NameCensus.

UK surname

Fullalove

In the 1881 census there were 170 people recorded with the Fullalove surname, ranking it #14,265 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 288, ranked #15,180, down from #14,265 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Ystradyfodwg (incl. Rhigos), Lincoln St Botolph and Manchester. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Ribble Valley, Hyndburn and Caerphilly.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Fullalove is 314 in 2011. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 69.4%.

1881 census count

170

Ranked #14,265

Modern count

288

2016, ranked #15,180

Peak year

2011

314 bearers

Map years

8

1861 to 2016

Key insights

  • Fullalove had 170 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #14,265 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 288 in 2016, ranked #15,180.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 267 in 1901.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Inner Suburbs and Small Town Living.

Fullalove surname distribution map

The map shows where the Fullalove surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Fullalove surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Fullalove over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 85 #18,940
1861 historical 102 #20,797
1881 historical 170 #14,265
1891 historical 185 #15,803
1901 historical 267 #12,587
1911 historical 241 #13,229
1997 modern 265 #14,692
1998 modern 277 #14,646
1999 modern 282 #14,545
2000 modern 294 #14,105
2001 modern 293 #13,933
2002 modern 296 #14,110
2003 modern 294 #14,002
2004 modern 294 #14,055
2005 modern 279 #14,480
2006 modern 272 #14,834
2007 modern 269 #15,123
2008 modern 267 #15,349
2009 modern 283 #15,020
2010 modern 304 #14,591
2011 modern 314 #14,165
2012 modern 294 #14,705
2013 modern 290 #15,107
2014 modern 290 #15,203
2015 modern 296 #14,893
2016 modern 288 #15,180

Geography

Back to top

Where Fullaloves are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Ystradyfodwg (incl. Rhigos), Lincoln St Botolph, Manchester, Preston and Scopwick. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Ribble Valley, Hyndburn, Caerphilly, Preston and Wiltshire. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Ystradyfodwg (incl. Rhigos) Glamorganshire
2 Lincoln St Botolph Lincolnshire
3 Manchester Lancashire
4 Preston Lancashire
5 Scopwick Lincolnshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Ribble Valley 001 Ribble Valley
2 Hyndburn 002 Hyndburn
3 Caerphilly 022 Caerphilly
4 Preston 013 Preston
5 Wiltshire 018 Wiltshire

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Fullalove

These lists show first names that appear often with the Fullalove surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Fullalove

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Fullalove, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Inner Suburbs and Small Town Living

Nationally, the Fullalove surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Inner Suburbs and Small Town Living, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Fullalove household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Families with resident dependent children (but not students) are common. Established family groups and White ethnicity predominate, as do individuals born in the UK. They are more likely than the Supergroup average to have been resident in their terraced, semi-detached, or detached houses for more than one year. Levels of multiple car ownership are high. Properties are owned and typically have surplus living space. Associate professionals and administrative occupations are prevalent, and parents are likely to be in middle age or approaching retirement. Educational attainment is above the Supergroup average. Scattered developments and concentrations are found in many small towns.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Social Rented Sector Families with Children

Group

Social Rented Sector Pockets

Within London, Fullalove is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector Pockets, part of Social Rented Sector Families with Children. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Found in pockets across London, residents are less likely to live in private sector rentals and fewer adults are students. Fewer individuals work in transport and communications occupations relative to the Supergroup average. More individuals identify as Black and were born in Africa.

Wider London pattern

Residents of these neighbourhoods include sizable numbers identifying with ethnicities originating outside Europe, particularly in Africa or Bangladesh. The proportion of residents identifying as White, Indian or Pakistani is well below the London average. Neighbourhood age profiles are skewed towards younger adults, and above average numbers of families have children. Rates of use of English at home are below average. Marriage rates are low, and levels of separation or divorce are above average. Housing is predominantly in flats, and renting in the social rented sector the norm - few residents are owner occupiers. Housing is often overcrowded, and neighbourhoods are amongst the most densely populated in London. Disability rates are above average, although levels of unpaid care provision are about average. Employment is in caring, leisure, other service occupations, sales and customer service, or process, plant, and machine operation. Part time working and full-time student study are common. Levels of unemployment are slightly above average. Most residents have only Level 1 or 2 educational qualifications or have completed apprenticeships.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Fullalove is most concentrated in decile 9 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

9
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Fullalove falls in decile 1 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

1
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Fullalove is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 25-30 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

5
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Fullalove, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Fullalove families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Fullalove surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Lancashire leads with 83 Fullaloves recorded in 1881 and an index of 4.24x.

County Total Index
Lancashire 83 4.24x
Lincolnshire 27 10.24x
Middlesex 16 0.97x
Yorkshire 11 0.67x
Glamorgan 7 2.44x
Derbyshire 5 1.94x
Surrey 5 0.62x
Cheshire 4 1.10x
Devon 4 1.17x
Essex 3 0.92x
Rutland 2 16.53x
Staffordshire 2 0.36x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Oldham in Lancashire leads with 16 Fullaloves recorded in 1881 and an index of 25.34x.

Place Total Index
Oldham 16 25.34x
Preston 12 22.93x
St Maryle Wigford 11 536.59x
Ardwick 9 51.02x
Blackburn 9 17.29x
Leeds 9 9.76x
Chadderton 8 83.68x
Salford 8 13.91x
Aighton Bailey 7 744.68x
Eglwysilan 7 140.56x
St Botolph Lincoln 7 370.37x
Scopwick 6 2608.70x
Long Eaton 5 146.63x
Lower Booths 4 114.29x
Malden 4 1904.76x
Newchurch 4 25.00x
Sale 4 89.69x
St Anne Soho London 4 42.51x
Ealing 3 20.37x
Hammersmith London 3 7.39x
Islington London 3 1.88x
Stoke Damerel 3 12.49x
West Ham 3 4.18x
Manchester 2 2.27x
Ruskington 2 298.51x
Uppingham 2 138.89x
Walton Le Dale 2 38.02x
Bardney 1 126.58x
Devonport 1 25.38x
Headingley Cum Burley 1 9.51x
Liverpool 1 0.84x
Maer 1 454.55x
Rotherhithe 1 4.91x
Samlesbury 1 232.56x
Scarborough 1 6.74x
St George Hanover Square 1 3.44x
St Giles In Fields London 1 12.36x
St Marylebone London 1 1.14x
Tamworth 1 33.56x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Fullalove surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Fullalove surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 16
William 11
Joseph 6
James 5
George 4
Robert 3
Stephen 3
Thomas 3
Alfred 2
Bernard 2
Ernest 2
Frank 2
Harry 2
Aaron 1
Arthur 1
David 1
Fred 1
Frederick 1
Fredk. 1
Goulding 1
Henry 1
Herbert 1
Jonathon 1
Martin 1
Radford 1
Richard 1
Samuel 1
Thos. 1
Tom 1

FAQ

Fullalove surname: questions and answers

How common was the Fullalove surname in 1881?

In 1881, 170 people were recorded with the Fullalove surname. That placed it at #14,265 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Fullalove surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 288 in 2016. That gives Fullalove a modern rank of #15,180.

What does the Fullalove map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Fullalove bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.