NameCensus.

UK surname

Files

An occupational surname referring to a maker or seller of files, a tool for abrading or smoothing surfaces.

In the 1881 census there were 230 people recorded with the Files surname, ranking it #11,748 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 123, ranked #27,115, down from #11,748 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Dover St James, Dover St Mary, Prescot and Northbourne. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Oban South, Salford and Oban North.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Files is 249 in 1861. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 46.5%.

1881 census count

230

Ranked #11,748

Modern count

123

2016, ranked #27,115

Peak year

1861

249 bearers

Map years

8

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Files had 230 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #11,748 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 123 in 2016, ranked #27,115.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 249 in 1861.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Legacy and Demographically Mixed Communities.

Files surname distribution map

The map shows where the Files surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Files surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Files over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 173 #11,629
1861 historical 249 #9,904
1881 historical 230 #11,748
1891 historical 242 #13,048
1901 historical 116 #20,933
1911 historical 171 #16,461
1997 modern 127 #23,352
1998 modern 132 #23,394
1999 modern 128 #24,017
2000 modern 126 #24,220
2001 modern 121 #24,493
2002 modern 117 #25,494
2003 modern 107 #26,617
2004 modern 110 #26,451
2005 modern 103 #27,531
2006 modern 98 #28,621
2007 modern 98 #29,019
2008 modern 95 #29,822
2009 modern 101 #29,445
2010 modern 103 #29,780
2011 modern 101 #29,938
2012 modern 106 #29,187
2013 modern 118 #27,686
2014 modern 124 #27,049
2015 modern 123 #27,088
2016 modern 123 #27,115

Geography

Back to top

Where Files' are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Dover St James, Dover St Mary, Prescot, Northbourne, Leigh and Ormskirk. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Oban South, Salford, Oban North, Loch Awe and Crathes and Torphins. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Dover St James, Dover St Mary Kent
2 Prescot Lancashire
3 Northbourne Kent
4 Leigh Lancashire
5 Ormskirk Lancashire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Oban South Argyll and Bute
2 Salford 030 Salford
3 Oban North Argyll and Bute
4 Loch Awe Argyll and Bute
5 Crathes and Torphins Aberdeenshire

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Files

These lists show first names that appear often with the Files surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Files

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Files, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Legacy Communities

Group

Legacy and Demographically Mixed Communities

Nationally, the Files surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Legacy and Demographically Mixed Communities, within Legacy Communities. This does not mean every Files household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Households in these areas often include divorced or separated parents and commonly include children and young adults. The age structure is heavily skewed towards the most advanced age groups. Individuals identifying as members of ethnic minorities are not present in large numbers. Flats predominate, with some terraced, semi-detached, and detached units. Multiple car ownership is low, and housing is predominantly in the private and social rented sectors. Employment is less skewed towards traditional routine industrial occupations. Levels of educational attainment are generally low. The Group occurs principally in the Central Lowlands of Scotland and other Scottish towns.

Wider pattern

These neighbourhoods characteristically comprise pockets of flats that are scattered across the UK, particularly in towns that retain or have legacies of heavy industry or are in more remote seaside locations. Employed residents of these neighbourhoods work mainly in low-skilled occupations. Residents typically have limited educational qualifications. Unemployment is above average. Some residents live in overcrowded housing within the social rented sector and experience long-term disability. All adult age groups are represented, although there is an overall age bias towards elderly people in general and the very old in particular. Individuals identifying as belonging to ethnic minorities or Mixed or Multiple ethnic groups are uncommon.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Young Families and Mainstream Employment

Group

Social Rented Sector and Diverse Origins

Within London, Files is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector and Diverse Origins, part of Young Families and Mainstream Employment. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Scattered across London’s Inner and Outer suburbs, residents of these neighbourhoods are typically housed in the social rented sector. Although terraced and semi-detached houses predominate, more residents live in flats than elsewhere in the Supergroup. Neighbourhoods are more ethnically diverse than the Supergroup average. Those identifying as of Bangladeshi, Pakistani and some Black ethnicities are more prevalent. Europeans born in a overseas non-EU countries make up more of the lower proportion of residents identifying as White. Few residents are very old (85+). Employment in distribution, hotels and restaurants is more common than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

