NameCensus.

UK surname

Trees

An English surname derived from the plural form of "tree", possibly referring to a person living near or among trees.

In the 1881 census there were 162 people recorded with the Trees surname, ranking it #14,746 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 162, ranked #22,512, down from #14,746 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Darlington, Knaresborough (Bilton and Harrogate, Scriven with Tentergate, Knaresborough), Pannall and Manchester. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Sefton, Howe of Alford and Leeds.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Trees is 222 in 1911. Compared with 1881, the name has stayed broadly stable by 0.0%.

1881 census count

162

Ranked #14,746

Modern count

162

2016, ranked #22,512

Peak year

1911

222 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Trees had 162 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #14,746 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 162 in 2016, ranked #22,512.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 222 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Ageing Communities.

Trees surname distribution map

The map shows where the Trees surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Trees surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Trees over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 121 #15,049
1861 historical 145 #15,715
1881 historical 162 #14,746
1891 historical 209 #14,459
1901 historical 191 #15,579
1911 historical 222 #13,992
1997 modern 170 #19,505
1998 modern 174 #19,729
1999 modern 169 #20,233
2000 modern 157 #21,146
2001 modern 160 #20,616
2002 modern 165 #20,619
2003 modern 155 #21,217
2004 modern 151 #21,720
2005 modern 149 #21,866
2006 modern 152 #21,721
2007 modern 158 #21,464
2008 modern 159 #21,598
2009 modern 159 #22,072
2010 modern 163 #22,205
2011 modern 159 #22,382
2012 modern 160 #22,260
2013 modern 164 #22,236
2014 modern 167 #22,180
2015 modern 165 #22,241
2016 modern 162 #22,512

Geography

Back to top

Where Trees' are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Darlington, Knaresborough (Bilton and Harrogate, Scriven with Tentergate, Knaresborough), Pannall, Manchester, Warsill, Ripon (Newby-with-Mulwith, Ripon) and Bradford. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Sefton, Howe of Alford, Leeds, Stockton-on-Tees and Harrogate. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Darlington Durham
2 Knaresborough (Bilton and Harrogate, Scriven with Tentergate, Knaresborough), Pannall Yorkshire, West Riding
3 Manchester Lancashire
4 Warsill, Ripon (Newby-with-Mulwith, Ripon) Yorkshire, West Riding
5 Bradford Yorkshire, West Riding

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Sefton 006 Sefton
2 Howe of Alford Aberdeenshire
3 Leeds 079 Leeds
4 Stockton-on-Tees 012 Stockton-on-Tees
5 Harrogate 002 Harrogate

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Trees

These lists show first names that appear often with the Trees surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Trees

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Trees, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Ageing Communities

Nationally, the Trees surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Ageing Communities, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Trees household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Many residents are of normal retirement age or above and live in communal establishments, and there are few dependent children. The dominant property type is a mix of retirement flats and detached houses. Those in work are likely to be employed in managerial and professional occupations, and many residents are educated to degree level. Levels of owner occupation are high, but the private rental sector is also present. Rural locations predominate.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Professional Employment and Family Lifecycles

Group

Inner London Working Professionals

Within London, Trees is most associated with areas classed as Inner London Working Professionals, part of Professional Employment and Family Lifecycles. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These primarily Inner London neighbourhoods are more densely populated than the Supergroup average. Residents have a younger over-all age profile than the Supergroup as a whole, and are less likely to be owner occupiers. Full time employment is more common than elsewhere in the Supergroup and multiple car ownership is uncommon. Chinese and non-EU-born European migrants are less in evidence than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

These neighbourhoods house people of all ages, predominantly of White British or European extraction. Resident turnover is low. Religious affiliation is less common than average and tends to be Christian if expressed. Homeownership, typically of terraced houses, is common but use of the social rented sector is not. Employment is typically in professional, managerial and associate professional or technical occupations. There are few full-time students. Level 4 qualifications are common. More households lack dependent children than have them which, considered alongside low levels of crowding and over-all age structure, indicates that many households may be post child-rearing and in late middle age. Incidence of disability is low, as is residence in communal establishments.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Trees is most concentrated in decile 8 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

8
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Trees falls in decile 10 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the less deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

10
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Trees is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 60-70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

9
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Trees, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

Meaning and origin of Trees

The surname Trees is believed to have originated in England, likely during the medieval period. It is thought to be a locational name, derived from a place name that referred to a location near a cluster of trees or a wooded area.

