NameCensus.

UK surname

Burnaby

In the 1881 census there were 74 people recorded with the Burnaby surname, ranking it #23,062 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 16, ranked #36,998, down from #23,062 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Wilbarston, London parishes and Hull Holy Trinity. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Burnaby is 130 in 1891. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 78.4%.

1881 census count

74

Ranked #23,062

Modern count

16

2016, ranked #36,998

Peak year

1891

130 bearers

Map years

1

1891 to 1891

Key insights

  • Burnaby had 74 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #23,062 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 16 in 2016, ranked #36,998.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 130 in 1891.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is No data.

Burnaby surname distribution map

The map shows where the Burnaby surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Burnaby surname density by area, 1891 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Burnaby over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 91 #18,187
1861 historical 88 #22,554
1881 historical 74 #23,062
1891 historical 130 #20,173
1901 historical 75 #25,852
1911 historical 63 #26,537
1997 modern 25 #35,261
1998 modern 27 #35,148
1999 modern 26 #35,320
2000 modern 22 #35,684
2001 modern 22 #35,531
2002 modern 22 #35,709
2003 modern 20 #35,915
2004 modern 20 #36,053
2005 modern 21 #36,083
2006 modern 24 #35,981
2007 modern 25 #36,006
2008 modern 25 #36,072
2009 modern 24 #36,261
2010 modern 20 #36,599
2011 modern 18 #36,739
2012 modern 16 #36,897
2013 modern 16 #36,955
2014 modern 14 #37,161
2015 modern 15 #37,070
2016 modern 16 #36,998

Geography

Back to top

Where Burnabys are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Wilbarston, London parishes, Hull Holy Trinity and Rushton. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Wilbarston Leicestershire
2 London parishes London 1
3 Hull Holy Trinity Yorkshire, East Riding
4 London parishes London 3
5 Rushton Northamptonshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 No data No data

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Burnaby

These lists show first names that appear often with the Burnaby surname in historical and recent records.

Recent female names

No Forenames Found

Recent male names

No Forenames Found

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Burnaby

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Burnaby, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Nationally, the Burnaby surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Burnaby household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Within London, Burnaby is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Burnaby is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Burnaby, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Burnaby families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Burnaby surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Middlesex leads with 20 Burnabys recorded in 1881 and an index of 2.77x.

County Total Index
Middlesex 20 2.77x
Kent 10 4.06x
Hampshire 9 6.09x
Nottinghamshire 7 7.20x
Sussex 6 4.93x
Leicestershire 5 6.25x
Northamptonshire 4 5.89x
Perthshire 4 12.35x
Essex 2 1.40x
Surrey 2 0.57x
Yorkshire 2 0.28x
Hertfordshire 1 2.01x
Huntingdonshire 1 6.98x
Lancashire 1 0.12x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Lee in Kent leads with 7 Burnabys recorded in 1881 and an index of 196.08x.

Place Total Index
Lee 7 196.08x
St Marylebone London 7 18.17x
Brighton 6 24.45x
Forgandenny 4 2666.67x
East Retford 3 357.14x
Islington London 3 4.29x
Nottingham St Mary 3 11.92x
Odiham 3 461.54x
Southampton All Sts 3 118.11x
Folkestone 2 41.84x
Kensington London 2 4.99x
Lambeth 2 3.18x
Portsea 2 6.90x
St George Bloomsbury 2 48.31x
St George Hanover Square 2 15.74x
Stanley Cum Wrenthorpe 2 60.24x
Westminster St John 2 22.75x
Baldock 1 212.77x
Brampton 1 333.33x
Evington 1 909.09x
Frisby On The Wreake 1 1000.00x
Hulme 1 5.59x
Lewisham 1 7.62x
Millbrook 1 26.81x
Newark Upon Trent 1 28.57x
Northampton All Sts 1 43.48x
Northampton Priory St 1 24.57x
Paddington London 1 3.77x
Pytchley 1 714.29x
Shoreditch London 1 3.20x
Smeeton 1 1000.00x
Somerby 1 769.23x
Weeley 1 666.67x
West Ham 1 3.18x
Wilbarston In Kettering 1 5000.00x
Woodthorpe 1 10000.00x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Burnaby surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 6
Emily 3
Alice 2
Constance 2
Elizabeth 2
A.B.J. 1
Ada 1
Adelaide 1
Ann 1
Anna 1
Anne 1
Beatrice 1
Catherine 1
Charlotte 1
Christina 1
Emma 1
Esther 1
Ethel 1
Fredica 1
Gertrude 1
Harriett 1
Henrietta 1
Kitty 1
Louisa 1
Lucy 1
Margaret 1
Marian 1
Matilda 1
Maud 1
Minnie 1
Phillis 1
Rita 1
Rose 1
Sarah 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Burnaby surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 3
Charles 2
John 2
Robert 2
Thomas 2
Alexander 1
Alfred 1
Algernon 1
Chas. 1
Evelyn 1
Frederick 1
George 1
Harold 1
J. 1
J.F. 1
Nathaniel 1
Ralph 1
Richard 1
Sherard 1
Walter 1

FAQ

Burnaby surname: questions and answers

How common was the Burnaby surname in 1881?

In 1881, 74 people were recorded with the Burnaby surname. That placed it at #23,062 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Burnaby surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 16 in 2016. That gives Burnaby a modern rank of #36,998.

What does the Burnaby map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Burnaby bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.