Many families in these neighbourhoods have young children. Housing is principally in the social rented sector, in terraced or semi-detached units. While over-all residential densities are low, overcrowding is also prevalent locally. Residents are drawn from a range of ethnic minorities, with many identifying as Black and above average numbers born in Africa. Numbers identifying as of Chinese, Indian or White ethnicity are below average. Levels of proficiency in English are below average. Levels of separation or divorce and incidence of disability are both above average. Education is typically limited to Level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. Few residents work in professional or managerial occupations but the employment structure is otherwise diverse: it includes skilled trades, caring, leisure and other service occupations, sales and customer service occupations, construction, and work as process, plant, and machine operatives.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Files is most concentrated in decile 7 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

7
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Files falls in decile 7 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

7
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Files is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 25-30 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

5
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Files, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

Meaning and origin of Files

The surname Files originated in England, with its earliest recorded instances dating back to the 13th century. The name is derived from the Old English word "fila," meaning a file or workman. It is likely that the name was initially an occupational surname, given to individuals who worked as file makers or metalworkers.

In medieval times, the Files surname was prevalent in various regions of England, including Yorkshire, Lincolnshire, and Nottinghamshire. One of the earliest recorded instances of the name can be found in the Hundredorum Rolls of 1273, where a person named William le Filer was mentioned.

As time passed, the surname underwent various spelling variations, such as Filer, Filer, Filier, and Fyles. These variations reflect the inconsistencies in spelling and record-keeping during the Middle Ages.

The Files surname has been documented in several historical records and manuscripts throughout the centuries. For instance, in the 14th century, a person named John Fyles was mentioned in the Pipe Rolls of Staffordshire. Additionally, the name appeared in the Subsidy Rolls of Sussex in 1327, where a certain Thomas Filer was listed.

One notable individual who bore the surname Files was Sir John Files, a prominent English merchant and politician who lived during the 16th century (c. 1520-1590). He served as the Lord Mayor of London in 1588 and was a Member of Parliament for the City of London.

Another individual of historical significance was William Files (c. 1565-1634), an English clergyman and scholar who served as the Dean of Ely from 1628 until his death. He was known for his contributions to theological literature and his involvement in the translation of the King James Bible.

The Files surname also found its way into literature. In the 17th century, the English playwright and poet Thomas Middleton (c. 1580-1627) included a character named Master Files in his play "A Mad World, My Masters."

During the 18th century, the Files surname continued to be present in various parts of England. One notable person was Richard Files (c. 1720-1790), a successful merchant and landowner from Gloucestershire.

As the centuries passed, the Files surname spread beyond England and became more widespread. In the 19th century, a prominent American bearing the surname was Joseph Files (1823-1899), a politician and lawyer from Missouri who served as a member of the United States House of Representatives from 1873 to 1883.

Throughout history, the surname Files has been carried by individuals from diverse backgrounds and professions, reflecting its enduring legacy and significance across different regions and time periods.

Sourced from namecensus.com.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Files families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Files surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Lancashire leads with 81 Files' recorded in 1881 and an index of 3.03x.

County Total Index
Lancashire 81 3.03x
Kent 74 9.63x
Middlesex 15 0.67x
Surrey 15 1.37x
Somerset 11 3.03x
Cheshire 6 1.21x
Suffolk 6 2.19x
Staffordshire 5 0.66x
Cumberland 3 1.55x
Durham 3 0.45x
Sussex 3 0.79x
Yorkshire 3 0.13x
Devon 2 0.43x
Cambridgeshire 1 0.70x
Glamorgan 1 0.25x
Hampshire 1 0.22x
Royal Navy 1 3.72x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Deal in Kent leads with 20 Files' recorded in 1881 and an index of 304.88x.

