NameCensus.

UK surname

Fright

In the 1881 census there were 201 people recorded with the Fright surname, ranking it #12,791 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 169, ranked #21,884, down from #12,791 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Minster, St Peter and Margate. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Thanet and Dover.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Fright is 249 in 1911. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 15.9%.

1881 census count

201

Ranked #12,791

Modern count

169

2016, ranked #21,884

Peak year

1911

249 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Fright had 201 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #12,791 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 169 in 2016, ranked #21,884.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 249 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Legacy Industrial and Coastal Communities.

Fright surname distribution map

The map shows where the Fright surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Fright surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Fright over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 153 #12,721
1861 historical 218 #11,175
1881 historical 201 #12,791
1891 historical 241 #13,089
1901 historical 239 #13,489
1911 historical 249 #12,951
1997 modern 199 #17,668
1998 modern 206 #17,796
1999 modern 197 #18,400
2000 modern 194 #18,554
2001 modern 189 #18,590
2002 modern 191 #18,817
2003 modern 183 #19,152
2004 modern 177 #19,662
2005 modern 161 #20,799
2006 modern 160 #21,066
2007 modern 164 #20,973
2008 modern 164 #21,137
2009 modern 168 #21,290
2010 modern 180 #20,812
2011 modern 175 #21,035
2012 modern 187 #20,086
2013 modern 182 #20,795
2014 modern 181 #21,033
2015 modern 174 #21,449
2016 modern 169 #21,884

Geography

Back to top

Where Frights are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Minster, St Peter, Margate, Birchington and St Lawrence in Thanet. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Thanet and Dover. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Minster Kent
2 St Peter Kent
3 Margate Kent
4 Birchington Kent
5 St Lawrence in Thanet Kent

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Thanet 006 Thanet
2 Thanet 015 Thanet
3 Dover 001 Dover
4 Dover 002 Dover
5 Thanet 013 Thanet

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Fright

These lists show first names that appear often with the Fright surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Fright

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Fright, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Baseline UK

Group

Legacy Industrial and Coastal Communities

Nationally, the Fright surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Legacy Industrial and Coastal Communities, within Baseline UK. This does not mean every Fright household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Single-person households are common in these neighbourhoods, and these residents are typically divorced rather than never married. A high proportion of residents were born outside the UK in the EU. There are many young adults, some with young children, but relatively few residents are of normal retirement age or over. Although levels of identification with ethnic minorities are in line with the Supergroup average, individuals identifying with Mixed or Multiple ethnicities is more common than average. High long-term disability rates are observed, and unpaid care is more common than in the rest of the Group. The predominant housing types are terraced houses and flats, which are typically part of the social rented sector. This Group is commonly found in coastal areas and (present-day or former) industrial towns and cities.

Wider pattern

This Supergroup exemplifies the broad base to the UK’s social structure, encompassing as it does the average or modal levels of many neighbourhood characteristics, including all housing tenures, a range of levels of educational attainment and religious affiliations, and a variety of pre-retirement age structures. Yet, in combination, these mixes are each distinctive of the parts of the UK. Overall, terraced houses and flats are the most prevalent, as is employment in intermediate or low-skilled occupations. However, this Supergroup is also characterised by above average levels of unemployment and lower levels of use of English as the main language. Many neighbourhoods occur in south London and the UK’s other major urban centres.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs

Group

London Fringe

Within London, Fright is most associated with areas classed as London Fringe, part of Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Predominantly located in neighbourhoods on the outskirts of Greater London, residents of these neighbourhoods typically have their highest qualifications below degree (Level 4) level, with those still in work engaged in skilled trades and occupations in distribution, hotels and restaurants. There is low ethnic diversity in these neighbourhoods and high levels of Christian religious affiliation. Detached or terraced houses predominate, often with spare rooms.

