NameCensus.

UK surname

Riddock

In the 1881 census there were 71 people recorded with the Riddock surname, ranking it #23,517 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 134, ranked #25,636, down from #23,517 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Inveresk, London parishes and Gateshead. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Sauchie, Alloa South and East and Tullibody South.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Riddock is 147 in 2010. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 88.7%.

1881 census count

71

Ranked #23,517

Modern count

134

2016, ranked #25,636

Peak year

2010

147 bearers

Map years

5

1891 to 2016

Key insights

  • Riddock had 71 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #23,517 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 134 in 2016, ranked #25,636.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 141 in 1901.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Established but Challenged.

Riddock surname distribution map

The map shows where the Riddock surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Riddock surname density by area, 2016 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Riddock over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 36 #26,838
1861 historical 73 #24,492
1881 historical 71 #23,517
1891 historical 132 #19,976
1901 historical 141 #18,718
1911 historical 54 #27,423
1997 modern 115 #24,834
1998 modern 114 #25,589
1999 modern 112 #26,044
2000 modern 109 #26,381
2001 modern 109 #26,059
2002 modern 110 #26,412
2003 modern 116 #25,415
2004 modern 118 #25,317
2005 modern 117 #25,433
2006 modern 121 #25,133
2007 modern 123 #25,208
2008 modern 128 #24,901
2009 modern 129 #25,314
2010 modern 147 #23,809
2011 modern 137 #24,716
2012 modern 133 #25,187
2013 modern 130 #26,074
2014 modern 136 #25,452
2015 modern 137 #25,226
2016 modern 134 #25,636

Geography

Back to top

Where Riddocks are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Inveresk, London parishes, Gateshead, Clee and New Windsor, Clewer. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Sauchie, Alloa South and East, Tullibody South, Tullibody North and Glenochil and Carnoustie West. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Inveresk Edinburgh
2 London parishes London 3
3 Gateshead Durham
4 Clee Lincolnshire
5 New Windsor, Clewer Berkshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Sauchie Clackmannanshire
2 Alloa South and East Clackmannanshire
3 Tullibody South Clackmannanshire
4 Tullibody North and Glenochil Clackmannanshire
5 Carnoustie West Angus

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Riddock

These lists show first names that appear often with the Riddock surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Riddock

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Riddock, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce

Group

Established but Challenged

Nationally, the Riddock surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Established but Challenged, within Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce. This does not mean every Riddock household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Many households in these neighbourhoods comprise separated or divorced single parents with dependent children. Residents are typically born in the UK, and these neighbourhoods have relatively few members of ethnic minorities. The prevalence of children, their parents and those at or above normal retirement age, suggests neighbourhood structures may be long-established. Levels of unpaid care are high, and long-term disability is more common than in the Supergroup as a whole. Use of the social rented sector is common, often in terraced houses. Levels of overcrowding are above the Supergroup average. Unemployment is high, while those in work are employed in elementary occupations such as caring, leisure and customer services. Many residents have low level qualifications. Neighbourhood concentrations of this Group are found in the South Wales Valleys, Belfast, Londonderry and the Central Lowlands of Scotland.

Wider pattern

Living in terraced or semi-detached houses, residents of these neighbourhoods typically lack high levels of education and work in elementary or routine service occupations. Unemployment is above average. Residents are predominantly born in the UK, and residents are also predominantly from ethnic minorities. Social (but not private sector) rented sector housing is common. This Supergroup is found throughout the UK’s conurbations and industrial regions but is also an integral part of smaller towns.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Social Rented Sector Families with Children

Group

Social Rented Sector Pockets

Within London, Riddock is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector Pockets, part of Social Rented Sector Families with Children. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Found in pockets across London, residents are less likely to live in private sector rentals and fewer adults are students. Fewer individuals work in transport and communications occupations relative to the Supergroup average. More individuals identify as Black and were born in Africa.

Wider London pattern

Residents of these neighbourhoods include sizable numbers identifying with ethnicities originating outside Europe, particularly in Africa or Bangladesh. The proportion of residents identifying as White, Indian or Pakistani is well below the London average. Neighbourhood age profiles are skewed towards younger adults, and above average numbers of families have children. Rates of use of English at home are below average. Marriage rates are low, and levels of separation or divorce are above average. Housing is predominantly in flats, and renting in the social rented sector the norm - few residents are owner occupiers. Housing is often overcrowded, and neighbourhoods are amongst the most densely populated in London. Disability rates are above average, although levels of unpaid care provision are about average. Employment is in caring, leisure, other service occupations, sales and customer service, or process, plant, and machine operation. Part time working and full-time student study are common. Levels of unemployment are slightly above average. Most residents have only Level 1 or 2 educational qualifications or have completed apprenticeships.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Riddock is most concentrated in decile 6 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

6
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Riddock falls in decile 2 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

2
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Riddock is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Riddock, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Riddock families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Riddock surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Ayrshire leads with 15 Riddocks recorded in 1881 and an index of 27.40x.

County Total Index
Ayrshire 15 27.40x
Lancashire 10 1.15x
Kent 8 3.21x
Lanarkshire 8 3.38x
Midlothian 7 7.14x
Durham 5 2.30x
Middlesex 5 0.68x
Perthshire 4 12.18x
Royal Navy 4 45.87x
Suffolk 2 2.24x
Surrey 2 0.56x
Buckinghamshire 1 2.26x
Cheshire 1 0.62x
Westmorland 1 6.22x
Wigtownshire 1 10.30x
Yorkshire 1 0.14x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Bootle Cum Linacre in Lancashire leads with 9 Riddocks recorded in 1881 and an index of 130.62x.

Place Total Index
Bootle Cum Linacre 9 130.62x
New Monkland 8 114.45x
Girvan 7 510.95x
Plumstead 7 84.13x
Kilwinning 6 338.98x
Hedworth Monkton Jarrow 5 53.02x
Inveresk 5 188.68x
Auchterarder 4 434.78x
Limehouse London 4 49.81x
Royal Navy 4 53.69x
Ipswich St Clement 2 88.50x
Beddington 1 72.46x
Bradford 1 5.70x
Casterton 1 666.67x
Charlton Next Woolwich 1 38.46x
Edinburgh St Cuthberts 1 2.54x
Fenny Stratford 1 238.10x
Guildford St Nicholas 1 158.73x
Liberton 1 66.23x
Little Neston 1 384.62x
Monkton Prestwick 1 188.68x
Riccarton Hurlford 1 104.17x
St Paul Covent Garden 1 136.99x
Toxteth Park 1 3.40x
Whithorn 1 135.14x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Riddock surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Alice 2
Elizabeth 2
Ellen 1
Emma 1
Florence 1
Helen 1
Isabella 1
Jane 1
Margt. 1
Maria 1
Marion 1
Rosa 1
Sarah 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Riddock surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 5
James 4
Alexander 2
George 2
Richard 2
William 2
Abercrombie 1
Charles 1
Frederic 1
Frederick 1
Peter 1
Stanley 1
Wm. 1

Top occupations

Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in Riddock households.

FAQ

Riddock surname: questions and answers

How common was the Riddock surname in 1881?

In 1881, 71 people were recorded with the Riddock surname. That placed it at #23,517 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Riddock surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 134 in 2016. That gives Riddock a modern rank of #25,636.

What does the Riddock map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Riddock bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.