NameCensus.

UK surname

Crack

In the 1881 census there were 378 people recorded with the Crack surname, ranking it #8,288 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 286, ranked #15,240, down from #8,288 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Saxham, Great, London parishes and Chedburgh. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Welwyn Hatfield, St Edmundsbury and Bournemouth.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Crack is 484 in 1911. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 24.3%.

1881 census count

378

Ranked #8,288

Modern count

286

2016, ranked #15,240

Peak year

1911

484 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Crack had 378 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #8,288 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 286 in 2016, ranked #15,240.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 484 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Rural Amenity.

Crack surname distribution map

The map shows where the Crack surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Crack surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Crack over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 388 #6,190
1861 historical 354 #7,224
1881 historical 378 #8,288
1891 historical 437 #8,251
1901 historical 456 #8,624
1911 historical 484 #8,026
1997 modern 340 #12,428
1998 modern 335 #12,915
1999 modern 342 #12,829
2000 modern 349 #12,585
2001 modern 334 #12,789
2002 modern 343 #12,803
2003 modern 312 #13,467
2004 modern 303 #13,812
2005 modern 291 #14,105
2006 modern 288 #14,267
2007 modern 301 #14,022
2008 modern 301 #14,107
2009 modern 303 #14,315
2010 modern 302 #14,661
2011 modern 308 #14,356
2012 modern 313 #14,095
2013 modern 318 #14,160
2014 modern 296 #14,982
2015 modern 294 #14,971
2016 modern 286 #15,240

Geography

Back to top

Where Cracks are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Saxham, Great, London parishes, Chedburgh, St Mary and Rushbrook. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Welwyn Hatfield, St Edmundsbury, Bournemouth and Huntingdonshire. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Saxham, Great Suffolk
2 London parishes London 3
3 Chedburgh Suffolk
4 St Mary Suffolk
5 Rushbrook Suffolk

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Welwyn Hatfield 013 Welwyn Hatfield
2 St Edmundsbury 004 St Edmundsbury
3 Bournemouth 019 Bournemouth
4 Huntingdonshire 004 Huntingdonshire
5 St Edmundsbury 007 St Edmundsbury

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Crack

These lists show first names that appear often with the Crack surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Crack

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Crack, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Rural Amenity

Nationally, the Crack surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Rural Amenity, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Crack household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group comprises older parents or retirees, with no resident dependent children, and with the lowest residential densities in this Supergroup. Predominantly UK-born, residents typically live in detached houses, although others do live in semi-detached and terraced properties. The level of multiple car ownership is the highest in this Supergroup. Most houses are owner occupied although social renting is also present. Many concentrations occur in high amenity rural locations, such as Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Young Families and Mainstream Employment

Group

Social Rented Sector and Diverse Origins

Within London, Crack is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector and Diverse Origins, part of Young Families and Mainstream Employment. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Scattered across London’s Inner and Outer suburbs, residents of these neighbourhoods are typically housed in the social rented sector. Although terraced and semi-detached houses predominate, more residents live in flats than elsewhere in the Supergroup. Neighbourhoods are more ethnically diverse than the Supergroup average. Those identifying as of Bangladeshi, Pakistani and some Black ethnicities are more prevalent. Europeans born in a overseas non-EU countries make up more of the lower proportion of residents identifying as White. Few residents are very old (85+). Employment in distribution, hotels and restaurants is more common than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

Many families in these neighbourhoods have young children. Housing is principally in the social rented sector, in terraced or semi-detached units. While over-all residential densities are low, overcrowding is also prevalent locally. Residents are drawn from a range of ethnic minorities, with many identifying as Black and above average numbers born in Africa. Numbers identifying as of Chinese, Indian or White ethnicity are below average. Levels of proficiency in English are below average. Levels of separation or divorce and incidence of disability are both above average. Education is typically limited to Level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. Few residents work in professional or managerial occupations but the employment structure is otherwise diverse: it includes skilled trades, caring, leisure and other service occupations, sales and customer service occupations, construction, and work as process, plant, and machine operatives.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Crack is most concentrated in decile 5 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

5
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Crack falls in decile 6 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

6
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Crack is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Crack, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Crack families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Crack surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Suffolk leads with 187 Cracks recorded in 1881 and an index of 41.53x.

County Total Index
Suffolk 187 41.53x
Middlesex 63 1.70x
Surrey 24 1.33x
Yorkshire 19 0.52x
Kent 14 1.11x
Cambridgeshire 13 5.55x
Essex 12 1.64x
Norfolk 12 2.11x
Lancashire 6 0.14x
Durham 5 0.45x
Warwickshire 4 0.43x
Lincolnshire 3 0.51x
Gloucestershire 2 0.28x
Hampshire 2 0.26x
Northumberland 2 0.36x
Somerset 2 0.34x
Staffordshire 2 0.16x
Berkshire 1 0.36x
Derbyshire 1 0.17x
Glamorgan 1 0.16x
Lanarkshire 1 0.08x
Northamptonshire 1 0.29x
Pembrokeshire 1 0.85x
Royal Navy 1 2.27x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Barrow in Suffolk leads with 39 Cracks recorded in 1881 and an index of 3391.30x.

