NameCensus.

UK surname

Burder

In the 1881 census there were 177 people recorded with the Burder surname, ranking it #13,889 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 161, ranked #22,606, down from #13,889 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Hedingham, Sible, St Mary and Braintree. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Swansea, Castle Point and Carmarthenshire.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Burder is 278 in 1891. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 9.0%.

1881 census count

177

Ranked #13,889

Modern count

161

2016, ranked #22,606

Peak year

1891

278 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Burder had 177 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #13,889 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 161 in 2016, ranked #22,606.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 278 in 1891.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Established but Challenged.

Burder surname distribution map

The map shows where the Burder surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Burder surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Burder over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 184 #11,120
1861 historical 194 #12,310
1881 historical 177 #13,889
1891 historical 278 #11,746
1901 historical 228 #13,929
1911 historical 255 #12,719
1997 modern 166 #19,797
1998 modern 165 #20,423
1999 modern 159 #21,030
2000 modern 163 #20,657
2001 modern 160 #20,616
2002 modern 170 #20,243
2003 modern 169 #20,092
2004 modern 169 #20,206
2005 modern 165 #20,468
2006 modern 171 #20,131
2007 modern 169 #20,562
2008 modern 170 #20,672
2009 modern 170 #21,095
2010 modern 167 #21,835
2011 modern 166 #21,745
2012 modern 165 #21,782
2013 modern 162 #22,433
2014 modern 160 #22,824
2015 modern 161 #22,599
2016 modern 161 #22,606

Geography

Back to top

Where Burders are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Hedingham, Sible, St Mary, Braintree, London parishes and Leigh. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Swansea, Castle Point, Carmarthenshire and Wyre. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Hedingham, Sible Essex
2 St Mary Pembrokeshire
3 Braintree Essex
4 London parishes London 1
5 Leigh Essex

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Swansea 005 Swansea
2 Swansea 007 Swansea
3 Castle Point 010 Castle Point
4 Carmarthenshire 025 Carmarthenshire
5 Wyre 005 Wyre

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Burder

These lists show first names that appear often with the Burder surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Burder

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Burder, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce

Group

Established but Challenged

Nationally, the Burder surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Established but Challenged, within Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce. This does not mean every Burder household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Many households in these neighbourhoods comprise separated or divorced single parents with dependent children. Residents are typically born in the UK, and these neighbourhoods have relatively few members of ethnic minorities. The prevalence of children, their parents and those at or above normal retirement age, suggests neighbourhood structures may be long-established. Levels of unpaid care are high, and long-term disability is more common than in the Supergroup as a whole. Use of the social rented sector is common, often in terraced houses. Levels of overcrowding are above the Supergroup average. Unemployment is high, while those in work are employed in elementary occupations such as caring, leisure and customer services. Many residents have low level qualifications. Neighbourhood concentrations of this Group are found in the South Wales Valleys, Belfast, Londonderry and the Central Lowlands of Scotland.

Wider pattern

Living in terraced or semi-detached houses, residents of these neighbourhoods typically lack high levels of education and work in elementary or routine service occupations. Unemployment is above average. Residents are predominantly born in the UK, and residents are also predominantly from ethnic minorities. Social (but not private sector) rented sector housing is common. This Supergroup is found throughout the UK’s conurbations and industrial regions but is also an integral part of smaller towns.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Young Families and Mainstream Employment

Group

Terraced and Semi-Detached Suburbs

Within London, Burder is most associated with areas classed as Terraced and Semi-Detached Suburbs, part of Young Families and Mainstream Employment. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Mainly concentrated in suburban areas, these terraced and semi-detached developments are less overcrowded than the Supergroup average, and resident households are more likely to own two or more cars. There are fewer residents aged 25-44, and a larger share of residents employed in administrative and secretarial occupations. Residents are more likely to have been born in the UK, less likely to have been born in the EU or Africa, and much less likely to self-identify as Bangladeshi.

Wider London pattern

Many families in these neighbourhoods have young children. Housing is principally in the social rented sector, in terraced or semi-detached units. While over-all residential densities are low, overcrowding is also prevalent locally. Residents are drawn from a range of ethnic minorities, with many identifying as Black and above average numbers born in Africa. Numbers identifying as of Chinese, Indian or White ethnicity are below average. Levels of proficiency in English are below average. Levels of separation or divorce and incidence of disability are both above average. Education is typically limited to Level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. Few residents work in professional or managerial occupations but the employment structure is otherwise diverse: it includes skilled trades, caring, leisure and other service occupations, sales and customer service occupations, construction, and work as process, plant, and machine operatives.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Burder is most concentrated in decile 2 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the less healthy end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

2
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Burder falls in decile 6 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

6
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Burder is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of Over 70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

10
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Burder, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Burder families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Burder surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Essex leads with 63 Burders recorded in 1881 and an index of 18.38x.

