NameCensus.

UK surname

Tombling

In the 1881 census there were 93 people recorded with the Tombling surname, ranking it #20,593 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 166, ranked #22,140, down from #20,593 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to London parishes, Tynemouth (Chirton, Preston, Murton, Whitley, Monkseaton), Earsdon (Earsdon) and Stranton. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Redcar and Cleveland, Hambleton and Salford.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Tombling is 173 in 2004. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 78.5%.

1881 census count

93

Ranked #20,593

Modern count

166

2016, ranked #22,140

Peak year

2004

173 bearers

Map years

6

1891 to 2016

Key insights

  • Tombling had 93 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #20,593 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 166 in 2016, ranked #22,140.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 149 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Challenged Communities.

Tombling surname distribution map

The map shows where the Tombling surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Tombling surname density by area, 2016 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Tombling over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 54 #23,577
1861 historical 96 #21,648
1881 historical 93 #20,593
1891 historical 129 #20,285
1901 historical 135 #19,203
1911 historical 149 #17,937
1997 modern 147 #21,393
1998 modern 141 #22,517
1999 modern 144 #22,405
2000 modern 148 #21,971
2001 modern 148 #21,664
2002 modern 160 #21,011
2003 modern 159 #20,881
2004 modern 173 #19,937
2005 modern 167 #20,296
2006 modern 162 #20,886
2007 modern 164 #20,973
2008 modern 165 #21,056
2009 modern 166 #21,469
2010 modern 167 #21,835
2011 modern 166 #21,745
2012 modern 163 #21,989
2013 modern 164 #22,236
2014 modern 167 #22,180
2015 modern 163 #22,407
2016 modern 166 #22,140

Geography

Back to top

Where Tomblings are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around London parishes, Tynemouth (Chirton, Preston, Murton, Whitley, Monkseaton), Earsdon (Earsdon), Stranton and Tynemouth. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Redcar and Cleveland, Hambleton, Salford and Broxbourne. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 London parishes London 1
2 London parishes London 3
3 Tynemouth (Chirton, Preston, Murton, Whitley, Monkseaton), Earsdon (Earsdon) Northumberland
4 Stranton Durham
5 Tynemouth Northumberland

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Redcar and Cleveland 022 Redcar and Cleveland
2 Redcar and Cleveland 011 Redcar and Cleveland
3 Hambleton 001 Hambleton
4 Salford 020 Salford
5 Broxbourne 008 Broxbourne

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Tombling

These lists show first names that appear often with the Tombling surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Tombling

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Tombling, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Baseline UK

Group

Challenged Communities

Nationally, the Tombling surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Challenged Communities, within Baseline UK. This does not mean every Tombling household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Residents of these neighbourhoods typically live in households with dependent children, and there are fewer-than-average residents of normal retirement age or over. Identification with ethnic minorities, particularly Black, or Mixed or Multiple ethnicities is common. The rate of Christian religious affiliation is low. Housing predominantly consists of semi-detached houses, along with a significant number of terraced properties and flats. Overcrowded social housing is common, and private renting occurs at average UK levels. Those in employment work mainly in caring leisure and other services; process, plant and machine operation; or elementary occupations. Unemployment is high, and few individuals have degree level qualifications. Many of these neighbourhoods occur in commuter towns or less accessible areas of larger towns and cities.

Wider pattern

This Supergroup exemplifies the broad base to the UK’s social structure, encompassing as it does the average or modal levels of many neighbourhood characteristics, including all housing tenures, a range of levels of educational attainment and religious affiliations, and a variety of pre-retirement age structures. Yet, in combination, these mixes are each distinctive of the parts of the UK. Overall, terraced houses and flats are the most prevalent, as is employment in intermediate or low-skilled occupations. However, this Supergroup is also characterised by above average levels of unemployment and lower levels of use of English as the main language. Many neighbourhoods occur in south London and the UK’s other major urban centres.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Professional Employment and Family Lifecycles

Group

Inner London Working Professionals

Within London, Tombling is most associated with areas classed as Inner London Working Professionals, part of Professional Employment and Family Lifecycles. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These primarily Inner London neighbourhoods are more densely populated than the Supergroup average. Residents have a younger over-all age profile than the Supergroup as a whole, and are less likely to be owner occupiers. Full time employment is more common than elsewhere in the Supergroup and multiple car ownership is uncommon. Chinese and non-EU-born European migrants are less in evidence than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

These neighbourhoods house people of all ages, predominantly of White British or European extraction. Resident turnover is low. Religious affiliation is less common than average and tends to be Christian if expressed. Homeownership, typically of terraced houses, is common but use of the social rented sector is not. Employment is typically in professional, managerial and associate professional or technical occupations. There are few full-time students. Level 4 qualifications are common. More households lack dependent children than have them which, considered alongside low levels of crowding and over-all age structure, indicates that many households may be post child-rearing and in late middle age. Incidence of disability is low, as is residence in communal establishments.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Tombling is most concentrated in decile 5 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

5
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Tombling falls in decile 1 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

1
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Tombling is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 60-70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

9
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Tombling, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Tombling families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Tombling surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Norfolk leads with 24 Tomblings recorded in 1881 and an index of 17.21x.

County Total Index
Norfolk 24 17.21x
Durham 18 6.67x
Middlesex 18 1.98x
Surrey 12 2.72x
Northumberland 11 8.15x
Cumberland 5 6.40x
Yorkshire 2 0.22x
Kent 1 0.32x
Lanarkshire 1 0.34x
Midlothian 1 0.82x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. North Elmham in Norfolk leads with 17 Tomblings recorded in 1881 and an index of 5000.00x.

Place Total Index
North Elmham 17 5000.00x
Bermondsey 12 44.44x
Stranton 11 121.15x
Tynemouth 11 152.14x
St Cuthbert W O 5 131.23x
St Pancras London 5 6.85x
Islington London 4 4.55x
Bethnal Green London 3 7.61x
Bishopwearmouth 3 12.95x
Kensington London 3 5.95x
South Lynn 3 191.08x
Westerton 3 2142.86x
Barnsley 2 21.58x
Chelsea London 2 7.32x
Great Yarmouth 2 17.32x
Govan 1 1.38x
Gressenhall 1 384.62x
Heworth 1 18.80x
North Leith 1 17.79x
Northfleet 1 36.63x
Paddington London 1 3.00x
Wood Norton 1 1111.11x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Tombling surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Tombling surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
George 8
John 8
James 6
Robert 5
William 5
Henry 3
Albert 1
Andrew 1
Arthur 1
Charles 1
Christopher 1
Edward 1
Forster 1
Harry 1
Horace 1
Jacob 1
Luke 1
Peter 1
Thomas 1
Walter 1

Top occupations

Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in Tombling households.

FAQ

Tombling surname: questions and answers

How common was the Tombling surname in 1881?

In 1881, 93 people were recorded with the Tombling surname. That placed it at #20,593 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Tombling surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 166 in 2016. That gives Tombling a modern rank of #22,140.

What does the Tombling map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Tombling bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.