NameCensus.

UK surname

Sleith

In the 1881 census there were 64 people recorded with the Sleith surname, ranking it #24,561 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 151, ranked #23,615, up from #24,561 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to No data. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Dover, Holytown and Clydesdale and New Stevenston.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Sleith is 174 in 2003. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 135.9%.

1881 census count

64

Ranked #24,561

Modern count

151

2016, ranked #23,615

Peak year

2003

174 bearers

Map years

3

1998 to 2016

Key insights

  • Sleith had 64 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #24,561 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 151 in 2016, ranked #23,615.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 97 in 1901.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Established but Challenged.

Sleith surname distribution map

The map shows where the Sleith surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Sleith surname density by area, 2016 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Sleith over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 25 #28,853
1861 historical 47 #28,023
1881 historical 64 #24,561
1891 historical 92 #25,109
1901 historical 97 #23,227
1911 historical 53 #27,508
1997 modern 159 #20,339
1998 modern 160 #20,832
1999 modern 157 #21,201
2000 modern 160 #20,903
2001 modern 158 #20,788
2002 modern 172 #20,108
2003 modern 174 #19,760
2004 modern 162 #20,756
2005 modern 148 #21,961
2006 modern 147 #22,221
2007 modern 152 #22,022
2008 modern 153 #22,132
2009 modern 158 #22,168
2010 modern 160 #22,487
2011 modern 154 #22,886
2012 modern 150 #23,264
2013 modern 149 #23,765
2014 modern 155 #23,333
2015 modern 152 #23,507
2016 modern 151 #23,615

Geography

Back to top

Where Sleiths are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around No data. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Dover, Holytown, Clydesdale and New Stevenston, Coltness and Ythanside. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 No data No data

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Dover 006 Dover
2 Holytown North Lanarkshire
3 Clydesdale and New Stevenston North Lanarkshire
4 Coltness North Lanarkshire
5 Ythanside Aberdeenshire

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Sleith

These lists show first names that appear often with the Sleith surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Sleith

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Sleith, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce

Group

Established but Challenged

Nationally, the Sleith surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Established but Challenged, within Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce. This does not mean every Sleith household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Many households in these neighbourhoods comprise separated or divorced single parents with dependent children. Residents are typically born in the UK, and these neighbourhoods have relatively few members of ethnic minorities. The prevalence of children, their parents and those at or above normal retirement age, suggests neighbourhood structures may be long-established. Levels of unpaid care are high, and long-term disability is more common than in the Supergroup as a whole. Use of the social rented sector is common, often in terraced houses. Levels of overcrowding are above the Supergroup average. Unemployment is high, while those in work are employed in elementary occupations such as caring, leisure and customer services. Many residents have low level qualifications. Neighbourhood concentrations of this Group are found in the South Wales Valleys, Belfast, Londonderry and the Central Lowlands of Scotland.

Wider pattern

Living in terraced or semi-detached houses, residents of these neighbourhoods typically lack high levels of education and work in elementary or routine service occupations. Unemployment is above average. Residents are predominantly born in the UK, and residents are also predominantly from ethnic minorities. Social (but not private sector) rented sector housing is common. This Supergroup is found throughout the UK’s conurbations and industrial regions but is also an integral part of smaller towns.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Social Rented Sector Families with Children

Group

Challenged Inner London Communities

Within London, Sleith is most associated with areas classed as Challenged Inner London Communities, part of Social Rented Sector Families with Children. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Resident in some of Inner London’s most over-crowded communities, many families have children and marriage/civil partnership rates are above the Supergroup average. Other adults such as students live in communal establishments. Few residents have Level 4 educational qualifications, levels of unemployment are above the Supergroup average, and employment is concentrated in service occupations such as distribution, hotels and restaurants. Relative to the Supergroup average, fewer residents identify as being of mixed/multiple ethnicities, Black or Other Asian.

Wider London pattern

Residents of these neighbourhoods include sizable numbers identifying with ethnicities originating outside Europe, particularly in Africa or Bangladesh. The proportion of residents identifying as White, Indian or Pakistani is well below the London average. Neighbourhood age profiles are skewed towards younger adults, and above average numbers of families have children. Rates of use of English at home are below average. Marriage rates are low, and levels of separation or divorce are above average. Housing is predominantly in flats, and renting in the social rented sector the norm - few residents are owner occupiers. Housing is often overcrowded, and neighbourhoods are amongst the most densely populated in London. Disability rates are above average, although levels of unpaid care provision are about average. Employment is in caring, leisure, other service occupations, sales and customer service, or process, plant, and machine operation. Part time working and full-time student study are common. Levels of unemployment are slightly above average. Most residents have only Level 1 or 2 educational qualifications or have completed apprenticeships.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Sleith is most concentrated in decile 2 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the less healthy end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

2
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Sleith falls in decile 4 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

4
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Sleith is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of Over 70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

10
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Sleith, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Sleith families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Sleith surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Lanarkshire leads with 24 Sleiths recorded in 1881 and an index of 11.89x.

County Total Index
Lanarkshire 24 11.89x
Lancashire 13 1.75x
Staffordshire 6 2.85x
Durham 4 2.15x
Kent 4 1.88x
Angus 3 5.19x
Derbyshire 2 2.05x
Leicestershire 2 2.89x
Middlesex 2 0.32x
Renfrewshire 2 4.13x
Ayrshire 1 2.14x
Cumberland 1 1.86x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Bothwell in Lanarkshire leads with 12 Sleiths recorded in 1881 and an index of 218.98x.

Place Total Index
Bothwell 12 218.98x
Cambusnethan 9 200.89x
Haughton 5 462.96x
Ardwick 4 59.88x
Bishopwearmouth 4 25.09x
Burham 4 1379.31x
Liverpool 4 8.89x
Liff Benvie 3 34.17x
Wednesbury 3 56.93x
Duffield 2 259.74x
Eastwood 2 67.11x
Govan 2 4.00x
Leicester St Margaret 2 11.85x
Limehouse London 2 29.20x
Wolstanton Chesterton 2 185.19x
Blymhill 1 909.09x
Maryhill 1 25.32x
Ochiltree 1 312.50x
Workington 1 32.47x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Sleith surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Elizabeth 2
Hannah 2
Margret 2
Sarah 2
Elizth. 1
Esther 1
Harriet 1
L.Jane 1
Mary 1
Rose 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Sleith surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 4
George 3
James 3
David 2
Jno. 2
Samuel 2
Geo. 1
Henry 1
Josiah 1
William 1

Top occupations

Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in Sleith households.

FAQ

Sleith surname: questions and answers

How common was the Sleith surname in 1881?

In 1881, 64 people were recorded with the Sleith surname. That placed it at #24,561 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Sleith surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 151 in 2016. That gives Sleith a modern rank of #23,615.

What does the Sleith map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Sleith bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.