NameCensus.

UK surname

Redknap

In the 1881 census there were 97 people recorded with the Redknap surname, ranking it #20,127 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 118, ranked #27,873, down from #20,127 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to London parishes, Richmond and Lambeth. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Tunbridge Wells, Cherwell and Rother.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Redknap is 137 in 1999. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 21.6%.

1881 census count

97

Ranked #20,127

Modern count

118

2016, ranked #27,873

Peak year

1999

137 bearers

Map years

5

1891 to 2016

Key insights

  • Redknap had 97 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #20,127 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 118 in 2016, ranked #27,873.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 119 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Challenged Communities.

Redknap surname distribution map

The map shows where the Redknap surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Redknap surname density by area, 2016 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Redknap over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 50 #24,274
1861 historical 35 #29,571
1881 historical 97 #20,127
1891 historical 105 #23,241
1901 historical 98 #23,119
1911 historical 119 #20,535
1997 modern 121 #24,019
1998 modern 136 #23,013
1999 modern 137 #23,083
2000 modern 136 #23,155
2001 modern 130 #23,457
2002 modern 134 #23,492
2003 modern 129 #23,783
2004 modern 123 #24,679
2005 modern 116 #25,564
2006 modern 121 #25,133
2007 modern 123 #25,208
2008 modern 123 #25,505
2009 modern 119 #26,637
2010 modern 125 #26,448
2011 modern 125 #26,220
2012 modern 121 #26,829
2013 modern 115 #28,176
2014 modern 119 #27,813
2015 modern 121 #27,405
2016 modern 118 #27,873

Geography

Back to top

Where Redknaps are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around London parishes, Richmond, Lambeth and Kingston-on-Thames. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Tunbridge Wells, Cherwell, Rother, West Oxfordshire and Richmond upon Thames. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 London parishes London 1
2 Richmond Surrey
3 London parishes London 3
4 Lambeth London (South Districts)
5 Kingston-on-Thames Surrey

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Tunbridge Wells 011 Tunbridge Wells
2 Cherwell 017 Cherwell
3 Rother 001 Rother
4 West Oxfordshire 006 West Oxfordshire
5 Richmond upon Thames 020 Richmond upon Thames

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Redknap

These lists show first names that appear often with the Redknap surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Redknap

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Redknap, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Baseline UK

Group

Challenged Communities

Nationally, the Redknap surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Challenged Communities, within Baseline UK. This does not mean every Redknap household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Residents of these neighbourhoods typically live in households with dependent children, and there are fewer-than-average residents of normal retirement age or over. Identification with ethnic minorities, particularly Black, or Mixed or Multiple ethnicities is common. The rate of Christian religious affiliation is low. Housing predominantly consists of semi-detached houses, along with a significant number of terraced properties and flats. Overcrowded social housing is common, and private renting occurs at average UK levels. Those in employment work mainly in caring leisure and other services; process, plant and machine operation; or elementary occupations. Unemployment is high, and few individuals have degree level qualifications. Many of these neighbourhoods occur in commuter towns or less accessible areas of larger towns and cities.

Wider pattern

This Supergroup exemplifies the broad base to the UK’s social structure, encompassing as it does the average or modal levels of many neighbourhood characteristics, including all housing tenures, a range of levels of educational attainment and religious affiliations, and a variety of pre-retirement age structures. Yet, in combination, these mixes are each distinctive of the parts of the UK. Overall, terraced houses and flats are the most prevalent, as is employment in intermediate or low-skilled occupations. However, this Supergroup is also characterised by above average levels of unemployment and lower levels of use of English as the main language. Many neighbourhoods occur in south London and the UK’s other major urban centres.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Young Families and Mainstream Employment

Group

Terraced and Semi-Detached Suburbs

Within London, Redknap is most associated with areas classed as Terraced and Semi-Detached Suburbs, part of Young Families and Mainstream Employment. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Mainly concentrated in suburban areas, these terraced and semi-detached developments are less overcrowded than the Supergroup average, and resident households are more likely to own two or more cars. There are fewer residents aged 25-44, and a larger share of residents employed in administrative and secretarial occupations. Residents are more likely to have been born in the UK, less likely to have been born in the EU or Africa, and much less likely to self-identify as Bangladeshi.

Wider London pattern

Many families in these neighbourhoods have young children. Housing is principally in the social rented sector, in terraced or semi-detached units. While over-all residential densities are low, overcrowding is also prevalent locally. Residents are drawn from a range of ethnic minorities, with many identifying as Black and above average numbers born in Africa. Numbers identifying as of Chinese, Indian or White ethnicity are below average. Levels of proficiency in English are below average. Levels of separation or divorce and incidence of disability are both above average. Education is typically limited to Level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. Few residents work in professional or managerial occupations but the employment structure is otherwise diverse: it includes skilled trades, caring, leisure and other service occupations, sales and customer service occupations, construction, and work as process, plant, and machine operatives.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Redknap is most concentrated in decile 3 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the less healthy end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

3
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Redknap falls in decile 10 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the less deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

10
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Redknap is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 60-70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

9
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Redknap, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Redknap families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Redknap surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Middlesex leads with 38 Redknaps recorded in 1881 and an index of 4.02x.

County Total Index
Middlesex 38 4.02x
Surrey 31 6.73x
Buckinghamshire 10 17.49x
Oxfordshire 10 17.12x
Sussex 4 2.51x
Hampshire 2 1.03x
Essex 1 0.54x
Hertfordshire 1 1.53x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Twickenham in Middlesex leads with 25 Redknaps recorded in 1881 and an index of 615.76x.

Place Total Index
Twickenham 25 615.76x
Richmond 15 232.20x
Bromley London 13 62.47x
Great Marlow 10 649.35x
Kirtlington 10 4347.83x
Lambeth 7 8.49x
Brighton 4 12.43x
Egham 4 141.34x
Kingston On Thames 2 18.07x
Long Ditton 2 266.67x
Ryde 2 47.96x
Camberwell 1 1.66x
Hertford St John 1 103.09x
West Ham 1 2.43x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Redknap surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Redknap surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Henry 4
William 4
Frank 3
John 3
Alfred 2
Arthur 2
George 2
Herbert 2
Joseph 2
Walter 2
Albert 1
Amos 1
Charles 1
Edward 1
Edwd.W. 1
Enos 1
Francis 1
Fredk.C. 1
Harry 1
Levi 1
Percy 1
Richard 1
Robert 1

Top occupations

Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in Redknap households.

FAQ

Redknap surname: questions and answers

How common was the Redknap surname in 1881?

In 1881, 97 people were recorded with the Redknap surname. That placed it at #20,127 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Redknap surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 118 in 2016. That gives Redknap a modern rank of #27,873.

What does the Redknap map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Redknap bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.