NameCensus.

UK surname

Byott

In the 1881 census there were 39 people recorded with the Byott surname, ranking it #28,137 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 131, ranked #26,004, up from #28,137 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to No data. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Stafford, Tower Hamlets and Liverpool.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Byott is 141 in 2011. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 235.9%.

1881 census count

39

Ranked #28,137

Modern count

131

2016, ranked #26,004

Peak year

2011

141 bearers

Map years

3

1998 to 2016

Key insights

  • Byott had 39 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #28,137 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 131 in 2016, ranked #26,004.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 80 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Challenged Communities.

Byott surname distribution map

The map shows where the Byott surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Byott surname density by area, 2016 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Byott over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 42 #25,706
1861 historical 32 #29,944
1881 historical 39 #28,137
1891 historical 59 #29,325
1901 historical 66 #26,794
1911 historical 80 #24,821
1997 modern 117 #24,553
1998 modern 126 #24,094
1999 modern 130 #23,805
2000 modern 131 #23,672
2001 modern 128 #23,665
2002 modern 129 #24,021
2003 modern 123 #24,497
2004 modern 124 #24,559
2005 modern 120 #25,066
2006 modern 121 #25,133
2007 modern 132 #24,166
2008 modern 129 #24,790
2009 modern 136 #24,485
2010 modern 140 #24,569
2011 modern 141 #24,294
2012 modern 137 #24,731
2013 modern 136 #25,252
2014 modern 134 #25,711
2015 modern 131 #25,979
2016 modern 131 #26,004

Geography

Back to top

Where Byotts are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around No data. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Stafford, Tower Hamlets, Liverpool and Havering. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 No data No data

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Stafford 015 Stafford
2 Tower Hamlets 017 Tower Hamlets
3 Liverpool 014 Liverpool
4 Havering 027 Havering
5 Liverpool 010 Liverpool

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Byott

These lists show first names that appear often with the Byott surname in historical and recent records.

Historical female names

No Forenames Found

Historical male names

No Forenames Found

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Byott

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Byott, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Baseline UK

Group

Challenged Communities

Nationally, the Byott surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Challenged Communities, within Baseline UK. This does not mean every Byott household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Residents of these neighbourhoods typically live in households with dependent children, and there are fewer-than-average residents of normal retirement age or over. Identification with ethnic minorities, particularly Black, or Mixed or Multiple ethnicities is common. The rate of Christian religious affiliation is low. Housing predominantly consists of semi-detached houses, along with a significant number of terraced properties and flats. Overcrowded social housing is common, and private renting occurs at average UK levels. Those in employment work mainly in caring leisure and other services; process, plant and machine operation; or elementary occupations. Unemployment is high, and few individuals have degree level qualifications. Many of these neighbourhoods occur in commuter towns or less accessible areas of larger towns and cities.

Wider pattern

This Supergroup exemplifies the broad base to the UK’s social structure, encompassing as it does the average or modal levels of many neighbourhood characteristics, including all housing tenures, a range of levels of educational attainment and religious affiliations, and a variety of pre-retirement age structures. Yet, in combination, these mixes are each distinctive of the parts of the UK. Overall, terraced houses and flats are the most prevalent, as is employment in intermediate or low-skilled occupations. However, this Supergroup is also characterised by above average levels of unemployment and lower levels of use of English as the main language. Many neighbourhoods occur in south London and the UK’s other major urban centres.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs

Group

London Fringe

Within London, Byott is most associated with areas classed as London Fringe, part of Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Predominantly located in neighbourhoods on the outskirts of Greater London, residents of these neighbourhoods typically have their highest qualifications below degree (Level 4) level, with those still in work engaged in skilled trades and occupations in distribution, hotels and restaurants. There is low ethnic diversity in these neighbourhoods and high levels of Christian religious affiliation. Detached or terraced houses predominate, often with spare rooms.

Wider London pattern

The age distribution of these neighbourhoods is skewed towards the middle-aged and old, although few residents live alone or in communal establishments and numbers of dependent children are around average. Owner occupation is the norm, as is residence in detached or semi-detached houses. Residential densities are low and many households have spare rooms. Most residents were born in the UK and, aside from some identifying as members of Chinese or Indian ethnicities, identify as White. Mixed ethnicity households are rare. Incidence of married couples is higher than average and few individuals have never been married. A large proportion of individuals still in employment work in administrative and secretarial occupations, or in the construction industry. Few residents are students, and many households own more than one car.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Byott is most concentrated in decile 10 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

10
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Byott falls in decile 6 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

6
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Byott is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of Over 70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

10
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Byott, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Byott families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Byott surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Hertfordshire leads with 21 Byotts recorded in 1881 and an index of 78.13x.

County Total Index
Hertfordshire 21 78.13x
Middlesex 15 3.85x
Angus 1 2.77x
Northamptonshire 1 2.73x
Northumberland 1 1.72x
Royal Navy 1 21.51x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Broxbourne in Hertfordshire leads with 12 Byotts recorded in 1881 and an index of 2264.15x.

Place Total Index
Broxbourne 12 2264.15x
Shoreditch London 7 41.40x
Hertford St John 5 1250.00x
Clerkenwell London 3 32.57x
Little Amwell 3 3333.33x
Edmonton 2 63.69x
St Luke London 2 31.95x
Bethnal Green London 1 5.90x
Glamis 1 454.55x
Newcastle On Tyne All Sts 1 28.82x
Royal Navy 1 25.19x
Wansford 1 5000.00x
Ware 1 129.87x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Byott surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Annie 2
Mary 2
Caroline 1
Cecilia 1
Elen 1
Elenor 1
Elizabeth 1
Emily 1
Emma 1
Harriet 1
Jane 1
Lucy 1
Marie 1
Nena 1
Sarah 1
Susan 1
Susannah 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Byott surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 5
William 4
Charles 3
Henry 2
Benjamin 1
George 1
Herbert 1
Robert 1
Thos. 1
Wm. 1

Top occupations

Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in Byott households.

FAQ

Byott surname: questions and answers

How common was the Byott surname in 1881?

In 1881, 39 people were recorded with the Byott surname. That placed it at #28,137 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Byott surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 131 in 2016. That gives Byott a modern rank of #26,004.

What does the Byott map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Byott bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.