NameCensus.

UK surname

File

A surname denoting someone who made files for smoothing surfaces.

In the 1881 census there were 227 people recorded with the File surname, ranking it #11,858 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 158, ranked #22,904, down from #11,858 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to London parishes, Paddington and Barham. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Preston, Tonbridge and Malling and Thanet.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for File is 296 in 1901. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 30.4%.

1881 census count

227

Ranked #11,858

Modern count

158

2016, ranked #22,904

Peak year

1901

296 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • File had 227 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #11,858 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 158 in 2016, ranked #22,904.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 296 in 1901.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Rural Amenity.

File surname distribution map

The map shows where the File surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

File surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

File over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 145 #13,223
1861 historical 243 #10,116
1881 historical 227 #11,858
1891 historical 284 #11,542
1901 historical 296 #11,749
1911 historical 283 #11,883
1997 modern 179 #18,889
1998 modern 176 #19,584
1999 modern 168 #20,312
2000 modern 163 #20,657
2001 modern 160 #20,616
2002 modern 165 #20,619
2003 modern 153 #21,406
2004 modern 152 #21,628
2005 modern 147 #22,057
2006 modern 148 #22,111
2007 modern 147 #22,510
2008 modern 149 #22,530
2009 modern 144 #23,577
2010 modern 145 #24,031
2011 modern 143 #24,056
2012 modern 147 #23,567
2013 modern 155 #23,108
2014 modern 151 #23,745
2015 modern 151 #23,613
2016 modern 158 #22,904

Geography

Back to top

Where Files are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around London parishes, Paddington, Barham and Hythe St Leonard, Cheriton, Newington, Saltwood, West Hythe, Burmarsh. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Preston, Tonbridge and Malling, Thanet, Wycombe and Canterbury. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 London parishes London 1
2 Paddington London (West Districts)
3 London parishes London 3
4 Barham Kent
5 Hythe St Leonard, Cheriton, Newington, Saltwood, West Hythe, Burmarsh Kent

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Preston 001 Preston
2 Tonbridge and Malling 001 Tonbridge and Malling
3 Thanet 011 Thanet
4 Wycombe 016 Wycombe
5 Canterbury 011 Canterbury

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with File

These lists show first names that appear often with the File surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for File

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For File, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Rural Amenity

Nationally, the File surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Rural Amenity, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every File household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group comprises older parents or retirees, with no resident dependent children, and with the lowest residential densities in this Supergroup. Predominantly UK-born, residents typically live in detached houses, although others do live in semi-detached and terraced properties. The level of multiple car ownership is the highest in this Supergroup. Most houses are owner occupied although social renting is also present. Many concentrations occur in high amenity rural locations, such as Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

The Greater London Mix

Group

Skilled Trades and Construction Workers

Within London, File is most associated with areas classed as Skilled Trades and Construction Workers, part of The Greater London Mix. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These scattered, peripheral and often low residential density neighbourhoods house more workers in skilled trades and construction. Few households rent social housing and there are few students. Multiple car ownership is higher than the Supergroup average, perhaps because of poorer public transport connectivity. Incidence of mixed or multiple ethnicity is below the Supergroup average, and the absence of individuals identifying as Pakistani or Other Asian groups is also less pronounced. Flatted accommodation is less dominant than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

A Supergroup embodying London's diversity in many respects, apart from low numbers of residents identifying as of Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani or Other (non-Chinese) Asian ethnicity. There is lower than average prevalence of families with dependent children, while there are above average occurrences of never-married individuals and single-person households. The age distribution is skewed towards younger, single residents and couples without children, with many individuals identifying as of mixed or multiple ethnicity. Social rented or private rented housing is slightly more prevalent than average, and many residents live in flats. Individuals typically work in professional and associated roles in public administration, education or health rather than in elementary occupations in agriculture, energy, water, construction or manufacturing. Incidence of students is slightly below average. Individuals declaring no religion are more prevalent than average and non-use of English at home is below average.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

File is most concentrated in decile 5 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

5
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

File falls in decile 6 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

6
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for File is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 25-30 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

5
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with File, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

Meaning and origin of File

The surname File is of English origin and is thought to have derived from the Old English word 'filiæ', meaning a small child or offspring. It is believed to have originated as a descriptive nickname for a young person or the youngest child in a family.

The earliest known record of the name File dates back to the 12th century in the Domesday Book of 1086, where it is listed as 'Filius' in the county of Sussex. This Latin form of the name likely referred to a young man or son.

