NameCensus.

UK surname

Tidmas

In the 1881 census there were 81 people recorded with the Tidmas surname, ranking it #22,082 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 104, ranked #30,317, down from #22,082 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to No data. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Derby, Stratford-on-Avon and Leicester.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Tidmas is 112 in 1997. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 28.4%.

1881 census count

81

Ranked #22,082

Modern count

104

2016, ranked #30,317

Peak year

1997

112 bearers

Map years

2

1998 to 2016

Key insights

  • Tidmas had 81 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #22,082 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 104 in 2016, ranked #30,317.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 93 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Challenged Communities.

Tidmas surname distribution map

The map shows where the Tidmas surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Tidmas surname density by area, 2016 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Tidmas over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 75 #20,268
1861 historical 65 #25,618
1881 historical 81 #22,082
1891 historical 82 #26,494
1901 historical 62 #27,252
1911 historical 93 #23,492
1997 modern 112 #25,244
1998 modern 112 #25,856
1999 modern 112 #26,044
2000 modern 108 #26,549
2001 modern 105 #26,620
2002 modern 106 #26,985
2003 modern 103 #27,234
2004 modern 100 #27,964
2005 modern 95 #28,817
2006 modern 95 #29,113
2007 modern 94 #29,650
2008 modern 101 #28,825
2009 modern 90 #31,094
2010 modern 88 #31,875
2011 modern 92 #31,301
2012 modern 97 #30,798
2013 modern 104 #30,076
2014 modern 105 #30,204
2015 modern 103 #30,444
2016 modern 104 #30,317

Geography

Back to top

Where Tidmas' are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around No data. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Derby, Stratford-on-Avon, Leicester and Dartford. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 No data No data

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Derby 006 Derby
2 Stratford-on-Avon 004 Stratford-on-Avon
3 Derby 007 Derby
4 Leicester 026 Leicester
5 Dartford 012 Dartford

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Tidmas

These lists show first names that appear often with the Tidmas surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Tidmas

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Tidmas, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Baseline UK

Group

Challenged Communities

Nationally, the Tidmas surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Challenged Communities, within Baseline UK. This does not mean every Tidmas household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Residents of these neighbourhoods typically live in households with dependent children, and there are fewer-than-average residents of normal retirement age or over. Identification with ethnic minorities, particularly Black, or Mixed or Multiple ethnicities is common. The rate of Christian religious affiliation is low. Housing predominantly consists of semi-detached houses, along with a significant number of terraced properties and flats. Overcrowded social housing is common, and private renting occurs at average UK levels. Those in employment work mainly in caring leisure and other services; process, plant and machine operation; or elementary occupations. Unemployment is high, and few individuals have degree level qualifications. Many of these neighbourhoods occur in commuter towns or less accessible areas of larger towns and cities.

Wider pattern

This Supergroup exemplifies the broad base to the UK’s social structure, encompassing as it does the average or modal levels of many neighbourhood characteristics, including all housing tenures, a range of levels of educational attainment and religious affiliations, and a variety of pre-retirement age structures. Yet, in combination, these mixes are each distinctive of the parts of the UK. Overall, terraced houses and flats are the most prevalent, as is employment in intermediate or low-skilled occupations. However, this Supergroup is also characterised by above average levels of unemployment and lower levels of use of English as the main language. Many neighbourhoods occur in south London and the UK’s other major urban centres.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburban Asian Communities

Group

Young Asian Family Terraces

Within London, Tidmas is most associated with areas classed as Young Asian Family Terraces, part of Suburban Asian Communities. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These households with dependent children typically live in terraced housing and are of (non-Chinese) Asian extraction. Individuals with Bangladeshi origins are particularly in evidence. Employment is often in elementary occupations or as process, plant or machine operatives, and part-time work is common. Students are much in evidence.

Wider London pattern

Many residents of these neighbourhoods are of (non-Chinese) Asian descent, with many identifying as Indian, Pakistani or Bangladeshi. Neighbourhoods are located across large areas of suburban west, north-east and south London. Detached, semi-detached and terraced houses are more prevalent than flats and socially rented housing is uncommon. Few residents live in communal establishments. Many families have dependent children, sometimes in overcrowded accommodation, and few households are ethnically mixed. Marriage rates are above the London average. The even age distribution, relative absence of individuals living alone and frequent incidence of households with children suggests that multi-generation households may be relatively common. Employment is often in skilled trades, elementary, sales and customer service occupations, and roles as process, plant, and machine operatives. Manufacturing and construction are well represented, along with employment in distribution, hotels, and restaurants. Many adults have only level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. English is not used at home by some residents. Religious affiliation is above average.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Tidmas is most concentrated in decile 8 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

8
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Tidmas falls in decile 2 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

2
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Tidmas is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Tidmas, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Tidmas families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Tidmas surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Warwickshire leads with 23 Tidmas' recorded in 1881 and an index of 11.55x.

County Total Index
Warwickshire 23 11.55x
Middlesex 17 2.15x
Lancashire 8 0.85x
Leicestershire 8 9.13x
Derbyshire 6 4.85x
Staffordshire 6 2.25x
Nottinghamshire 4 3.76x
Worcestershire 4 3.88x
Essex 2 1.28x
Somerset 2 1.57x
Oxfordshire 1 2.05x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Hackney London in Middlesex leads with 12 Tidmas' recorded in 1881 and an index of 27.09x.

Place Total Index
Hackney London 12 27.09x
Burnage 8 3478.26x
Leamington Priors 7 142.86x
Coventry St Michael 6 93.75x
Derby St Peter 6 152.28x
Stafford St Mary 6 159.15x
Coventry Holy Trinity 5 84.03x
Leicester All Sts 4 232.56x
Leicester St Margaret 4 18.73x
Pedmore 4 2857.14x
Sutton Bonnington 4 1481.48x
St Pancras London 3 4.72x
Islington London 2 2.61x
Leamington 2 151.52x
Wanstead 2 73.26x
Bathwick 1 70.92x
Birmingham 1 1.51x
Oxford St Giles 1 42.92x
Solihull 1 69.93x
Walcot 1 14.77x
Weston 1 1666.67x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Tidmas surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Elizabeth 5
Sarah 4
Louisa 3
Maria 3
Ada 2
Ann 2
Annie 2
Caroline 2
Ellen 2
Mary 2
Alice 1
Amanda 1
Clara 1
Emily 1
Emma 1
Ethel 1
Fanny 1
Hannah 1
Harriet 1
Harriett 1
Helen 1
Lucy 1
Mabel 1
Martha 1
Maude 1
Nelly 1
Rheda 1
Rose 1
Susannah 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Tidmas surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 7
George 4
Thomas 4
Alfred 3
Charles 3
Henry 2
John 2
Archibald 1
Christopher 1
Fredrick 1
Horace 1
James 1
Jonathan 1
Joseph 1
Loftos 1
Louis 1
Mark 1

Top occupations

Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in Tidmas households.

FAQ

Tidmas surname: questions and answers

How common was the Tidmas surname in 1881?

In 1881, 81 people were recorded with the Tidmas surname. That placed it at #22,082 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Tidmas surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 104 in 2016. That gives Tidmas a modern rank of #30,317.

What does the Tidmas map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Tidmas bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.