NameCensus.

UK surname

Boarder

In the 1881 census there were 123 people recorded with the Boarder surname, ranking it #17,506 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 145, ranked #24,293, down from #17,506 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to London parishes, Tring and St Albans or The Abbey. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Watford, Wycombe and North Dorset.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Boarder is 228 in 1911. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 17.9%.

1881 census count

123

Ranked #17,506

Modern count

145

2016, ranked #24,293

Peak year

1911

228 bearers

Map years

8

1861 to 2016

Key insights

  • Boarder had 123 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #17,506 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 145 in 2016, ranked #24,293.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 228 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Legacy Industrial and Coastal Communities.

Boarder surname distribution map

The map shows where the Boarder surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Boarder surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Boarder over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 82 #19,317
1861 historical 222 #10,993
1881 historical 123 #17,506
1891 historical 104 #23,388
1901 historical 105 #22,179
1911 historical 228 #13,759
1997 modern 121 #24,019
1998 modern 125 #24,198
1999 modern 127 #24,125
2000 modern 129 #23,901
2001 modern 129 #23,557
2002 modern 135 #23,398
2003 modern 126 #24,146
2004 modern 132 #23,625
2005 modern 132 #23,623
2006 modern 140 #22,948
2007 modern 140 #23,231
2008 modern 145 #22,929
2009 modern 144 #23,577
2010 modern 142 #24,352
2011 modern 148 #23,520
2012 modern 138 #24,614
2013 modern 142 #24,547
2014 modern 144 #24,504
2015 modern 147 #24,036
2016 modern 145 #24,293

Geography

Back to top

Where Boarders are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around London parishes, Tring, St Albans or The Abbey and St Mary Islington. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Watford, Wycombe, North Dorset, South Somerset and Hartlepool. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 London parishes London 1
2 London parishes London 3
3 Tring Hertfordshire
4 St Albans or The Abbey Hertfordshire
5 St Mary Islington London (North Districts)

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Watford 004 Watford
2 Wycombe 022 Wycombe
3 North Dorset 001 North Dorset
4 South Somerset 022 South Somerset
5 Hartlepool 005 Hartlepool

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Boarder

These lists show first names that appear often with the Boarder surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Boarder

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Boarder, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Baseline UK

Group

Legacy Industrial and Coastal Communities

Nationally, the Boarder surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Legacy Industrial and Coastal Communities, within Baseline UK. This does not mean every Boarder household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Single-person households are common in these neighbourhoods, and these residents are typically divorced rather than never married. A high proportion of residents were born outside the UK in the EU. There are many young adults, some with young children, but relatively few residents are of normal retirement age or over. Although levels of identification with ethnic minorities are in line with the Supergroup average, individuals identifying with Mixed or Multiple ethnicities is more common than average. High long-term disability rates are observed, and unpaid care is more common than in the rest of the Group. The predominant housing types are terraced houses and flats, which are typically part of the social rented sector. This Group is commonly found in coastal areas and (present-day or former) industrial towns and cities.

Wider pattern

This Supergroup exemplifies the broad base to the UK’s social structure, encompassing as it does the average or modal levels of many neighbourhood characteristics, including all housing tenures, a range of levels of educational attainment and religious affiliations, and a variety of pre-retirement age structures. Yet, in combination, these mixes are each distinctive of the parts of the UK. Overall, terraced houses and flats are the most prevalent, as is employment in intermediate or low-skilled occupations. However, this Supergroup is also characterised by above average levels of unemployment and lower levels of use of English as the main language. Many neighbourhoods occur in south London and the UK’s other major urban centres.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Professional Employment and Family Lifecycles

Group

Established Homeowners with Children

Within London, Boarder is most associated with areas classed as Established Homeowners with Children, part of Professional Employment and Family Lifecycles. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These predominantly British-born residents are typically married/in civil partnerships and own the properties in which they are raising their children. Parents are typically over 45, and many other residents are beyond normal retirement age. Detached and semi-detached houses predominate and multiple car ownership is common.