Place Total Index
Barrow 39 3391.30x
St Pancras London 25 8.40x
Horringer 22 2619.05x
Great Saxham 17 5666.67x
Rushbrooke 16 9411.76x
Great Barton 14 1346.15x
Lambeth 12 3.72x
Newmarket St Mary 12 346.82x
Great Livermere 10 2857.14x
Bury St Edmunds St James 9 74.81x
Islington London 9 2.51x
Burwell 8 284.70x
Bocking 7 159.45x
Bury St Edmunds St Mary 7 82.84x
Chedburgh 7 2187.50x
Hampstead London 7 12.16x
Lowestoft 7 32.91x
Rattlesden 7 530.30x
Great Bookham 6 434.78x
Market Weston 6 1621.62x
Stoke Newington London 6 20.83x
Bowling 5 13.78x
Bishopwearmouth 4 4.24x
Chatham 4 11.53x
Deptford St Paul 4 4.11x
East Harling 4 296.30x
Saddleworth 4 14.15x
St Clement Cambridge 4 412.37x
West Derby 4 3.12x
West Ham 4 2.48x
Willoughby 4 1025.64x
Holbeck 3 12.36x
Hunslet 3 5.25x
Redgrave 3 422.54x
Thetford St Peter 3 200.00x
Wandsworth 3 8.43x
Attleborough 2 69.69x
Bradford 2 2.26x
Burton Upon Trent 2 6.85x
Charlton Kings 2 39.84x
Cobham 2 172.41x
Ealing 2 6.05x
Elswick 2 4.56x
Folkestone 2 8.17x
Frome 2 14.05x
Harefield 2 105.26x
Hargrave 2 377.36x
Kensington London 2 0.97x
Kettleburgh 2 540.54x
Leeds 2 0.97x
Rickinghall Superior 2 277.78x
St George Hanover Square 2 3.07x
Westminster St James 2 5.26x
Wrentham 2 160.00x
Alverstoke 1 3.65x
Birtley 1 22.27x
Bottisham 1 50.25x
Bourn 1 20.96x
Camberwell 1 0.42x
Castlemartin 1 200.00x
Chelsea London 1 0.90x
Coney Weston 1 400.00x
Fishtoft 1 86.21x
Fulwood 1 21.10x
Gillingham 1 3.84x
Grantham 1 12.99x
Hopton 1 90.09x
Hordle 1 75.76x
Limehouse London 1 2.46x
Litchurch 1 4.29x
New Windsor 1 10.72x
Oldham 1 0.71x
Paddington London 1 0.74x
Royal Navy 1 2.66x
St Clement Danes London 1 13.07x
Streatham 1 3.65x
Swansea Town 1 1.89x
Thompson 1 217.39x
Tonbridge 1 2.20x
Walthamstow 1 3.81x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Crack surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 22
Elizabeth 13
Sarah 11
Emma 9
Alice 7
Ann 6
Ellen 5
Emily 5
Jane 5
Susan 5
Harriet 4
Harriett 4
Jessie 4
Kate 4
Laura 4
Ada 3
Edith 3
Eliza 3
Maria 3
Agnes 2
Amelia 2
Annie 2
Caroline 2
Frances 2
Hannah 2
Helen 2
Julia 2
Lilian 2
Louisa 2
Lucy 2
Margaret 2
Martha 2
Amy 1
Carone 1
Catherine 1
Charles 1
Charlotte 1
Ethel 1
Etty 1
Eva 1
Fanny 1
Flora 1
Georgiania 1
Gordon 1
Jessie. 1
Jessy 1
Judith 1
Larssia 1
Lousia 1
Thirza 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Crack surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
George 24
William 20
John 16
James 14
Charles 12
Henry 11
Thomas 11
Joseph 8
Edward 7
Walter 7
Albert 6
Alfred 4
David 4
Frederick 4
Harry 4
Herbert 4
Robert 3
Arthur 2
Fred 2
Geo. 2
Richard 2
Ambrose 1
Amos 1
Arther 1
Auther 1
Ben 1
Benjamin 1
Edwd. 1
Ernest 1
Frank 1
Fredrick 1
Horace 1
Jonathan 1
Luke 1
Mark 1
Nicholas 1
Oliver 1
Reuben 1
Richd. 1
Robt.Alfred 1
Samuel 1
Simon 1
Thos. 1
Wallace 1
Willie 1

FAQ

Crack surname: questions and answers

How common was the Crack surname in 1881?

In 1881, 378 people were recorded with the Crack surname. That placed it at #8,288 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Crack surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 286 in 2016. That gives Crack a modern rank of #15,240.

What does the Crack map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Crack bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.