Wider London pattern

The age distribution of these neighbourhoods is skewed towards the middle-aged and old, although few residents live alone or in communal establishments and numbers of dependent children are around average. Owner occupation is the norm, as is residence in detached or semi-detached houses. Residential densities are low and many households have spare rooms. Most residents were born in the UK and, aside from some identifying as members of Chinese or Indian ethnicities, identify as White. Mixed ethnicity households are rare. Incidence of married couples is higher than average and few individuals have never been married. A large proportion of individuals still in employment work in administrative and secretarial occupations, or in the construction industry. Few residents are students, and many households own more than one car.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Fright is most concentrated in decile 8 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

8
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Fright falls in decile 5 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

5
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Fright is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Fright, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Fright families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Fright surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Kent leads with 155 Frights recorded in 1881 and an index of 23.17x.

County Total Index
Kent 155 23.17x
Lancashire 15 0.64x
Middlesex 14 0.71x
Surrey 13 1.36x
Cheshire 1 0.23x
Essex 1 0.26x
Sussex 1 0.30x
Warwickshire 1 0.20x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Margate St John Baptist in Kent leads with 38 Frights recorded in 1881 and an index of 310.20x.

Place Total Index
Margate St John Baptist 38 310.20x
Minster In Thanet 30 2158.27x
Gillingham 14 101.52x
St Peters 11 355.99x
Canterbury St Dunstan 8 695.65x
Shoreditch London 8 9.41x
St Lawrence 8 173.91x
Faversham 6 94.04x
Heap 6 48.62x
Battersea 5 6.93x
Penge 5 39.94x
Ramsgate 5 45.79x
Stretford 5 39.06x
Birchington 4 425.53x
Chelsfield 4 625.00x
Islington London 4 2.10x
Petham 4 869.57x
Buckland In Dover 3 135.14x
Eastling 3 937.50x
Minster In Sheppey 3 27.08x
Mitcham 3 49.67x
Chorlton On Medlock 2 5.41x
Folkestone 2 15.41x
Lee 2 20.60x
Monkton 2 800.00x
Newington In Elham 2 526.32x
Tonge 2 40.98x
Birmingham 1 0.61x
Boreham 1 149.25x
Chartham 1 59.88x
Chatham 1 5.43x
Cheadle 1 12.09x
Milton In Milton 1 35.21x
Newhaven 1 37.17x
Plumstead 1 4.48x
St Pancras London 1 0.63x
Tonbridge 1 4.14x
Tottenham 1 3.20x
Wychling 1 1000.00x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Fright surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 14
Jane 8
Ellen 7
Emma 6
Sarah 6
Harriett 5
Elizabeth 4
Annie 3
Eliza 3
Alice 2
Ann 2
Elizth. 2
Emily 2
Eva 2
Fanny 2
Hannah 2
Maria 2
Minnie 2
Rebeca 2
Rebecca 2
Rose 2
Amelia 1
Amy 1
Bertha 1
Bissie 1
Caroline 1
Catherine 1
Charlotte 1
Clara 1
Dora 1
Edith 1
Elizebeth 1
Esther 1
Isabel 1
Jessie 1
Lillian 1
Louisa 1
Mabel 1
Phoebe 1
Sophia 1
Vera 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Fright surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 13
William 11
George 8
James 7
Charles 6
Richard 6
Edward 5
Alfred 4
Walter 4
Stephen 3
Albert 2
Arthur 2
David 2
Frederick 2
Gilbert 2
Harry 2
Herbert 2
Robert 2
Thomas 2
Athel 1
Atwill 1
Benjamin 1
Edgar 1
Edmund 1
Ellis 1
Ernest 1
Fred 1
Fredk. 1
Henry 1
Joseph 1
Lewis 1
Martin 1
Mile 1
Moses 1
Ned 1

FAQ

Fright surname: questions and answers

How common was the Fright surname in 1881?

In 1881, 201 people were recorded with the Fright surname. That placed it at #12,791 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Fright surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 169 in 2016. That gives Fright a modern rank of #21,884.

What does the Fright map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Fright bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.