By the 13th century, the name had evolved into its more modern spelling of 'File' and appeared in various records across England, such as the Hundred Rolls of 1273, which recorded a William File in the county of Oxfordshire.

One of the earliest notable bearers of the name was John File, a merchant and Member of Parliament for the town of Ludlow in Shropshire, who lived around the mid-15th century.

The File surname also has associations with various place names in England, including File Green in Staffordshire and File Farm in Wiltshire, both of which likely derived their names from early inhabitants with the surname.

Other notable historical figures with the surname File include:

1. Thomas File (c. 1550-1625), an English politician and MP for Berkshire. 2. Robert File (c. 1565-1637), an English clergyman and chaplain to King James I. 3. John File (c. 1620-1689), a prominent Quaker minister and writer from Hertfordshire. 4. Sarah File (c. 1680-1720), an early American settler and one of the first English women to establish a home in present-day Delaware. 5. William File (c. 1710-1788), a British naval officer and explorer who commanded expeditions to the Pacific Ocean.

Over the centuries, the File surname has spread across various parts of the English-speaking world, carried by descendants of these early bearers of the name.

Sourced from namecensus.com.

1881 census detail

Back to top

File families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the File surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Kent leads with 184 Files recorded in 1881 and an index of 24.14x.

County Total Index
Kent 184 24.14x
Middlesex 18 0.81x
Cheshire 9 1.83x
Lancashire 8 0.30x
Surrey 4 0.37x
Channel Islands 2 3.02x
Essex 1 0.23x
Hertfordshire 1 0.65x
Sussex 1 0.27x
Yorkshire 1 0.05x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Elham in Kent leads with 50 Files recorded in 1881 and an index of 5494.51x.

Place Total Index
Elham 50 5494.51x
Dymchurch 10 2380.95x
Farnborough 10 900.90x
Hythe St Leonard 10 371.75x
Macclesfield 9 41.06x
Paddington London 8 9.74x
Staple 8 2000.00x
Stelling 8 3636.36x
Stowting 8 5000.00x
Upper Hardres 8 3636.36x
Lympne 7 1627.91x
Bishopsbourne 6 2222.22x
Lyminge 6 923.08x
St Pancras London 5 2.78x
Sutton 5 4545.45x
Boughton Under Blean 4 312.50x
Elmsted 4 1212.12x
Folkestone 4 27.06x
Sellinge 4 800.00x
Windle 4 26.83x
Acton 3 22.92x
Barham 3 384.62x
Dover St Mary Virgin 3 40.65x
East Peckham 3 189.87x
Lydd 3 184.05x
Middleton In Oldham 3 37.74x
Minster In Sheppey 3 23.75x
Dover St James 2 59.88x
Faversham 2 27.51x
Hurst 2 10000.00x
St Helier 2 9.28x
Waltham 2 512.82x
Abbots Langley 1 43.67x
Bexley 1 14.84x
Broughton In Salford 1 4.13x
Buckland In Dover 1 39.53x
Cheriton 1 32.15x
Chichester St Andrew 1 256.41x
Croydon 1 1.66x
Great Dunmow 1 43.48x
Hackney London 1 0.80x
Islington London 1 0.46x
Lambeth 1 0.51x
Lower Hardres 1 454.55x
Newington In Elham 1 232.56x
Postling 1 909.09x
Richmond 1 6.56x
Sculcoates 1 2.85x
Smarden 1 114.94x
Warehorne 1 243.90x
Wimbledon 1 8.18x
Wrotham 1 39.68x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the File surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the File surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 12
Stephen 10
Thomas 10
William 10
George 8
Charles 7
Elgar 4
Frederick 4
Alfred 3
Edwin 3
Fredk. 3
James 3
Joseph 3
Ernest 2
Richard 2
Thos. 2
Arthur 1
Edgar 1
Edmund 1
Edward 1
Frank 1
Geo. 1
Ham 1
Henry 1
Legh 1
Leo 1
Norman 1
Norris 1
Percival 1
Ralph 1
Richd. 1
Rowland 1
Sampson 1
Wiliam 1

FAQ

File surname: questions and answers

How common was the File surname in 1881?

In 1881, 227 people were recorded with the File surname. That placed it at #11,858 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the File surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 158 in 2016. That gives File a modern rank of #22,904.

What does the File surname mean?

A surname denoting someone who made files for smoothing surfaces.

What does the File map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of File bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.