One possible origin of the name Trees is from the Old English word "treow," meaning tree. This word was used to describe not only individual trees but also wooded areas or groves. Over time, it may have evolved into the surname Trees to identify individuals who lived near or were associated with such a place.

Another theory suggests that the surname Trees could be a variant spelling of the place name "Treyres" or "Trayres," which was recorded in the Domesday Book of 1086. This was a survey of landholdings commissioned by William the Conqueror, and it provides some of the earliest written records of surnames in England.

The earliest known recorded instance of the surname Trees dates back to the 13th century. One notable example is Roger de Trees, who was mentioned in the Assize Rolls of Staffordshire in 1285. These rolls were legal records that documented court proceedings and property transactions.

In the 14th century, the name Trees appeared in various records, such as the Subsidy Rolls of Sussex in 1332, where a John Trees was listed. These rolls were tax records that documented individuals who were required to pay a subsidy or tax to the Crown.

Over the centuries, the surname Trees has been associated with several notable individuals. One such person was Thomas Trees, a merchant and philanthropist from London who lived in the 16th century (c. 1535 – 1610). He was a member of the Worshipful Company of Mercers and contributed to the establishment of several charitable institutions in the city.

Another prominent figure with the surname Trees was Sir James Trees (1625 – 1693), an English politician and member of Parliament. He served as the Lord Mayor of London in 1677 and was knighted by King Charles II for his services to the city.

In the 18th century, John Trees (1701 – 1770) was a renowned architect and surveyor who worked on various projects in London, including the reconstruction of several churches after the Great Fire of London in 1666.

Moving into the 19th century, Henry Trees (1819 – 1892) was a British landscape painter known for his depictions of rural scenes and pastoral landscapes. His works were exhibited at the Royal Academy and other prestigious galleries in London.

Another notable figure was Sir William Trees (1858 – 1932), a British diplomat and civil servant who served as the Governor of the Straits Settlements (now part of Malaysia) from 1904 to 1910. He was knighted in 1907 for his contributions to the British Empire.

Sourced from namecensus.com.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Trees families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Trees surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Yorkshire leads with 89 Trees' recorded in 1881 and an index of 5.68x.

County Total Index
Yorkshire 89 5.68x
Durham 36 7.66x
Lancashire 12 0.64x
Nottinghamshire 6 2.82x
Middlesex 5 0.32x
Staffordshire 4 0.75x
Surrey 3 0.39x
Kent 2 0.37x
Cheshire 1 0.29x
Essex 1 0.32x
Lincolnshire 1 0.40x
Northamptonshire 1 0.67x
Worcestershire 1 0.48x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Darlington in Durham leads with 34 Trees' recorded in 1881 and an index of 187.33x.

Place Total Index
Darlington 34 187.33x
Ripon 21 578.51x
York St Margaret 10 1030.93x
Pannal 7 466.67x
Bradford 6 15.83x
Hambleton 6 2068.97x
Menwith Cum Darley 6 1935.48x
Ossington 6 6000.00x
Knaresborough 5 203.25x
Salford 5 9.07x
Bowling 4 25.79x
Cheetham 4 28.59x
Follifoot 4 1481.48x
Horton In Bradford 4 16.36x
Rushall 4 127.39x
Sculcoates 4 16.11x
Baildon 3 101.69x
Broughton In Salford 2 11.67x
Gargrave 2 285.71x
Hackney London 2 2.26x
Hartlepool 2 29.94x
Lambeth 2 1.45x
Limehouse London 2 11.53x
Scriven Cum Tentergate 2 344.83x
Barrow In Furness 1 3.92x
Bilton Cum Harrogate 1 18.66x
Coulsdon 1 71.43x
Droitwich St Andrew 1 192.31x
Holy Trinity 1 2.66x
Leeds 1 1.13x
Linthorpe 1 10.71x
Luddington 1 312.50x
Milton In Milton 1 43.67x
Over 1 28.17x
Paddington London 1 1.72x
Sheffield 1 2.01x
Stourmouth 1 588.24x
West Ham 1 1.45x
Weston By Welland 1 833.33x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Trees surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Trees surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

FAQ

Trees surname: questions and answers

How common was the Trees surname in 1881?

In 1881, 162 people were recorded with the Trees surname. That placed it at #14,746 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Trees surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 162 in 2016. That gives Trees a modern rank of #22,512.

What does the Trees surname mean?

An English surname derived from the plural form of "tree", possibly referring to a person living near or among trees.

What does the Trees map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Trees bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.