Place Total Index
Deal 20 304.88x
Skelmersdale 13 291.48x
Northbourne 11 1506.85x
Bickerstaffe 9 514.29x
Buckland In Dover 8 313.73x
Streatham 8 47.85x
Westleigh 8 131.80x
Coldred 7 5833.33x
Limehouse London 7 28.29x
Orrell 7 210.84x
Bermondsey 6 8.94x
Bramford 6 582.52x
Chartham 6 312.50x
Liverpool 6 3.69x
Ormskirk 6 117.19x
Weston 6 215.05x
Whitfield 6 2500.00x
Fishwick 5 303.03x
Parr 5 52.25x
Charlton 4 78.28x
Chorley 4 26.67x
Islington London 4 1.83x
Rainford 4 138.41x
Walcot 4 20.70x
Willenhall 4 28.07x
Farington 3 192.31x
Newton In Ashton Under 3 61.10x
Westoe 3 7.89x
Birkenhead 2 5.04x
Cleator 2 24.78x
Clerkenwell London 2 3.76x
Dover St Mary Virgin 2 26.88x
Eccleston In Prescot 2 14.90x
Ewell Lydden 2 333.33x
Hastings All Sts 2 55.87x
Kearsley 2 35.52x
Skelton In Guisbrough 2 33.11x
Aldershot 1 6.46x
Bedminster 1 2.93x
Birkdale 1 14.77x
Brinnington 1 21.51x
Croydon 1 1.64x
Dover Castle 1 178.57x
Guston 1 322.58x
Harrington 1 42.74x
Kirkdale 1 2.22x
Little Mongeham 1 769.23x
Llantwit Vairdre 1 22.68x
Maidstone 1 4.37x
Margate St John Baptist 1 7.10x
Moss Side 1 7.11x
Norton In Moors 1 24.81x
Notton 1 500.00x
Oldham 1 1.16x
Plymouth Charles The 1 4.84x
Rackenford 1 357.14x
Royal Navy 1 4.36x
Seaford 1 77.52x
St Andrewthe Less 1 6.13x
St George In East London 1 4.72x
St Luke London 1 2.77x
Walmer 1 29.94x
Wavertree 1 11.68x
Westhoughton 1 14.01x
Widnes 1 5.19x
Worth 1 285.71x
Yalding 1 51.55x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Files surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 16
Ann 11
Elizabeth 10
Alice 6
Sarah 6
Eliza 4
Emily 4
Louisa 4
Martha 4
Catherine 3
Ellen 3
Emma 3
Hannah 3
Jane 3
Margaret 3
Susannah 3
Agnes 2
Annie 2
Caroline 2
Minnie 2
Ada 1
Allic 1
Anna 1
Anne 1
Betsy 1
Charlotte 1
Esther 1
Harriet 1
Isabella 1
Kate 1
Margret 1
Margt. 1
Maria 1
Maude 1
Rachael 1
Rachel 1
Rosina 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Files surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 19
John 17
Thomas 12
James 8
George 7
Edward 6
Henry 6
Richard 6
Charles 4
Robert 4
Alfred 3
Stephen 3
Peter 2
Walter 2
Adam 1
Albert 1
Alexander 1
Arthur 1
David 1
E. 1
Edgar 1
Edwin 1
Ernest 1
Erns. 1
Ezekiel 1
F. 1
Frank 1
Frederick 1
Herbert 1
Jno. 1
Joseph 1
Philip 1
Thos. 1
Wm. 1

FAQ

Files surname: questions and answers

How common was the Files surname in 1881?

In 1881, 230 people were recorded with the Files surname. That placed it at #11,748 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Files surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 123 in 2016. That gives Files a modern rank of #27,115.

What does the Files surname mean?

An occupational surname referring to a maker or seller of files, a tool for abrading or smoothing surfaces.

What does the Files map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Files bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.