NameCensus.

UK surname

Erith

In the 1881 census there were 92 people recorded with the Erith surname, ranking it #20,709 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 86, ranked #32,570, down from #20,709 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Bristol City: St Mary Redcliff, Dover St James, Dover St Mary and St John Hackney. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Mid Suffolk, Westminster and Cornwall.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Erith is 120 in 1891. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 6.5%.

1881 census count

92

Ranked #20,709

Modern count

86

2016, ranked #32,570

Peak year

1891

120 bearers

Map years

2

1861 to 1891

Key insights

  • Erith had 92 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #20,709 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 86 in 2016, ranked #32,570.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 120 in 1891.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Rural Amenity.

Erith surname distribution map

The map shows where the Erith surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Erith surname density by area, 1891 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Erith over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 62 #22,232
1861 historical 117 #18,635
1881 historical 92 #20,709
1891 historical 120 #21,292
1901 historical 93 #23,689
1911 historical 97 #23,076
1997 modern 108 #25,788
1998 modern 99 #27,785
1999 modern 98 #28,050
2000 modern 93 #28,701
2001 modern 93 #28,382
2002 modern 97 #28,383
2003 modern 96 #28,381
2004 modern 98 #28,297
2005 modern 94 #28,973
2006 modern 91 #29,725
2007 modern 92 #29,929
2008 modern 92 #30,286
2009 modern 87 #31,489
2010 modern 85 #32,185
2011 modern 82 #32,449
2012 modern 88 #32,064
2013 modern 88 #32,349
2014 modern 85 #32,743
2015 modern 85 #32,693
2016 modern 86 #32,570

Geography

Back to top

Where Eriths are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Bristol City: St Mary Redcliff, Dover St James, Dover St Mary, St John Hackney, St Marylebone and St John Hampstead. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Mid Suffolk, Westminster, Cornwall and Helensburgh West and Rhu. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Bristol City: St Mary Redcliff Gloucestershire
2 Dover St James, Dover St Mary Kent
3 St John Hackney London (North Districts)
4 St Marylebone London (North Districts)
5 St John Hampstead London (North Districts)

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Mid Suffolk 002 Mid Suffolk
2 Westminster 020 Westminster
3 Cornwall 023 Cornwall
4 Helensburgh West and Rhu Argyll and Bute
5 Cornwall 017 Cornwall

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Erith

These lists show first names that appear often with the Erith surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Erith

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Erith, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Rural Amenity

Nationally, the Erith surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Rural Amenity, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Erith household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group comprises older parents or retirees, with no resident dependent children, and with the lowest residential densities in this Supergroup. Predominantly UK-born, residents typically live in detached houses, although others do live in semi-detached and terraced properties. The level of multiple car ownership is the highest in this Supergroup. Most houses are owner occupied although social renting is also present. Many concentrations occur in high amenity rural locations, such as Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Central Connected Professionals and Managers

Group

City Support Workers

Within London, Erith is most associated with areas classed as City Support Workers, part of Central Connected Professionals and Managers. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Scattered throughout Inner London, these areas house relatively few workers in the most senior roles within organisations, and greater prevalence of administrative roles relative to the Supergroup mean. Residents are less likely to be of Chinese ethnicity and are more likely to have been born in Africa. Relative to the Supergroup average, residents are also more likely to live in social housing and live in overcrowded conditions.

Wider London pattern

Adult residents of these neighbourhoods are typically aged 25 to 44, working full-time in professional, managerial or associate professional occupations. There are few families with dependent children. The predominantly Inner London neighbourhoods have an international character, including many residents born elsewhere in Europe alongside high numbers of individuals identifying as of Chinese ethnicity. Many individuals are never married, childless and/or living alone. Above average numbers of individuals, likely to be full-time students, live in communal establishments. Elsewhere, privately rented flats are the dominant housing type. Residents of these areas are well-qualified, with a significant number holding Level 4 or above qualifications. There is a correspondingly high level of individuals employed full-time in professional, managerial and associated professional or technical occupations. Employing industries are financial, real estate, professional, administration, and, to a lesser degree, transport and communications. Unemployment is uncommon.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Erith is most concentrated in decile 6 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

6
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Erith falls in decile 7 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

7
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Erith is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 15-20 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

3
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Erith, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Erith families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Erith surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Middlesex leads with 43 Eriths recorded in 1881 and an index of 4.69x.

County Total Index
Middlesex 43 4.69x
Kent 28 8.95x
Suffolk 10 8.96x
Essex 4 2.21x
Hampshire 3 1.60x
Channel Islands 2 7.36x
Sussex 2 1.29x
Cambridgeshire 1 1.72x
Surrey 1 0.22x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. St Marylebone London in Middlesex leads with 15 Eriths recorded in 1881 and an index of 30.65x.

Place Total Index
St Marylebone London 15 30.65x
Hackney London 14 27.24x
Dover St James 12 875.91x
Bury St Edmunds St Mary 10 476.19x
Dover St Mary Virgin 6 198.02x
Hampstead London 4 28.01x
Shoreditch London 4 10.07x
Stebbing 4 1142.86x
Deptford St Paul 3 12.44x
Hound 3 234.38x
Minster In Sheppey 3 57.92x
Canterbury Holy Cross 2 666.67x
Gillingham 2 31.01x
Grouville 2 263.16x
Islington London 2 2.25x
Littlehampton 2 162.60x
Willesden 2 23.15x
Camberwell 1 1.71x
Paddington London 1 2.97x
St Andrewthe Less 1 15.08x
St George Bloomsbury 1 19.01x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Erith surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 5
Annie 4
Sarah 4
Agnes 3
Emily 3
Grace 3
Alice 2
Elizabeth 2
Emma 2
Fanny 2
Gertrude 2
Ann 1
Catherine 1
Charlotte 1
Edith 1
Eliza 1
Estill 1
Ethel 1
Harriet 1
Isabella 1
Jane 1
Kate 1
L.Maud 1
Laura 1
Mabel 1
Martha 1
Matilda 1
Susan 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Erith surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 8
Henry 6
Charles 5
George 4
John 4
Arthur 3
Harry 2
Alfred 1
Cha.R. 1
Edward 1
Edwin 1
Francis 1
Frank 1
Herbert 1
Iredine 1
J.Arthur 1
James 1
Percy 1
Robert 1

Top occupations

Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in Erith households.

FAQ

Erith surname: questions and answers

How common was the Erith surname in 1881?

In 1881, 92 people were recorded with the Erith surname. That placed it at #20,709 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Erith surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 86 in 2016. That gives Erith a modern rank of #32,570.

What does the Erith map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Erith bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.