NameCensus.

UK surname

Funge

In the 1881 census there were 137 people recorded with the Funge surname, ranking it #16,358 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 112, ranked #28,844, down from #16,358 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Greenwich, London parishes and Tring. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Central Bedfordshire, Birmingham and Powys.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Funge is 171 in 1891. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 18.2%.

1881 census count

137

Ranked #16,358

Modern count

112

2016, ranked #28,844

Peak year

1891

171 bearers

Map years

8

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Funge had 137 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #16,358 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 112 in 2016, ranked #28,844.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 171 in 1891.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Established Mature Families.

Funge surname distribution map

The map shows where the Funge surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Funge surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Funge over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 108 #16,308
1861 historical 98 #21,388
1881 historical 137 #16,358
1891 historical 171 #16,733
1901 historical 155 #17,704
1911 historical 161 #17,072
1997 modern 128 #23,238
1998 modern 130 #23,603
1999 modern 136 #23,186
2000 modern 127 #24,121
2001 modern 124 #24,114
2002 modern 134 #23,492
2003 modern 138 #22,823
2004 modern 125 #24,443
2005 modern 122 #24,817
2006 modern 119 #25,413
2007 modern 121 #25,469
2008 modern 116 #26,510
2009 modern 114 #27,363
2010 modern 117 #27,557
2011 modern 124 #26,367
2012 modern 118 #27,250
2013 modern 120 #27,406
2014 modern 122 #27,358
2015 modern 124 #26,944
2016 modern 112 #28,844

Geography

Back to top

Where Funges are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Greenwich, London parishes, Tring, St John Hackney and St Paul Deptford, St Nicholas Deptford. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Central Bedfordshire, Birmingham, Powys, Telford and Wrekin and Cheshire East. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Greenwich London (South Districts)
2 London parishes London 3
3 Tring Hertfordshire
4 St John Hackney London (North Districts)
5 St Paul Deptford, St Nicholas Deptford London (South Districts)

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Central Bedfordshire 021 Central Bedfordshire
2 Birmingham 006 Birmingham
3 Powys 009 Powys
4 Telford and Wrekin 022 Telford and Wrekin
5 Cheshire East 022 Cheshire East

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Funge

These lists show first names that appear often with the Funge surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Funge

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Funge, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Retired Professionals

Group

Established Mature Families

Nationally, the Funge surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Established Mature Families, within Retired Professionals. This does not mean every Funge household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Married couples predominate, many with older dependent children. Detached housing is common. Homeownership rates are the highest within this Supergroup. The presence of some students suggests that households are towards the end of a child rearing phase. Many residents have degree level qualifications, and the occupational profile is heavily skewed towards managerial and professional occupations. Residential developments commonly occur on the periphery of major urban cities or conurbations.

Wider pattern

Typically married but no longer with resident dependent children, these well-educated households either remain working in their managerial, professional, administrative or other skilled occupations, or are retired from them – the modal individual age is beyond normal retirement age. Underoccupied detached and semi-detached properties predominate, and unpaid care is more prevalent than reported disability. The prevalence of this Supergroup outside most urban conurbations indicates that rural lifestyles prevail, typically sustained by using two or more cars per household.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Professional Employment and Family Lifecycles

Group

Established Homeowners with Children

Within London, Funge is most associated with areas classed as Established Homeowners with Children, part of Professional Employment and Family Lifecycles. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These predominantly British-born residents are typically married/in civil partnerships and own the properties in which they are raising their children. Parents are typically over 45, and many other residents are beyond normal retirement age. Detached and semi-detached houses predominate and multiple car ownership is common.

Wider London pattern

These neighbourhoods house people of all ages, predominantly of White British or European extraction. Resident turnover is low. Religious affiliation is less common than average and tends to be Christian if expressed. Homeownership, typically of terraced houses, is common but use of the social rented sector is not. Employment is typically in professional, managerial and associate professional or technical occupations. There are few full-time students. Level 4 qualifications are common. More households lack dependent children than have them which, considered alongside low levels of crowding and over-all age structure, indicates that many households may be post child-rearing and in late middle age. Incidence of disability is low, as is residence in communal establishments.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Funge is most concentrated in decile 1 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the less healthy end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

1
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Funge falls in decile 9 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the less deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

9
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Funge is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 50-60 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

8
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Funge, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Funge families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Funge surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Kent leads with 41 Funges recorded in 1881 and an index of 8.99x.

County Total Index
Kent 41 8.99x
Middlesex 31 2.32x
Buckinghamshire 13 16.09x
Hertfordshire 10 10.86x
Bedfordshire 7 10.12x
Cambridgeshire 7 8.27x
Gloucestershire 5 1.91x
Staffordshire 5 1.11x
Sussex 5 2.22x
Northamptonshire 4 3.18x
Oxfordshire 4 4.85x
Berkshire 1 1.00x
Devon 1 0.36x
Lincolnshire 1 0.47x
Surrey 1 0.15x
Warwickshire 1 0.30x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Greenwich in Kent leads with 24 Funges recorded in 1881 and an index of 112.84x.

Place Total Index
Greenwich 24 112.84x
Tring 10 406.50x
Dunstable 7 328.64x
Chelsea London 6 14.90x
Hackney London 6 8.01x
Milton In Gravesend 6 87.72x
St George In East London 6 47.73x
Buckland 5 1250.00x
Cheadle 5 230.41x
Pebworth 5 1562.50x
St Andrewthe Less 5 51.71x
Fenny Stratford 4 526.32x
Islington London 4 3.09x
Lewisham 4 16.45x
Pembury 4 615.38x
Holton 3 2727.27x
Wadhurst 3 202.70x
Deptford St Paul 2 5.69x
Ealing 2 16.75x
Isleworth 2 33.67x
Lamberhurstsussex 2 689.66x
Marsworth 2 952.38x
St George Hanover Square 2 8.50x
The Holy Sepulchre 2 952.38x
Towcester 2 153.85x
Abingdon St Helen 1 34.13x
Brixham 1 31.06x
Chiswick 1 13.70x
Cold Higham 1 625.00x
Dinton 1 312.50x
Edlesborough 1 135.14x
Great Grimsby 1 7.37x
Kingsey 1 909.09x
Leatherhead 1 61.35x
Maidstone 1 7.36x
Mile End Old Town London 1 3.52x
Northampton Priory St 1 13.26x
Paddington London 1 2.04x
Polesworth 1 62.50x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Funge surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Funge surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 8
James 7
William 7
Thomas 6
George 5
Albert 3
Alfred 3
Arthur 2
Edward 2
Frederick 2
Henry 2
Joseph 2
Richard 2
Amos 1
Benjamin 1
Daniel 1
Edmund 1
Esau 1
Fredk. 1
Harry 1
Jesse 1
Job 1
Mufred 1
Robert 1
Willie 1
Willm. 1

FAQ

Funge surname: questions and answers

How common was the Funge surname in 1881?

In 1881, 137 people were recorded with the Funge surname. That placed it at #16,358 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Funge surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 112 in 2016. That gives Funge a modern rank of #28,844.

What does the Funge map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Funge bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.