NameCensus.

UK surname

Sargeson

In the 1881 census there were 137 people recorded with the Sargeson surname, ranking it #16,358 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 261, ranked #16,309, up from #16,358 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Hull Holy Trinity, Hatfield, Fishlake, Thorne, Crowle (Eastoft) and Eckington. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Rotherham, Doncaster and East Riding of Yorkshire.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Sargeson is 271 in 2010. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 90.5%.

1881 census count

137

Ranked #16,358

Modern count

261

2016, ranked #16,309

Peak year

2010

271 bearers

Map years

8

1861 to 2016

Key insights

  • Sargeson had 137 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #16,358 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 261 in 2016, ranked #16,309.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 162 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Young Families in Industrial Towns.

Sargeson surname distribution map

The map shows where the Sargeson surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Sargeson surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Sargeson over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 87 #18,695
1861 historical 115 #18,880
1881 historical 137 #16,358
1891 historical 147 #18,592
1901 historical 161 #17,324
1911 historical 162 #17,003
1997 modern 228 #16,211
1998 modern 227 #16,754
1999 modern 246 #15,974
2000 modern 252 #15,659
2001 modern 255 #15,319
2002 modern 249 #15,855
2003 modern 246 #15,769
2004 modern 245 #15,894
2005 modern 256 #15,407
2006 modern 257 #15,448
2007 modern 255 #15,687
2008 modern 252 #15,984
2009 modern 260 #15,972
2010 modern 271 #15,856
2011 modern 271 #15,708
2012 modern 264 #15,904
2013 modern 264 #16,191
2014 modern 264 #16,288
2015 modern 263 #16,224
2016 modern 261 #16,309

Geography

Back to top

Where Sargesons are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Hull Holy Trinity, Hatfield, Fishlake, Thorne, Crowle (Eastoft), Eckington, Eccles and Sheffield. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Rotherham, Doncaster, East Riding of Yorkshire and Barnsley. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Hull Holy Trinity Yorkshire, East Riding
2 Hatfield, Fishlake, Thorne, Crowle (Eastoft) Yorkshire, West Riding
3 Eckington Derbyshire
4 Eccles Lancashire
5 Sheffield Yorkshire, West Riding

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Rotherham 008 Rotherham
2 Doncaster 003 Doncaster
3 East Riding of Yorkshire 022 East Riding of Yorkshire
4 Barnsley 004 Barnsley
5 East Riding of Yorkshire 005 East Riding of Yorkshire

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Sargeson

These lists show first names that appear often with the Sargeson surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Sargeson

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Sargeson, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce

Group

Young Families in Industrial Towns

Nationally, the Sargeson surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Young Families in Industrial Towns, within Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce. This does not mean every Sargeson household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These neighbourhoods house predominantly young, UK-born individuals identifying with a White ethnic group with dependent children. Long-term disability and unpaid care are prevalent, and religious affiliations are uncommon. Housing is terraced or semi-detached and social rented sector housing is the norm. Unemployment is above the Supergroup average, and employment is principally in elementary occupations, as process plant and machine operatives, or in caring and leisure services. Educational attainment is low. The group is scattered throughout former industrial towns in the Midlands and the South Wales Valleys.

Wider pattern

Living in terraced or semi-detached houses, residents of these neighbourhoods typically lack high levels of education and work in elementary or routine service occupations. Unemployment is above average. Residents are predominantly born in the UK, and residents are also predominantly from ethnic minorities. Social (but not private sector) rented sector housing is common. This Supergroup is found throughout the UK’s conurbations and industrial regions but is also an integral part of smaller towns.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Central Connected Professionals and Managers

Group

Senior Professionals

Within London, Sargeson is most associated with areas classed as Senior Professionals, part of Central Connected Professionals and Managers. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These very central neighbourhoods house residents whose ages are more skewed towards older age cohorts than elsewhere in the Supergroup. Few households have young children. Rates of illness are low. Indian ethnicity is rare compared to the Supergroup mean. Property under occupation is more common, despite the centrality of neighbourhoods, and more residents live in communal establishments than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

Adult residents of these neighbourhoods are typically aged 25 to 44, working full-time in professional, managerial or associate professional occupations. There are few families with dependent children. The predominantly Inner London neighbourhoods have an international character, including many residents born elsewhere in Europe alongside high numbers of individuals identifying as of Chinese ethnicity. Many individuals are never married, childless and/or living alone. Above average numbers of individuals, likely to be full-time students, live in communal establishments. Elsewhere, privately rented flats are the dominant housing type. Residents of these areas are well-qualified, with a significant number holding Level 4 or above qualifications. There is a correspondingly high level of individuals employed full-time in professional, managerial and associated professional or technical occupations. Employing industries are financial, real estate, professional, administration, and, to a lesser degree, transport and communications. Unemployment is uncommon.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Sargeson is most concentrated in decile 6 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

6
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Sargeson falls in decile 1 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

1
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Sargeson is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Sargeson, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Sargeson families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Sargeson surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Yorkshire leads with 71 Sargesons recorded in 1881 and an index of 5.36x.

County Total Index
Yorkshire 71 5.36x
Derbyshire 22 10.52x
Lincolnshire 15 7.02x
Lancashire 10 0.63x
Nottinghamshire 8 4.44x
Warwickshire 6 1.78x
Cumberland 2 1.74x
Middlesex 2 0.15x
Staffordshire 1 0.22x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Holy Trinity in Yorkshire leads with 16 Sargesons recorded in 1881 and an index of 50.24x.

Place Total Index
Holy Trinity 16 50.24x
Keighley 15 106.31x
Glossop Dale 12 122.45x
Rotherham 9 120.64x
Althorpe 8 1632.65x
Hotham 8 4705.88x
Pendleton In Salford 7 37.06x
Worksop 7 131.09x
Barnoldswick 6 324.32x
Eckington 6 118.11x
Chesterfield 4 51.02x
Owston 4 655.74x
Stratford On Avon 4 213.90x
Brightside Bierlow 3 11.55x
Sheffield 3 7.12x
Crowle 2 153.85x
Old Stratford 2 104.71x
Poplar London 2 7.93x
Selby 2 72.20x
Wadworth 2 769.23x
Barton Upon Irwell 1 8.38x
Ecclesall Bierlow 1 3.71x
Frieston 1 196.08x
Heeley 1 24.88x
Kimberworth 1 13.61x
Lower Upper Holker 1 454.55x
Manchester 1 1.40x
Newington 1 27.40x
Newton Upon Trent 1 714.29x
Pocklington 1 80.00x
Ranskill 1 588.24x
St Cuthbert Within 1 75.19x
West Butterwick With 1 303.03x
Wetheral 1 65.79x
Wolverhampton 1 2.88x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Sargeson surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Sarah 10
Ann 5
Elizabeth 4
Ellen 4
Mary 4
Emma 3
Annie 2
Catherine 2
Hannah 2
Harriet 2
Alice 1
Amy 1
Beatrice 1
Charlotte 1
Clara 1
Daisy 1
E. 1
Edith 1
Eliza 1
Evelena 1
Georgiana 1
Isabella 1
Jane 1
Jn. 1
Laura 1
Lauretta 1
Lillian 1
Lilly 1
Louisa 1
Margaret 1
Maria 1
Martha 1
Minnie 1
Ruth 1
Susannah 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Sargeson surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

FAQ

Sargeson surname: questions and answers

How common was the Sargeson surname in 1881?

In 1881, 137 people were recorded with the Sargeson surname. That placed it at #16,358 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Sargeson surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 261 in 2016. That gives Sargeson a modern rank of #16,309.

What does the Sargeson map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Sargeson bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.