NameCensus.

UK surname

Glister

In the 1881 census there were 82 people recorded with the Glister surname, ranking it #21,957 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 219, ranked #18,422, up from #21,957 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Calthorpe, Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside and Aylsham. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include County Durham, Bradford and South Bucks.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Glister is 243 in 1998. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 167.1%.

1881 census count

82

Ranked #21,957

Modern count

219

2016, ranked #18,422

Peak year

1998

243 bearers

Map years

6

1891 to 2016

Key insights

  • Glister had 82 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #21,957 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 219 in 2016, ranked #18,422.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 142 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Rural Amenity.

Glister surname distribution map

The map shows where the Glister surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Glister surname density by area, 2016 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Glister over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 27 #28,467
1861 historical 61 #26,170
1881 historical 82 #21,957
1891 historical 106 #23,105
1901 historical 125 #20,061
1911 historical 142 #18,487
1997 modern 240 #15,678
1998 modern 243 #15,993
1999 modern 243 #16,094
2000 modern 237 #16,331
2001 modern 231 #16,365
2002 modern 242 #16,186
2003 modern 241 #16,013
2004 modern 237 #16,283
2005 modern 232 #16,480
2006 modern 230 #16,690
2007 modern 231 #16,835
2008 modern 231 #16,973
2009 modern 237 #17,052
2010 modern 240 #17,230
2011 modern 239 #17,138
2012 modern 217 #18,184
2013 modern 220 #18,324
2014 modern 225 #18,142
2015 modern 223 #18,165
2016 modern 219 #18,422

Geography

Back to top

Where Glisters are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Calthorpe, Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside, Aylsham, Gimingham and Newcastle St John. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to County Durham, Bradford and South Bucks. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Calthorpe Norfolk
2 Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside Durham
3 Aylsham Norfolk
4 Gimingham Norfolk
5 Newcastle St John Northumberland

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 County Durham 008 County Durham
2 County Durham 009 County Durham
3 County Durham 006 County Durham
4 Bradford 052 Bradford
5 South Bucks 007 South Bucks

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Glister

These lists show first names that appear often with the Glister surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Glister

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Glister, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Rural Amenity

Nationally, the Glister surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Rural Amenity, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Glister household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group comprises older parents or retirees, with no resident dependent children, and with the lowest residential densities in this Supergroup. Predominantly UK-born, residents typically live in detached houses, although others do live in semi-detached and terraced properties. The level of multiple car ownership is the highest in this Supergroup. Most houses are owner occupied although social renting is also present. Many concentrations occur in high amenity rural locations, such as Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Young Families and Mainstream Employment

Group

Terraced and Semi-Detached Suburbs

Within London, Glister is most associated with areas classed as Terraced and Semi-Detached Suburbs, part of Young Families and Mainstream Employment. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Mainly concentrated in suburban areas, these terraced and semi-detached developments are less overcrowded than the Supergroup average, and resident households are more likely to own two or more cars. There are fewer residents aged 25-44, and a larger share of residents employed in administrative and secretarial occupations. Residents are more likely to have been born in the UK, less likely to have been born in the EU or Africa, and much less likely to self-identify as Bangladeshi.

Wider London pattern

Many families in these neighbourhoods have young children. Housing is principally in the social rented sector, in terraced or semi-detached units. While over-all residential densities are low, overcrowding is also prevalent locally. Residents are drawn from a range of ethnic minorities, with many identifying as Black and above average numbers born in Africa. Numbers identifying as of Chinese, Indian or White ethnicity are below average. Levels of proficiency in English are below average. Levels of separation or divorce and incidence of disability are both above average. Education is typically limited to Level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. Few residents work in professional or managerial occupations but the employment structure is otherwise diverse: it includes skilled trades, caring, leisure and other service occupations, sales and customer service occupations, construction, and work as process, plant, and machine operatives.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Glister is most concentrated in decile 5 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

5
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Glister falls in decile 5 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

5
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Glister is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Glister, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Glister families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Glister surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Norfolk leads with 42 Glisters recorded in 1881 and an index of 34.15x.

County Total Index
Norfolk 42 34.15x
Durham 18 7.56x
Yorkshire 11 1.39x
Lancashire 5 0.53x
Essex 2 1.27x
Middlesex 2 0.25x
Pembrokeshire 1 3.93x
Suffolk 1 1.03x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Calthorpe in Norfolk leads with 24 Glisters recorded in 1881 and an index of 40000.00x.

Place Total Index
Calthorpe 24 40000.00x
Collierley 9 849.06x
Beverley St Martin 8 606.06x
Esh 6 346.82x
Manchester 5 11.72x
Matlask 5 12500.00x
Cornsay 3 468.75x
Corpusty 3 3000.00x
Gimingham 3 3750.00x
Aylsham 2 273.97x
Chelmsford 2 73.80x
Limehouse London 2 22.78x
Linthorpe 2 42.28x
Thetford St Cuthbert 2 454.55x
Alby 1 1428.57x
Colby 1 1428.57x
Ixworth 1 370.37x
Middlesbrough 1 9.69x
Pembroke St Mary 1 30.58x
Southrepps 1 416.67x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Glister surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Elizabeth 7
Eliza 2
Jane 2
Sarah 2
Adah 1
Alice 1
Ann 1
Anna 1
Anne 1
Annie 1
Barbara 1
Caroline 1
Catherine 1
Charlotte 1
Dinah 1
Dorothy 1
Edith 1
Eleanor 1
Elisabeth 1
Eliz. 1
Elizth. 1
Ellen 1
Emma 1
Gertrude 1
Hannah 1
Hapsobeth 1
Harriet 1
Isabella 1
Liba 1
Margery 1
Maria 1
Mary 1
Pemelia 1
Susan 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Glister surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 8
George 7
Robert 3
Thomas 3
William 3
James 2
Joseph 2
Walter 2
Albert 1
Benjamin 1
Charles 1
Frank 1
Fredrick 1
Herbert 1
Mary 1
Samuel 1
Willm. 1

Top occupations

Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in Glister households.

FAQ

Glister surname: questions and answers

How common was the Glister surname in 1881?

In 1881, 82 people were recorded with the Glister surname. That placed it at #21,957 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Glister surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 219 in 2016. That gives Glister a modern rank of #18,422.

What does the Glister map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Glister bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.