Wider London pattern

These neighbourhoods house people of all ages, predominantly of White British or European extraction. Resident turnover is low. Religious affiliation is less common than average and tends to be Christian if expressed. Homeownership, typically of terraced houses, is common but use of the social rented sector is not. Employment is typically in professional, managerial and associate professional or technical occupations. There are few full-time students. Level 4 qualifications are common. More households lack dependent children than have them which, considered alongside low levels of crowding and over-all age structure, indicates that many households may be post child-rearing and in late middle age. Incidence of disability is low, as is residence in communal establishments.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Boarder is most concentrated in decile 10 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

10
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Boarder falls in decile 1 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

1
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Boarder is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of Over 70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

10
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Boarder, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Boarder families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Boarder surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Middlesex leads with 37 Boarders recorded in 1881 and an index of 3.08x.

County Total Index
Middlesex 37 3.08x
Buckinghamshire 20 27.57x
Hertfordshire 17 20.56x
Durham 10 2.80x
Bedfordshire 9 14.49x
Surrey 9 1.54x
Suffolk 6 4.11x
Yorkshire 6 0.50x
Lancashire 4 0.28x
Kent 1 0.24x
Leicestershire 1 0.75x
Renfrewshire 1 1.08x
Stirlingshire 1 2.26x
Warwickshire 1 0.33x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Hammersmith London in Middlesex leads with 23 Boarders recorded in 1881 and an index of 77.81x.

Place Total Index
Hammersmith London 23 77.81x
Bishopwearmouth 9 29.37x
Islington London 9 7.74x
Tring 7 316.74x
Billington 6 3529.41x
Camberwell 6 7.83x
Edlesborough 6 909.09x
Long Melford 6 441.18x
Marsworth 5 2631.58x
St Albans 5 295.86x
Aylesbury 4 124.61x
Puttenham 4 8000.00x
Ashton Under Lyne 3 9.64x
Marske In Guisbrough 3 142.18x
Chesham 2 74.91x
Ivinghoe 2 350.88x
Lambeth 2 1.91x
St George Bloomsbury 2 29.07x
Aston 1 1.20x
Barton Le Willows 1 909.09x
Biggleswade 1 49.26x
Brightside Bierlow 1 4.29x
Eaton Bray 1 158.73x
Hitchin 1 26.81x
Kilbarchan 1 35.46x
Kilsyth 1 35.46x
Leicester St Margaret 1 3.08x
Luton 1 9.30x
Rotherhithe 1 6.75x
Sheffield 1 2.64x
St George Hanover Square 1 4.73x
Westminster St James 1 8.11x
Westminster St Margaret 1 17.27x
Westoe 1 4.94x
Windle 1 12.48x
Wing 1 149.25x
Woolwich 1 6.61x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Boarder surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 5
Sarah 4
Ann 3
Eliza 3
Emma 3
Alice 2
Catherine 2
Charlotte 2
Elizabeth 2
Fanny 2
Jane 2
Janet 2
Kate 2
Ada 1
Anne 1
Annie 1
Caroline 1
Carrie 1
Edith 1
Eleanor 1
Elizth. 1
Emily 1
Fannie 1
Flora 1
Gertrude 1
Hannah 1
Helen 1
Lilian 1
Lizzie 1
Louisa 1
Lucy 1
Lydia 1
Mabel 1
Maria 1
Matilda 1
Phoebe 1
Rachael 1
Rachel 1
Roseanna 1
Ruth 1
Selina 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Boarder surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

FAQ

Boarder surname: questions and answers

How common was the Boarder surname in 1881?

In 1881, 123 people were recorded with the Boarder surname. That placed it at #17,506 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Boarder surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 145 in 2016. That gives Boarder a modern rank of #24,293.

What does the Boarder map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Boarder bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.