County Total Index
Essex 63 18.38x
Middlesex 26 1.50x
Kent 22 3.71x
Lancashire 14 0.68x
Pembrokeshire 9 16.31x
Sussex 8 2.73x
Leicestershire 6 3.12x
Wiltshire 5 3.26x
Yorkshire 5 0.29x
Gloucestershire 4 1.17x
Staffordshire 3 0.51x
Dorset 2 1.76x
Suffolk 2 0.95x
Surrey 2 0.24x
Warwickshire 2 0.46x
Cornwall 1 0.51x
Hampshire 1 0.28x
Northumberland 1 0.39x
Royal Navy 1 4.83x
Shropshire 1 0.67x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Chelmsford in Essex leads with 17 Burders recorded in 1881 and an index of 289.12x.

Place Total Index
Chelmsford 17 289.12x
Sible Hedingham 14 1217.39x
Dartford 10 165.02x
Folkestone 10 87.03x
Walthamstow 10 81.04x
Pembroke St Mary 9 126.58x
Loughborough 6 68.65x
Mile End Old Town London 6 16.24x
West Derby 6 9.96x
Leigh 5 420.17x
Shoreditch London 5 6.64x
Swindon 5 41.98x
Thornton In Bradford 5 87.26x
Barcombe 4 571.43x
Braintree 4 129.87x
Crumpsall 4 82.30x
Withington 4 60.24x
Battle 3 151.52x
Enfield 3 26.34x
St Pancras London 3 2.15x
Stoke Newington London 3 22.19x
Ulting 3 3000.00x
Wednesbury 3 20.48x
Westbury On Trym 3 26.00x
Writtle 3 214.29x
Clare 2 198.02x
Colchester St Giles 2 59.00x
Gestingthorpe 2 526.32x
Hackney London 2 2.05x
Leyton Low 2 28.69x
Monks Kirby 2 208.33x
Southwark Christchurch 2 24.57x
Tottenham 2 7.23x
Bocking 1 48.54x
Brighton 1 1.69x
East Lulworth 1 454.55x
Egloshayle 1 108.70x
Lewisham 1 3.17x
Northfleet 1 19.16x
Poole St James 1 23.36x
Portsea 1 1.43x
Royal Navy 1 5.65x
St George In East London 1 6.12x
Stapleton 1 15.48x
Sunbury 1 47.85x
Wem 1 44.84x
Westgate 1 6.25x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Burder surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 13
Elizabeth 7
Annie 4
Ellen 4
Harriet 4
Jane 4
Alice 3
Eliza 3
Sarah 3
Caroline 2
Clara 2
Elizth. 2
Emily 2
Emma 2
Harriett 2
Kate 2
Mabel 2
Maria 2
Amelia 1
Anna 1
Catharine 1
Constance 1
Edith 1
Elibeth 1
Ethel 1
Evelyn 1
Francis 1
Gertrude 1
Hannah 1
Helen 1
Infant 1
Isabel 1
Laura 1
Lillie 1
Louisa 1
Mahala 1
Margaret 1
Maud 1
Mina 1
Minie 1
Minnie 1
Muriel 1
Rose 1
S.C. 1
Susan 1
Susannah 1
Winifred 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Burder surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 12
Henry 10
John 7
Frederick 5
George 5
Charles 4
Walter 4
Albert 3
Alfred 3
Thomas 3
James 2
Joseph 2
Richard 2
Robert 2
Samuel 2
A.H. 1
Algernon 1
Alva 1
Amos 1
Arthur 1
Benjamin 1
Buithan 1
Chas. 1
E.J. 1
Edwey.? 1
Edwin 1
Eric 1
Frederic 1
Harold 1
Harry 1
Nephea 1
Reginall 1
Robt. 1
Sagar 1
Sidney 1

FAQ

Burder surname: questions and answers

How common was the Burder surname in 1881?

In 1881, 177 people were recorded with the Burder surname. That placed it at #13,889 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Burder surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 161 in 2016. That gives Burder a modern rank of #22,606.

What does the Burder map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Burder bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.