloucestershire, Stratford-on-Avon and Rugby. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Bristol City: St Mary Redcliff Gloucestershire
2 London parishes London 3
3 Wellesbourne Warwickshire
4 Stockton Warwickshire
5 Lambeth London (South Districts)

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Warwick 007 Warwick
2 Caerphilly 024 Caerphilly
3 South Gloucestershire 026 South Gloucestershire
4 Stratford-on-Avon 004 Stratford-on-Avon
5 Rugby 004 Rugby

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Rawbone

These lists show first names that appear often with the Rawbone surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Rawbone

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Rawbone, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Baseline UK

Group

Challenged Communities

Nationally, the Rawbone surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Challenged Communities, within Baseline UK. This does not mean every Rawbone household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Residents of these neighbourhoods typically live in households with dependent children, and there are fewer-than-average residents of normal retirement age or over. Identification with ethnic minorities, particularly Black, or Mixed or Multiple ethnicities is common. The rate of Christian religious affiliation is low. Housing predominantly consists of semi-detached houses, along with a significant number of terraced properties and flats. Overcrowded social housing is common, and private renting occurs at average UK levels. Those in employment work mainly in caring leisure and other services; process, plant and machine operation; or elementary occupations. Unemployment is high, and few individuals have degree level qualifications. Many of these neighbourhoods occur in commuter towns or less accessible areas of larger towns and cities.

Wider pattern

This Supergroup exemplifies the broad base to the UK’s social structure, encompassing as it does the average or modal levels of many neighbourhood characteristics, including all housing tenures, a range of levels of educational attainment and religious affiliations, and a variety of pre-retirement age structures. Yet, in combination, these mixes are each distinctive of the parts of the UK. Overall, terraced houses and flats are the most prevalent, as is employment in intermediate or low-skilled occupations. However, this Supergroup is also characterised by above average levels of unemployment and lower levels of use of English as the main language. Many neighbourhoods occur in south London and the UK’s other major urban centres.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs

Group

London Fringe

Within London, Rawbone is most associated with areas classed as London Fringe, part of Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Predominantly located in neighbourhoods on the outskirts of Greater London, residents of these neighbourhoods typically have their highest qualifications below degree (Level 4) level, with those still in work engaged in skilled trades and occupations in distribution, hotels and restaurants. There is low ethnic diversity in these neighbourhoods and high levels of Christian religious affiliation. Detached or terraced houses predominate, often with spare rooms.

Wider London pattern

The age distribution of these neighbourhoods is skewed towards the middle-aged and old, although few residents live alone or in communal establishments and numbers of dependent children are around average. Owner occupation is the norm, as is residence in detached or semi-detached houses. Residential densities are low and many households have spare rooms. Most residents were born in the UK and, aside from some identifying as members of Chinese or Indian ethnicities, identify as White. Mixed ethnicity households are rare. Incidence of married couples is higher than average and few individuals have never been married. A large proportion of individuals still in employment work in administrative and secretarial occupations, or in the construction industry. Few residents are students, and many households own more than one car.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Rawbone is most concentrated in decile 2 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the less healthy end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

2
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Rawbone falls in decile 9 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the less deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

9
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Rawbone is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 60-70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

9
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Rawbone, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Rawbone families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Rawbone surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Warwickshire leads with 70 Rawbones recorded in 1881 and an index of 15.55x.

County Total Index
Warwickshire 70 15.55x
Surrey 27 3.10x
Middlesex 26 1.46x
Gloucestershire 21 6.00x
Worcestershire 9 3.86x
Staffordshire 8 1.33x
Hertfordshire 5 4.06x
Yorkshire 5 0.28x
Lincolnshire 4 1.40x
Hampshire 3 0.82x
Oxfordshire 3 2.72x
Kent 2 0.33x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Stockton in Warwickshire leads with 21 Rawbones recorded in 1881 and an index of 5000.00x.

Place Total Index
Stockton 21 5000.00x
Bitton Oldland 17 474.86x
Lambeth 15 9.64x
Mile End Old Town 10 35.49x
Old Stratford 10 392.16x
Newington 9 13.65x
Yardley 9 151.01x
Bourton On Dunsmore 6 3333.33x
Ackworth 5 367.65x
Aston 5 4.03x
Knowle 5 537.63x
Tipton 5 27.10x
Warwick St Nicholas 5 151.52x
Watford 5 52.41x
Mile End New Town 4 163.93x
St Martin Lincoln 4 150.94x
St Marylebone London 4 4.20x
Portsea 3 4.18x
Solihull 3 92.59x
Stratford On Avon 3 120.00x
Wellesbourne Hastings 3 697.67x
Bristol St George 2 12.35x
Deptford St Paul 2 4.26x
Ealing 2 12.54x
Moreton Morrell 2 1250.00x
Southam 2 183.49x
Spitalfields London 2 14.89x
Tooting Graveney 2 82.64x
Beddington 1 29.76x
Berkswich 1 270.27x
Birmingham 1 0.67x
Bristol St Philip Jacob 1 3.03x
Fulbrook 1 1428.57x
Islington London 1 0.58x
Kensington London 1 1.01x
Lapworth 1 238.10x
Leamington Priors 1 9.03x
Lillington 1 172.41x
Oxford St Aldate 1 86.21x
Oxford St Clement 1 35.97x
Oxford St Giles 1 19.01x
Paddington London 1 1.52x
Rocester 1 133.33x
Sedgley 1 4.47x
Siston 1 158.73x
St Martin In Fields 1 9.35x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Rawbone surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Sarah 15
Elizabeth 10
Mary 8
Emily 5
Emma 5
Ann 4
Annie 4
Edith 3
A. 2
Amy 2
Susannah 2
Ada 1
Agnes 1
Anne 1
Betsy 1
Charles 1
Clara 1
Constance 1
Elizth. 1
Ellen 1
Elsie 1
Ethel 1
Fanny 1
Frances 1
George 1
Georgiana 1
Grace 1
Hannah 1
Harriett 1
Harrt. 1
Janet 1
Jemima 1
Jessie 1
Julia 1
Kate 1
Louisa 1
Malinda 1
Margaret 1
Maria 1
Martha 1
May 1
Rebbecca 1
Selina 1
Sophia 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Rawbone surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Thomas 9
William 9
John 8
George 7
Charles 6
Joseph 5
Samuel 5
Arthur 4
Alfred 3
Edward 3
Frederick 3
Walter 3
Albert 2
Edwin 2
Henry 2
Job 2
Aaron 1
Ambrose 1
Aubrey 1
Francis 1
Frank 1
Fredk. 1
Geo. 1
Harold 1
Hubert 1
James 1
Richard 1
Robert 1
Saml. 1
Sidney 1
Simon 1
Tolson 1
Willie 1

FAQ

Rawbone surname: questions and answers

How common was the Rawbone surname in 1881?

In 1881, 183 people were recorded with the Rawbone surname. That placed it at #13,596 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Rawbone surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 227 in 2016. That gives Rawbone a modern rank of #17,992.

What does the Rawbone map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Rawbone bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.