NameCensus.

UK surname

Waggot

In the 1881 census there were 137 people recorded with the Waggot surname, ranking it #16,358 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 8, ranked #37,829, down from #16,358 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside, Haydon and Ryton. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Waggot is 137 in 1881. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 94.2%.

1881 census count

137

Ranked #16,358

Modern count

8

2016, ranked #37,829

Peak year

1881

137 bearers

Map years

1

1881 to 1881

Key insights

  • Waggot had 137 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #16,358 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 8 in 2016, ranked #37,829.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 137 in 1881.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is No data.

Waggot surname distribution map

The map shows where the Waggot surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Waggot surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Waggot over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 94 #17,837
1861 historical 81 #23,431
1881 historical 137 #16,358
1891 historical 56 #29,638
1901 historical 39 #29,799
1911 historical 21 #31,179
1997 modern 11 #36,912
1998 modern 11 #36,908
1999 modern 11 #36,917
2000 modern 11 #36,879
2001 modern 6 #37,456
2002 modern 12 #36,679
2003 modern 9 #37,101
2004 modern 11 #36,969
2005 modern 13 #36,833
2006 modern 14 #36,801
2007 modern 15 #36,793
2008 modern 13 #37,056
2009 modern 14 #37,041
2010 modern 12 #37,307
2011 modern 12 #37,287
2012 modern 9 #37,614
2013 modern 9 #37,653
2014 modern 8 #37,806
2015 modern 8 #37,797
2016 modern 8 #37,829

Geography

Back to top

Where Waggots are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside, Haydon, Ryton, Gateshead and Auckland St Andrew (North Bedburn), Witton-le-Wear. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside Durham
2 Haydon Northumberland
3 Ryton Durham
4 Gateshead Durham
5 Auckland St Andrew (North Bedburn), Witton-le-Wear Durham

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 No data No data

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Waggot

These lists show first names that appear often with the Waggot surname in historical and recent records.

Recent female names

No Forenames Found

Recent male names

No Forenames Found

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Waggot

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Waggot, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Nationally, the Waggot surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Waggot household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Within London, Waggot is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Waggot is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - Irish

This describes the area pattern most associated with Waggot, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Waggot families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Waggot surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Durham leads with 90 Waggots recorded in 1881 and an index of 22.64x.

County Total Index
Durham 90 22.64x
Northumberland 32 16.10x
Westmorland 8 27.24x
Lancashire 4 0.25x
Lincolnshire 1 0.47x
Midlothian 1 0.56x
Yorkshire 1 0.08x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Holmside in Durham leads with 14 Waggots recorded in 1881 and an index of 1428.57x.

Place Total Index
Holmside 14 1428.57x
Hedworth Monkton Jarrow 11 63.88x
Lamesley 9 420.56x
Chester Le Street 8 262.30x
Haydon 8 733.95x
Kendal 8 148.70x
Medomsley 8 432.43x
Tanfield 8 169.13x
Westgate 8 64.99x
Hedleyhope 7 1014.49x
Auckland St Helen 5 1190.48x
Bishopwearmouth 5 14.65x
Haswell 5 175.44x
Elswick 4 25.20x
Salford 4 8.58x
Newbiggin In Hexham 3 7500.00x
Newcastle On Tyne All Sts 3 25.27x
Newton Park 3 30000.00x
Norton 2 136.99x
Wallsend 2 31.70x
Auckland St Andrew 1 95.24x
Barnard Castle 1 51.02x
Bradford 1 3.12x
Conside Knitsley 1 32.36x
Gateshead 1 3.36x
Martin In Sleaford 1 270.27x
Newcastle On Tyne St John 1 38.31x
Seaham 1 68.97x
Sedgefield 1 70.42x
Stockton On Tees 1 5.22x
Temple 1 140.85x
Winlaton 1 26.25x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Waggot surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 14
Margaret 9
Elizabeth 7
Jane 6
Sarah 4
Hannah 3
Ann 2
Esther 2
Alice 1
Anney 1
Annie 1
Barbara 1
Betsey 1
Blanch 1
Eleanor 1
Ellen 1
Emily 1
Essie 1
Florence 1
Isabella 1
Rachael 1
Rose 1
Sarrah 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Waggot surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 13
Joseph 10
Thomas 10
William 6
Edward 4
Robert 4
Henry 3
Ralph 3
Christopher 2
James 2
Samuel 2
Thos 2
Andrew 1
Anthony 1
Charlton 1
David 1
Edwin 1
Fenwick 1
Francis 1
Frederick 1
Herrington 1
Margaret 1
Matthew 1
Wilfred 1
Willm.Jas. 1

FAQ

Waggot surname: questions and answers

How common was the Waggot surname in 1881?

In 1881, 137 people were recorded with the Waggot surname. That placed it at #16,358 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Waggot surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 8 in 2016. That gives Waggot a modern rank of #37,829.

What does the Waggot map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Waggot bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.