NameCensus.

UK surname

Ghost

Originally a surname referring to an occupation associated with haunted places or spirits.

In the 1881 census there were 74 people recorded with the Ghost surname, ranking it #23,062 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 68, ranked #33,826, down from #23,062 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Chalfont St Giles, London parishes and St Pancras. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Ghost is 104 in 1911. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 8.1%.

1881 census count

74

Ranked #23,062

Modern count

68

2016, ranked #33,826

Peak year

1911

104 bearers

Map years

1

1911 to 1911

Key insights

  • Ghost had 74 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #23,062 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 68 in 2016, ranked #33,826.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 104 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is No data.

Ghost surname distribution map

The map shows where the Ghost surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Ghost surname density by area, 1911 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Ghost over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 77 #19,998
1861 historical 74 #24,370
1881 historical 74 #23,062
1891 historical 75 #27,414
1901 historical 90 #24,021
1911 historical 104 #22,209
1997 modern 67 #30,915
1998 modern 71 #30,869
1999 modern 67 #31,409
2000 modern 60 #32,124
2001 modern 59 #32,080
2002 modern 58 #32,564
2003 modern 58 #32,619
2004 modern 56 #33,067
2005 modern 57 #33,178
2006 modern 56 #33,587
2007 modern 54 #34,042
2008 modern 59 #33,827
2009 modern 56 #34,278
2010 modern 59 #34,273
2011 modern 59 #34,265
2012 modern 51 #34,756
2013 modern 53 #34,715
2014 modern 59 #34,459
2015 modern 63 #34,178
2016 modern 68 #33,826

Geography

Back to top

Where Ghosts are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Chalfont St Giles, London parishes, St Pancras, Wingfield, North and Tring. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Chalfont St Giles Buckinghamshire
2 London parishes London 3
3 St Pancras London (North Districts)
4 Wingfield, North Derbyshire
5 Tring Hertfordshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 No data No data

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Ghost

These lists show first names that appear often with the Ghost surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Ghost

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Ghost, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Nationally, the Ghost surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Ghost household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Within London, Ghost is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Ghost is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Ghost, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

Meaning and origin of Ghost

The surname "GHOST" is believed to have originated in England during the Middle Ages. It is thought to be derived from the Old English word "gast," which meant "spirit" or "soul." This word may have initially been used as a nickname or descriptive name for someone who seemed ghostly or pale in appearance.

One of the earliest recorded instances of the name can be found in the Domesday Book of 1086, which mentions a man named Godwine Gast in the county of Gloucestershire. This suggests that the name was already in use by the late 11th century, though it may have existed in various spellings and forms even earlier.

During the medieval period, the name was often spelled as "Gast," "Gaste," or "Gost," reflecting the different dialects and linguistic variations of the time. As surnames became more standardized, the spelling eventually settled on "Ghost."

In the 13th century, records show a William Gost living in Nottinghamshire. This may have been a reference to the nearby village of Gosthorpe, which could indicate that the name was also associated with certain place names or locations.

One notable bearer of the surname was John Ghost, a prominent merchant and alderman who lived in London during the late 15th century. He was involved in trade with the Netherlands and is mentioned in various historical documents from that time.

Another significant figure was Sir Richard Ghost (c. 1530-1592), a military commander who served under Queen Elizabeth I during the Anglo-Spanish War. He was knighted for his valor in the Battle of Smerwick in 1580.

In the 17th century, the name appears in the records of the English Civil War, with a Captain Thomas Ghost serving in the Parliamentarian forces. He was involved in the siege of Oxford in 1646.

Moving into the 18th century, we find mention of a Samuel Ghost (1685-1753), a prominent clergyman and author who wrote several works on theology and religious philosophy.

Finally, in the 19th century, there was Sir Henry Ghost (1817-1891), a British explorer and diplomat who spent much of his career in Central Asia and served as the British Envoy to Persia (modern-day Iran) from 1869 to 1873.

While these are just a few examples, the surname "GHOST" has a rich history spanning several centuries, with bearers of the name making notable contributions in various fields throughout the years.

Sourced from namecensus.com.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Ghost families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Ghost surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Middlesex leads with 32 Ghosts recorded in 1881 and an index of 4.43x.

County Total Index
Middlesex 32 4.43x
Hertfordshire 25 50.26x
Surrey 8 2.28x
Buckinghamshire 5 11.46x
Sussex 4 3.29x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Bethnal Green London in Middlesex leads with 12 Ghosts recorded in 1881 and an index of 38.28x.

Place Total Index
Bethnal Green London 12 38.28x
Hemel Hempstead 11 491.07x
Tring 9 676.69x
Southwark Christchurch 6 177.51x
Islington London 5 7.15x
Limehouse London 5 63.13x
Seer Green 5 6250.00x
Poplar London 4 29.37x
Berkhampstead 3 267.86x
Brighton 2 8.15x
St Clement Danes London 2 134.23x
Chobham 1 161.29x
Eastbourne 1 17.86x
Edmonton 1 17.21x
Enfield 1 21.14x
Hackney London 1 2.47x
Hastings St Leonards 1 55.87x
Kensington London 1 2.49x
Little Gaddesden 1 1111.11x
Newington 1 3.75x
Northchurch 1 188.68x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Ghost surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 5
Elizabeth 3
Emma 3
Jane 3
Alice 2
Edith 2
Eliza 2
Ellen 2
Elmore 2
Maria 2
Sarah 2
Adelaide 1
Ann 1
Anne 1
Annie 1
Augusta 1
Beatrice 1
Cecilia 1
Emily 1
Emima 1
Esther 1
Florence 1
Isabella 1
Jemmina 1
Rachael 1
Sophia 1
Thirza 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Ghost surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 5
Henry 4
Charles 2
George 2
Jesse 2
John 2
Thomas 2
Albert 1
Benjamin 1
Bernhard 1
Edward 1
Ernest 1
Frederick 1
James 1
Richard 1
Robert 1
Samuel 1

FAQ

Ghost surname: questions and answers

How common was the Ghost surname in 1881?

In 1881, 74 people were recorded with the Ghost surname. That placed it at #23,062 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Ghost surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 68 in 2016. That gives Ghost a modern rank of #33,826.

What does the Ghost surname mean?

Originally a surname referring to an occupation associated with haunted places or spirits.

What does the Ghost map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Ghost bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.