NameCensus.

UK surname

Burnip

In the 1881 census there were 259 people recorded with the Burnip surname, ranking it #10,808 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 414, ranked #11,574, down from #10,808 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside, Gateshead and Brancepeth. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include County Durham and North Tyneside.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Burnip is 454 in 2010. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 59.8%.

1881 census count

259

Ranked #10,808

Modern count

414

2016, ranked #11,574

Peak year

2010

454 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Burnip had 259 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #10,808 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 414 in 2016, ranked #11,574.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 406 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Young Families in Industrial Towns.

Burnip surname distribution map

The map shows where the Burnip surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Burnip surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Burnip over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 124 #14,792
1861 historical 112 #19,279
1881 historical 259 #10,808
1891 historical 276 #11,810
1901 historical 355 #10,329
1911 historical 406 #9,196
1997 modern 409 #10,818
1998 modern 410 #11,143
1999 modern 429 #10,874
2000 modern 433 #10,750
2001 modern 418 #10,860
2002 modern 412 #11,192
2003 modern 409 #11,088
2004 modern 414 #11,005
2005 modern 411 #10,956
2006 modern 414 #10,946
2007 modern 432 #10,682
2008 modern 436 #10,710
2009 modern 438 #10,927
2010 modern 454 #10,833
2011 modern 451 #10,766
2012 modern 436 #10,940
2013 modern 416 #11,575
2014 modern 417 #11,632
2015 modern 419 #11,483
2016 modern 414 #11,574

Geography

Back to top

Where Burnips are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside, Gateshead, Brancepeth, Dalton-le-Dale and Easington. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to County Durham and North Tyneside. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside Durham
2 Gateshead Durham
3 Brancepeth Durham
4 Dalton-le-Dale Durham
5 Easington Durham

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 County Durham 038 County Durham
2 County Durham 023 County Durham
3 County Durham 019 County Durham
4 North Tyneside 030 North Tyneside
5 County Durham 011 County Durham

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Burnip

These lists show first names that appear often with the Burnip surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Burnip

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Burnip, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce

Group

Young Families in Industrial Towns

Nationally, the Burnip surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Young Families in Industrial Towns, within Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce. This does not mean every Burnip household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These neighbourhoods house predominantly young, UK-born individuals identifying with a White ethnic group with dependent children. Long-term disability and unpaid care are prevalent, and religious affiliations are uncommon. Housing is terraced or semi-detached and social rented sector housing is the norm. Unemployment is above the Supergroup average, and employment is principally in elementary occupations, as process plant and machine operatives, or in caring and leisure services. Educational attainment is low. The group is scattered throughout former industrial towns in the Midlands and the South Wales Valleys.

Wider pattern

Living in terraced or semi-detached houses, residents of these neighbourhoods typically lack high levels of education and work in elementary or routine service occupations. Unemployment is above average. Residents are predominantly born in the UK, and residents are also predominantly from ethnic minorities. Social (but not private sector) rented sector housing is common. This Supergroup is found throughout the UK’s conurbations and industrial regions but is also an integral part of smaller towns.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburban Asian Communities

Group

Settled Semi-Detached Asians

Within London, Burnip is most associated with areas classed as Settled Semi-Detached Asians, part of Suburban Asian Communities. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These residents share Supergroup characteristics of large (non-Chinese) Asian populations but those identifying as Bangladeshi are notably absent. Many residents were born in the UK, while other more recent migrants have African birthplaces. Semi-detached housing, much of it owner occupied, prevails in these suburban residential locations.

Wider London pattern

Many residents of these neighbourhoods are of (non-Chinese) Asian descent, with many identifying as Indian, Pakistani or Bangladeshi. Neighbourhoods are located across large areas of suburban west, north-east and south London. Detached, semi-detached and terraced houses are more prevalent than flats and socially rented housing is uncommon. Few residents live in communal establishments. Many families have dependent children, sometimes in overcrowded accommodation, and few households are ethnically mixed. Marriage rates are above the London average. The even age distribution, relative absence of individuals living alone and frequent incidence of households with children suggests that multi-generation households may be relatively common. Employment is often in skilled trades, elementary, sales and customer service occupations, and roles as process, plant, and machine operatives. Manufacturing and construction are well represented, along with employment in distribution, hotels, and restaurants. Many adults have only level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. English is not used at home by some residents. Religious affiliation is above average.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Burnip is most concentrated in decile 1 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the less healthy end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

1
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Burnip falls in decile 3 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

3
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Burnip is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 25-30 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

5
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Burnip, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Burnip families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Burnip surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Durham leads with 204 Burnips recorded in 1881 and an index of 26.93x.

County Total Index
Durham 204 26.93x
Northumberland 23 6.07x
Lincolnshire 16 3.93x
Yorkshire 12 0.48x
Kent 3 0.35x
Middlesex 2 0.08x
Cumberland 1 0.46x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Gateshead in Durham leads with 22 Burnips recorded in 1881 and an index of 38.79x.

Place Total Index
Gateshead 22 38.79x
Haswell 20 368.32x
Dawdon 15 160.94x
Esh 14 254.08x
Conside Knitsley 12 203.74x
Medomsley 11 311.61x
Kyo 8 224.09x
Ryhope 8 152.09x
Stockley 8 833.33x
Tanfield 8 88.79x
West Butterwick With 8 1269.84x
Chirton 7 81.68x
St Giles 7 147.99x
Crook Billy Row 6 61.86x
East Murton 6 422.54x
Newcastle On Tyne St 6 30.55x
Easington 5 454.55x
Elvet 5 91.41x
Epworth 5 263.16x
Hedworth Monkton Jarrow 5 15.24x
Monkwearmouth Shore 5 33.83x
Thornaby 5 53.02x
Crossgate 4 120.85x
Hutton Henry 4 251.57x
Middlesbrough 4 12.18x
Muggleswick 4 547.95x
Newcastle On Tyne All Sts 4 17.68x
Quarrington 4 1379.31x
Stockton On Tees 4 10.96x
Chester Le Street 3 51.55x
Holy Trinity 3 4.94x
Brandon Byshottles 2 21.07x
Garthorpe 2 408.16x
Hamsterley 2 465.12x
Helmington Row 2 56.66x
Newcastle On Tyne St John 2 40.16x
Poplar London 2 4.16x
Rochester St Margaret 2 21.83x
Washington 2 62.89x
Winlaton 2 27.51x
Wolsingham 2 28.99x
Woodham 2 1538.46x
Bishop Auckland 1 9.84x
Darlington 1 3.42x
Deptford St Paul 1 1.49x
Earsdon 1 32.47x
Hexham 1 17.06x
St Swithin Lincoln 1 15.63x
Tynemouth 1 4.93x
Westgate 1 4.26x
Wetheral 1 34.48x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Burnip surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Burnip surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 29
Thomas 16
William 14
James 12
Joseph 9
George 7
Robert 7
Charles 6
Stephen 4
Albert 2
Anthony 2
Cuthbert 2
Matthew 2
Michael 2
Richard 2
Alfred 1
Ernest 1
Foster 1
Fred 1
Frederick 1
Jonathan 1
Jonothan 1
Jos. 1
Matt.Hy. 1
Paul 1
Percivell 1
Robt. 1
Septimus 1
Spencer 1
Thos. 1
Tom 1
Willm. 1
Wm. 1

FAQ

Burnip surname: questions and answers

How common was the Burnip surname in 1881?

In 1881, 259 people were recorded with the Burnip surname. That placed it at #10,808 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Burnip surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 414 in 2016. That gives Burnip a modern rank of #11,574.

What does the Burnip map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Burnip bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.