NameCensus.

UK surname

Blues

In the 1881 census there were 135 people recorded with the Blues surname, ranking it #16,515 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 375, ranked #12,457, up from #16,515 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Arbilot, Forfar and Gateshead. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Niddrie, Portobello and Central and South Inch.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Blues is 375 in 2016. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 177.8%.

1881 census count

135

Ranked #16,515

Modern count

375

2016, ranked #12,457

Peak year

2016

375 bearers

Map years

7

1861 to 2016

Key insights

  • Blues had 135 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #16,515 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 375 in 2016, ranked #12,457.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 158 in 1901.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Legacy and Demographically Mixed Communities.

Blues surname distribution map

The map shows where the Blues surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Blues surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Blues over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 93 #17,946
1861 historical 108 #19,856
1881 historical 135 #16,515
1891 historical 141 #19,108
1901 historical 158 #17,507
1911 historical 41 #28,802
1997 modern 339 #12,464
1998 modern 346 #12,630
1999 modern 339 #12,892
2000 modern 341 #12,801
2001 modern 319 #13,168
2002 modern 327 #13,217
2003 modern 318 #13,291
2004 modern 322 #13,260
2005 modern 337 #12,738
2006 modern 338 #12,779
2007 modern 342 #12,809
2008 modern 338 #13,044
2009 modern 349 #12,995
2010 modern 351 #13,220
2011 modern 350 #13,086
2012 modern 349 #12,993
2013 modern 357 #12,984
2014 modern 370 #12,712
2015 modern 373 #12,519
2016 modern 375 #12,457

Geography

Back to top

Where Blues' are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Arbilot, Forfar, Gateshead, Edinburgh and Dundee, Liff, Benvie and Invergowry. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Niddrie, Portobello, Central and South Inch, Mearns South and Benholm and Reading. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Arbilot Forfar
2 Forfar Forfar
3 Gateshead Durham
4 Edinburgh Edinburgh
5 Dundee, Liff, Benvie and Invergowry Forfar

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Niddrie City of Edinburgh
2 Portobello City of Edinburgh
3 Central and South Inch Perth and Kinross
4 Mearns South and Benholm Aberdeenshire
5 Reading 017 Reading

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Blues

These lists show first names that appear often with the Blues surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Blues

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Blues, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Legacy Communities

Group

Legacy and Demographically Mixed Communities

Nationally, the Blues surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Legacy and Demographically Mixed Communities, within Legacy Communities. This does not mean every Blues household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Households in these areas often include divorced or separated parents and commonly include children and young adults. The age structure is heavily skewed towards the most advanced age groups. Individuals identifying as members of ethnic minorities are not present in large numbers. Flats predominate, with some terraced, semi-detached, and detached units. Multiple car ownership is low, and housing is predominantly in the private and social rented sectors. Employment is less skewed towards traditional routine industrial occupations. Levels of educational attainment are generally low. The Group occurs principally in the Central Lowlands of Scotland and other Scottish towns.

Wider pattern

These neighbourhoods characteristically comprise pockets of flats that are scattered across the UK, particularly in towns that retain or have legacies of heavy industry or are in more remote seaside locations. Employed residents of these neighbourhoods work mainly in low-skilled occupations. Residents typically have limited educational qualifications. Unemployment is above average. Some residents live in overcrowded housing within the social rented sector and experience long-term disability. All adult age groups are represented, although there is an overall age bias towards elderly people in general and the very old in particular. Individuals identifying as belonging to ethnic minorities or Mixed or Multiple ethnic groups are uncommon.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburban Asian Communities

Group

Settled Semi-Detached Asians

Within London, Blues is most associated with areas classed as Settled Semi-Detached Asians, part of Suburban Asian Communities. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These residents share Supergroup characteristics of large (non-Chinese) Asian populations but those identifying as Bangladeshi are notably absent. Many residents were born in the UK, while other more recent migrants have African birthplaces. Semi-detached housing, much of it owner occupied, prevails in these suburban residential locations.

Wider London pattern

Many residents of these neighbourhoods are of (non-Chinese) Asian descent, with many identifying as Indian, Pakistani or Bangladeshi. Neighbourhoods are located across large areas of suburban west, north-east and south London. Detached, semi-detached and terraced houses are more prevalent than flats and socially rented housing is uncommon. Few residents live in communal establishments. Many families have dependent children, sometimes in overcrowded accommodation, and few households are ethnically mixed. Marriage rates are above the London average. The even age distribution, relative absence of individuals living alone and frequent incidence of households with children suggests that multi-generation households may be relatively common. Employment is often in skilled trades, elementary, sales and customer service occupations, and roles as process, plant, and machine operatives. Manufacturing and construction are well represented, along with employment in distribution, hotels, and restaurants. Many adults have only level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. English is not used at home by some residents. Religious affiliation is above average.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Blues is most concentrated in decile 6 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

6
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Blues falls in decile 2 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

2
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Blues is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of Over 70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

10
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Blues, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Blues families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Blues surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Angus leads with 47 Blues' recorded in 1881 and an index of 38.53x.

County Total Index
Angus 47 38.53x
Durham 28 7.15x
Kincardineshire 28 174.67x
Midlothian 10 5.67x
Lancashire 8 0.51x
Lanarkshire 6 1.41x
Aberdeenshire 3 2.46x
Fife 2 2.57x
Berwickshire 1 6.27x
Devon 1 0.36x
Northumberland 1 0.51x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Benholm in Kincardineshire leads with 27 Blues' recorded in 1881 and an index of 3913.04x.

Place Total Index
Benholm 27 3913.04x
Westoe 20 90.05x
Montrose 16 216.51x
Arbirlot 10 2702.70x
Dundee 10 21.96x
Forfar 8 121.03x
West Derby 7 15.31x
Barony 6 5.57x
Chester Le Street 5 166.11x
Edinburgh Buccleuch 4 95.92x
South Leith 4 20.15x
Aberdeen St Nicholas 3 13.15x
Harton 3 193.55x
Anstruther Easter 2 357.14x
Edinburgh Canongate 2 44.54x
Bervie 1 105.26x
Chirton 1 22.57x
Eassie Nevay 1 400.00x
Eyemouth 1 75.19x
Lethnot Navar 1 769.23x
Liff Benvie 1 5.40x
Liverpool 1 1.05x
Plymouth Charles The 1 8.29x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Blues surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Margaret 3
Margret 3
Mary 3
Eliza 2
Susannah 2
Amy 1
Ann 1
Elizabeth 1
Hannah 1
Issabell 1
Jane 1
Margt. 1
Marry 1
Rosanne 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Blues surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 5
Robert 3
George 2
Thomas 2
Alexander 1
Arthur 1
James 1
John 1

Top occupations

Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in Blues households.

FAQ

Blues surname: questions and answers

How common was the Blues surname in 1881?

In 1881, 135 people were recorded with the Blues surname. That placed it at #16,515 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Blues surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 375 in 2016. That gives Blues a modern rank of #12,457.

What does the Blues map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Blues bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.