NameCensus.

UK surname

Burdekin

In the 1881 census there were 242 people recorded with the Burdekin surname, ranking it #11,333 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 225, ranked #18,105, down from #11,333 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Glossop, Halifax and Wakefield. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Amber Valley, Blackpool and Rhondda Cynon Taf.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Burdekin is 366 in 1911. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 7.0%.

1881 census count

242

Ranked #11,333

Modern count

225

2016, ranked #18,105

Peak year

1911

366 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Burdekin had 242 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #11,333 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 225 in 2016, ranked #18,105.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 366 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Ageing Communities.

Burdekin surname distribution map

The map shows where the Burdekin surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Burdekin surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Burdekin over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 188 #10,939
1861 historical 203 #11,865
1881 historical 242 #11,333
1891 historical 260 #12,367
1901 historical 348 #10,484
1911 historical 366 #9,936
1997 modern 236 #15,852
1998 modern 235 #16,358
1999 modern 246 #15,974
2000 modern 245 #15,955
2001 modern 245 #15,721
2002 modern 252 #15,714
2003 modern 231 #16,504
2004 modern 221 #17,066
2005 modern 210 #17,572
2006 modern 217 #17,349
2007 modern 220 #17,377
2008 modern 219 #17,597
2009 modern 222 #17,797
2010 modern 221 #18,205
2011 modern 220 #18,096
2012 modern 223 #17,852
2013 modern 229 #17,816
2014 modern 231 #17,813
2015 modern 228 #17,899
2016 modern 225 #18,105

Geography

Back to top

Where Burdekins are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Glossop, Halifax, Wakefield, Sheffield and London parishes. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Amber Valley, Blackpool, Rhondda Cynon Taf, Leeds and Cornwall. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Glossop Derbyshire
2 Halifax Yorkshire, West Riding
3 Wakefield Yorkshire, West Riding
4 Sheffield Yorkshire, West Riding
5 London parishes London 2

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Amber Valley 007 Amber Valley
2 Blackpool 012 Blackpool
3 Rhondda Cynon Taf 009 Rhondda Cynon Taf
4 Leeds 092 Leeds
5 Cornwall 002 Cornwall

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Burdekin

These lists show first names that appear often with the Burdekin surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Burdekin

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Burdekin, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Ageing Communities

Nationally, the Burdekin surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Ageing Communities, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Burdekin household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Many residents are of normal retirement age or above and live in communal establishments, and there are few dependent children. The dominant property type is a mix of retirement flats and detached houses. Those in work are likely to be employed in managerial and professional occupations, and many residents are educated to degree level. Levels of owner occupation are high, but the private rental sector is also present. Rural locations predominate.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

The Greater London Mix

Group

Skilled Trades and Construction Workers

Within London, Burdekin is most associated with areas classed as Skilled Trades and Construction Workers, part of The Greater London Mix. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These scattered, peripheral and often low residential density neighbourhoods house more workers in skilled trades and construction. Few households rent social housing and there are few students. Multiple car ownership is higher than the Supergroup average, perhaps because of poorer public transport connectivity. Incidence of mixed or multiple ethnicity is below the Supergroup average, and the absence of individuals identifying as Pakistani or Other Asian groups is also less pronounced. Flatted accommodation is less dominant than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

A Supergroup embodying London's diversity in many respects, apart from low numbers of residents identifying as of Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani or Other (non-Chinese) Asian ethnicity. There is lower than average prevalence of families with dependent children, while there are above average occurrences of never-married individuals and single-person households. The age distribution is skewed towards younger, single residents and couples without children, with many individuals identifying as of mixed or multiple ethnicity. Social rented or private rented housing is slightly more prevalent than average, and many residents live in flats. Individuals typically work in professional and associated roles in public administration, education or health rather than in elementary occupations in agriculture, energy, water, construction or manufacturing. Incidence of students is slightly below average. Individuals declaring no religion are more prevalent than average and non-use of English at home is below average.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Burdekin is most concentrated in decile 8 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

8
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Burdekin falls in decile 1 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

1
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Burdekin is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 25-30 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

5
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Burdekin, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Burdekin families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Burdekin surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Yorkshire leads with 80 Burdekins recorded in 1881 and an index of 3.42x.

County Total Index
Yorkshire 80 3.42x
Derbyshire 79 21.38x
Lancashire 52 1.86x
Middlesex 16 0.68x
Cheshire 13 2.49x
Nottinghamshire 1 0.31x
Sussex 1 0.25x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Glossop Dale in Derbyshire leads with 29 Burdekins recorded in 1881 and an index of 167.53x.

Place Total Index
Glossop Dale 29 167.53x
Ecclesall Bierlow 21 44.14x
Holbeck 15 96.77x
Beeley 10 3448.28x
Horbury 10 244.50x
Salford 10 12.14x
Cheetham 9 43.08x
Eyam 9 873.79x
York All Sts Pavement 9 3333.33x
Stockport 8 29.83x
Windle 8 50.76x
Mellor 7 700.00x
Northowram 7 42.68x
Beard 6 500.00x
Ovenden 6 57.64x
St Pancras London 6 3.16x
Hayfield 5 220.26x
Mirfield 5 38.94x
Radcliffe 5 37.04x
St Giles In Fields London 5 43.18x
Brightside Bierlow 4 8.72x
Chorlton On Medlock 4 8.99x
Foolow 4 2222.22x
Islington London 4 1.75x
Lytham 4 93.46x
Darley 3 201.34x
Everton 3 3.36x
Mottram 3 127.12x
Chapel En Le Frith 2 59.35x
Hollingworth 2 93.02x
Oldham 2 2.21x
Barrow In Furness 1 2.63x
Baslow With Bubnell 1 147.06x
Brighton 1 1.25x
Castleton 1 188.68x
Chorley 1 6.36x
Heaton Norris 1 6.27x
Layton With Warbreck 1 9.73x
Liverpool 1 0.59x
Lullington 1 166.67x
Manchester 1 0.79x
Newton 1 4.63x
Nottingham St Mary 1 1.22x
Peak Forest 1 250.00x
Pickering 1 33.90x
Sheffield 1 1.34x
St Marylebone London 1 0.79x
Tankersley 1 57.47x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Burdekin surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Burdekin surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 19
George 12
Joseph 12
William 12
Thomas 10
James 8
Benjamin 5
Samuel 5
Charles 4
Henry 4
Alfred 2
Arthur 2
Geo. 2
Herbert 2
Richard 2
Wm. 2
Adolphus 1
Albert 1
Anthony 1
Christopher 1
David 1
Emily 1
Ernest 1
Fred 1
Harry 1
Jesse 1
Joe 1
Josh. 1
Josiah 1
Robt. 1
Simeon 1
Tom 1
Walter 1

FAQ

Burdekin surname: questions and answers

How common was the Burdekin surname in 1881?

In 1881, 242 people were recorded with the Burdekin surname. That placed it at #11,333 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Burdekin surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 225 in 2016. That gives Burdekin a modern rank of #18,105.

What does the Burdekin map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Burdekin bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.