NameCensus.

UK surname

Shackel

In the 1881 census there were 101 people recorded with the Shackel surname, ranking it #19,636 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 89, ranked #32,297, down from #19,636 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Swindon, Lyddington, London parishes and St Pancras. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Hastings, Cotswold and Eastbourne.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Shackel is 143 in 1911. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 11.9%.

1881 census count

101

Ranked #19,636

Modern count

89

2016, ranked #32,297

Peak year

1911

143 bearers

Map years

5

1881 to 1998

Key insights

  • Shackel had 101 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #19,636 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 89 in 2016, ranked #32,297.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 143 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Outer Suburbs.

Shackel surname distribution map

The map shows where the Shackel surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Shackel surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Shackel over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 97 #17,484
1861 historical 80 #23,566
1881 historical 101 #19,636
1891 historical 113 #22,162
1901 historical 110 #21,604
1911 historical 143 #18,401
1997 modern 118 #24,423
1998 modern 119 #24,918
1999 modern 116 #25,487
2000 modern 112 #25,978
2001 modern 109 #26,059
2002 modern 105 #27,123
2003 modern 99 #27,871
2004 modern 92 #29,197
2005 modern 91 #29,406
2006 modern 86 #30,425
2007 modern 83 #31,183
2008 modern 84 #31,370
2009 modern 88 #31,352
2010 modern 87 #31,990
2011 modern 85 #32,127
2012 modern 92 #31,528
2013 modern 91 #32,020
2014 modern 88 #32,495
2015 modern 87 #32,514
2016 modern 89 #32,297

Geography

Back to top

Where Shackels are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Swindon, Lyddington, London parishes, St Pancras and Battersea. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Hastings, Cotswold, Eastbourne and Hammersmith and Fulham. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Swindon, Lyddington Wiltshire
2 London parishes London 1
3 London parishes London 3
4 St Pancras London (North Districts)
5 Battersea London (South Districts)

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Hastings 002 Hastings
2 Cotswold 005 Cotswold
3 Eastbourne 013 Eastbourne
4 Hastings 001 Hastings
5 Hammersmith and Fulham 021 Hammersmith and Fulham

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Shackel

These lists show first names that appear often with the Shackel surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Shackel

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Shackel, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Ethnically Diverse Suburban Professionals

Group

Outer Suburbs

Nationally, the Shackel surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Outer Suburbs, within Ethnically Diverse Suburban Professionals. This does not mean every Shackel household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These neighbourhoods are found on the outer edges of many towns and cities. Many residents were born outside the UK. Indian ethnic group representation is high. There are high numbers of families with dependent children aged 5 to 14. Incidences of disability and of provision of unpaid care are low. Neighbourhoods provide a mix of detached housing and flats, and terraced housing is not uncommon. Levels of overcrowding are low and homeownership rates are high. Professional and managerial occupations are prevalent: unemployment is low and education to degree level is the norm.

Wider pattern

Those working within the managerial, professional and administrative occupations typically reflect a wide range of ethnic groups, and reside in detached or semi-detached housing. Their residential locations at the edges of cities and conurbations and car-based lifestyles are more characteristic of Supergroup membership than birthplace or participation in child-rearing. Houses are typically owner-occupied and marriage rates are lower than the national average. This Supergroup is found throughout suburban UK.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Social Rented Sector Families with Children

Group

Social Rented Sector Pockets

Within London, Shackel is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector Pockets, part of Social Rented Sector Families with Children. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Found in pockets across London, residents are less likely to live in private sector rentals and fewer adults are students. Fewer individuals work in transport and communications occupations relative to the Supergroup average. More individuals identify as Black and were born in Africa.

Wider London pattern

Residents of these neighbourhoods include sizable numbers identifying with ethnicities originating outside Europe, particularly in Africa or Bangladesh. The proportion of residents identifying as White, Indian or Pakistani is well below the London average. Neighbourhood age profiles are skewed towards younger adults, and above average numbers of families have children. Rates of use of English at home are below average. Marriage rates are low, and levels of separation or divorce are above average. Housing is predominantly in flats, and renting in the social rented sector the norm - few residents are owner occupiers. Housing is often overcrowded, and neighbourhoods are amongst the most densely populated in London. Disability rates are above average, although levels of unpaid care provision are about average. Employment is in caring, leisure, other service occupations, sales and customer service, or process, plant, and machine operation. Part time working and full-time student study are common. Levels of unemployment are slightly above average. Most residents have only Level 1 or 2 educational qualifications or have completed apprenticeships.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Shackel is most concentrated in decile 10 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

10
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Shackel falls in decile 7 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

7
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Shackel is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Shackel, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Shackel families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Shackel surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Middlesex leads with 33 Shackels recorded in 1881 and an index of 3.22x.

County Total Index
Middlesex 33 3.22x
Berkshire 29 37.72x
Channel Islands 7 23.06x
Wiltshire 7 7.73x
Somerset 5 3.03x
Dorset 4 5.95x
Hampshire 4 1.91x
Surrey 4 0.80x
Hertfordshire 2 2.83x
Yorkshire 2 0.20x
Buckinghamshire 1 1.62x
Devon 1 0.47x
Essex 1 0.49x
Kent 1 0.29x
Lancashire 1 0.08x
Lincolnshire 1 0.61x
Norfolk 1 0.64x
Warwickshire 1 0.39x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Westminster St John in Middlesex leads with 13 Shackels recorded in 1881 and an index of 104.25x.

Place Total Index
Westminster St John 13 104.25x
Reading St Giles 8 106.10x
Sonning 7 823.53x
St Peter 7 795.45x
Hampstead London 6 37.62x
Swindon 6 85.35x
Basildon 4 1739.13x
New Windsor 4 155.04x
North Perrott 4 3636.36x
St Pancras London 4 4.85x
Earley 3 234.38x
Hackney London 3 5.22x
Mottisfont 3 1666.67x
Wareham Holy Trinity 3 1034.48x
Bawtry 2 625.00x
Binfield 2 338.98x
Camberwell 2 3.06x
Lambeth 2 2.24x
Paddington London 2 5.31x
St Marylebone London 2 3.66x
Aston 1 1.41x
Basingstoke 1 41.49x
Deptford St Paul 1 3.71x
Ealing 1 10.93x
Eton 1 71.43x
Kensington London 1 1.76x
Littleham 1 64.10x
Manthorpe Cum Little 1 80.00x
Melcombe Regis 1 35.84x
Mere 1 97.09x
Newbury 1 40.65x
North Meols 1 8.40x
Northwold 1 238.10x
Rickmansworth 1 51.55x
St George Hanover 1 7.48x
Tring 1 53.19x
Wanstead 1 28.25x
Weston Bamfylde 1 2500.00x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Shackel surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Shackel surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
George 12
Charles 5
John 4
Edward 3
William 3
Frederick 2
Henry 2
James 2
Joseph 2
Thomas 2
Albert 1
Alfred 1
Bertram 1
Frank 1
Fredk.C. 1
Fredrick 1
Philip 1
Richard 1
Robt. 1
Samuel 1
Walter 1

FAQ

Shackel surname: questions and answers

How common was the Shackel surname in 1881?

In 1881, 101 people were recorded with the Shackel surname. That placed it at #19,636 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Shackel surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 89 in 2016. That gives Shackel a modern rank of #32,297.

What does the Shackel map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Shackel bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.