NameCensus.

UK surname

Coath

In the 1881 census there were 154 people recorded with the Coath surname, ranking it #15,259 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 185, ranked #20,652, down from #15,259 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to London parishes, Tunbridge, Bidborough and Liskeard, St Cleer. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include East Devon, South Somerset and Plymouth.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Coath is 226 in 1999. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 20.1%.

1881 census count

154

Ranked #15,259

Modern count

185

2016, ranked #20,652

Peak year

1999

226 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Coath had 154 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #15,259 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 185 in 2016, ranked #20,652.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 183 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Ageing Communities.

Coath surname distribution map

The map shows where the Coath surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Coath surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Coath over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 132 #14,174
1861 historical 126 #17,569
1881 historical 154 #15,259
1891 historical 143 #18,920
1901 historical 174 #16,520
1911 historical 183 #15,811
1997 modern 209 #17,157
1998 modern 215 #17,306
1999 modern 226 #16,884
2000 modern 223 #16,978
2001 modern 213 #17,267
2002 modern 215 #17,487
2003 modern 198 #18,252
2004 modern 196 #18,438
2005 modern 184 #19,117
2006 modern 196 #18,512
2007 modern 202 #18,359
2008 modern 199 #18,699
2009 modern 196 #19,274
2010 modern 207 #19,007
2011 modern 191 #19,871
2012 modern 176 #20,915
2013 modern 188 #20,352
2014 modern 184 #20,809
2015 modern 183 #20,786
2016 modern 185 #20,652

Geography

Back to top

Where Coaths are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around London parishes, Tunbridge, Bidborough, Liskeard, St Cleer, Lansalloes and Calstock. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to East Devon, South Somerset, Plymouth and Teignbridge. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 London parishes London 1
2 Tunbridge, Bidborough Kent
3 Liskeard, St Cleer Cornwall
4 Lansalloes Cornwall
5 Calstock Cornwall

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 East Devon 005 East Devon
2 South Somerset 022 South Somerset
3 Plymouth 011 Plymouth
4 Teignbridge 003 Teignbridge
5 South Somerset 023 South Somerset

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Coath

These lists show first names that appear often with the Coath surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Coath

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Coath, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Ageing Communities

Nationally, the Coath surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Ageing Communities, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Coath household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Many residents are of normal retirement age or above and live in communal establishments, and there are few dependent children. The dominant property type is a mix of retirement flats and detached houses. Those in work are likely to be employed in managerial and professional occupations, and many residents are educated to degree level. Levels of owner occupation are high, but the private rental sector is also present. Rural locations predominate.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Young Families and Mainstream Employment

Group

Social Rented Sector and Diverse Origins

Within London, Coath is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector and Diverse Origins, part of Young Families and Mainstream Employment. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Scattered across London’s Inner and Outer suburbs, residents of these neighbourhoods are typically housed in the social rented sector. Although terraced and semi-detached houses predominate, more residents live in flats than elsewhere in the Supergroup. Neighbourhoods are more ethnically diverse than the Supergroup average. Those identifying as of Bangladeshi, Pakistani and some Black ethnicities are more prevalent. Europeans born in a overseas non-EU countries make up more of the lower proportion of residents identifying as White. Few residents are very old (85+). Employment in distribution, hotels and restaurants is more common than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

Many families in these neighbourhoods have young children. Housing is principally in the social rented sector, in terraced or semi-detached units. While over-all residential densities are low, overcrowding is also prevalent locally. Residents are drawn from a range of ethnic minorities, with many identifying as Black and above average numbers born in Africa. Numbers identifying as of Chinese, Indian or White ethnicity are below average. Levels of proficiency in English are below average. Levels of separation or divorce and incidence of disability are both above average. Education is typically limited to Level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. Few residents work in professional or managerial occupations but the employment structure is otherwise diverse: it includes skilled trades, caring, leisure and other service occupations, sales and customer service occupations, construction, and work as process, plant, and machine operatives.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Coath is most concentrated in decile 9 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

9
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Coath falls in decile 8 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the less deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

8
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Coath is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of Over 70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

10
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Coath, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Coath families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Coath surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Cornwall leads with 44 Coaths recorded in 1881 and an index of 25.87x.

County Total Index
Cornwall 44 25.87x
Devon 33 10.55x
Middlesex 28 1.86x
Fife 9 10.12x
Durham 8 1.79x
Staffordshire 6 1.18x
Cheshire 5 1.51x
Lancashire 5 0.28x
Gloucestershire 4 1.36x
Surrey 4 0.55x
Kent 3 0.59x
Midlothian 2 0.99x
Hampshire 1 0.32x
Leicestershire 1 0.60x
Warwickshire 1 0.26x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Liskeard in Cornwall leads with 20 Coaths recorded in 1881 and an index of 701.75x.

Place Total Index
Liskeard 20 701.75x
Plymouth Charles The 12 87.08x
St George Hanover Square 12 45.33x
Plymouth St Andrew 11 45.66x
Dunfermline 9 65.84x
Lansallos 8 2162.16x
Calstock 7 209.58x
Bishopwearmouth 5 13.03x
Chelsea London 5 11.04x
Islington London 5 3.43x
Talland 5 1250.00x
Walsall Foreign 5 19.09x
Bristol St Michael 4 158.10x
Cornwood 4 666.67x
Edmonton 4 33.06x
Birkenhead 3 11.35x
Liverpool 3 2.77x
Rotherhithe 3 16.16x
Stockton On Tees 3 13.93x
East Stonehouse 2 32.47x
Edinburgh St Cuthberts 2 2.47x
Greasby 2 1818.18x
Maker 2 127.39x
St Blazey 2 134.23x
Aldershot 1 9.70x
Bow London 1 5.23x
Chorlton On Medlock 1 3.53x
Exeter St Martin 1 1000.00x
Gillingham 1 9.46x
Kirkdale 1 3.33x
Leicester All Sts 1 30.58x
Northfleet 1 22.12x
Plympton St Mary 1 55.25x
Plymstock 1 60.98x
Polesworth 1 55.56x
Southwark Christchurch 1 14.20x
Stoke Newington London 1 8.55x
Tavistock 1 28.09x
Tonbridge 1 5.41x
Wednesbury 1 7.89x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Coath surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 12
Elizabeth 7
Jane 6
Emma 4
Amelia 3
Agnes 2
Eliza 2
Ellen 2
Margaret 2
Maud 2
Sarah 2
Susan 2
Ada 1
Amy 1
Anne 1
Annie 1
Beatrice 1
Betrice 1
Caroline 1
Eda 1
Elsie 1
Helena 1
Henrietta 1
Jessie 1
Joannah 1
Johannah 1
Kitty 1
Leonora 1
Lidia 1
Louisa 1
Lydia 1
Mabel 1
Mable 1
Mildred 1
Thiza 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Coath surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 19
John 12
Robert 5
George 4
Thomas 4
Edward 3
Adolphus 2
Charles 2
Ernest 2
Joseph 2
Lewis 2
Walter 2
Alexander 1
Alfred 1
Arthur 1
Authur 1
Daniel 1
Erwin 1
Frank 1
Herbert 1
Hezekiah 1
Humphrey 1
Jabez 1
James 1
Maria 1
Percy 1
Sidney 1

FAQ

Coath surname: questions and answers

How common was the Coath surname in 1881?

In 1881, 154 people were recorded with the Coath surname. That placed it at #15,259 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Coath surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 185 in 2016. That gives Coath a modern rank of #20,652.

What does the Coath map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Coath bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.