NameCensus.

UK surname

Hazard

An occupational surname referring to a person who played games of chance or worked in a dangerous profession.

In the 1881 census there were 517 people recorded with the Hazard surname, ranking it #6,593 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 583, ranked #8,899, down from #6,593 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Sunderland, Lenton, Radford, Papplewick, Nuthall, Greasley, Brewhouse Yard and London parishes. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Newark and Sherwood, Sunderland and Torfaen.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Hazard is 596 in 1911. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 12.8%.

1881 census count

517

Ranked #6,593

Modern count

583

2016, ranked #8,899

Peak year

1911

596 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Hazard had 517 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #6,593 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 583 in 2016, ranked #8,899.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 596 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Small Town Suburbia.

Hazard surname distribution map

The map shows where the Hazard surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Hazard surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Hazard over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 494 #5,061
1861 historical 322 #7,911
1881 historical 517 #6,593
1891 historical 424 #8,446
1901 historical 507 #7,969
1911 historical 596 #6,875
1997 modern 531 #8,900
1998 modern 566 #8,726
1999 modern 555 #8,919
2000 modern 537 #9,118
2001 modern 534 #9,000
2002 modern 558 #8,876
2003 modern 556 #8,770
2004 modern 560 #8,754
2005 modern 545 #8,842
2006 modern 542 #8,918
2007 modern 539 #9,025
2008 modern 560 #8,835
2009 modern 581 #8,793
2010 modern 592 #8,874
2011 modern 575 #8,967
2012 modern 542 #9,279
2013 modern 569 #9,066
2014 modern 581 #9,006
2015 modern 582 #8,931
2016 modern 583 #8,899

Geography

Back to top

Where Hazards are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Sunderland, Lenton, Radford, Papplewick, Nuthall, Greasley, Brewhouse Yard, London parishes, Nottingham St Mary and Bishop Wearmouth. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Newark and Sherwood, Sunderland and Torfaen. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Sunderland Durham
2 Lenton, Radford, Papplewick, Nuthall, Greasley, Brewhouse Yard Nottinghamshire
3 London parishes London 3
4 Nottingham St Mary Nottinghamshire
5 Bishop Wearmouth Durham

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Newark and Sherwood 007 Newark and Sherwood
2 Sunderland 023 Sunderland
3 Sunderland 016 Sunderland
4 Newark and Sherwood 005 Newark and Sherwood
5 Torfaen 006 Torfaen

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Hazard

These lists show first names that appear often with the Hazard surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Hazard

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Hazard, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Retired Professionals

Group

Small Town Suburbia

Nationally, the Hazard surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Small Town Suburbia, within Retired Professionals. This does not mean every Hazard household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group is predominantly comprised of married couples with no resident dependent children, living in areas characterised neither by under-occupancy nor overcrowding throughout the UK in or adjacent to small towns. White ethnic groups and affiliation with Christianity predominates. Housing tends to be predominantly semi-detached or detached and workers are employed principally in managerial and professional occupations, with semi-skilled occupations also in evidence. These areas of the Supergroup are of higher population density.

Wider pattern

Typically married but no longer with resident dependent children, these well-educated households either remain working in their managerial, professional, administrative or other skilled occupations, or are retired from them – the modal individual age is beyond normal retirement age. Underoccupied detached and semi-detached properties predominate, and unpaid care is more prevalent than reported disability. The prevalence of this Supergroup outside most urban conurbations indicates that rural lifestyles prevail, typically sustained by using two or more cars per household.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Central Connected Professionals and Managers

Group

Senior Professionals

Within London, Hazard is most associated with areas classed as Senior Professionals, part of Central Connected Professionals and Managers. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These very central neighbourhoods house residents whose ages are more skewed towards older age cohorts than elsewhere in the Supergroup. Few households have young children. Rates of illness are low. Indian ethnicity is rare compared to the Supergroup mean. Property under occupation is more common, despite the centrality of neighbourhoods, and more residents live in communal establishments than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

Adult residents of these neighbourhoods are typically aged 25 to 44, working full-time in professional, managerial or associate professional occupations. There are few families with dependent children. The predominantly Inner London neighbourhoods have an international character, including many residents born elsewhere in Europe alongside high numbers of individuals identifying as of Chinese ethnicity. Many individuals are never married, childless and/or living alone. Above average numbers of individuals, likely to be full-time students, live in communal establishments. Elsewhere, privately rented flats are the dominant housing type. Residents of these areas are well-qualified, with a significant number holding Level 4 or above qualifications. There is a correspondingly high level of individuals employed full-time in professional, managerial and associated professional or technical occupations. Employing industries are financial, real estate, professional, administration, and, to a lesser degree, transport and communications. Unemployment is uncommon.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Hazard is most concentrated in decile 7 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

7
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Hazard falls in decile 1 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

1
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Hazard is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of Over 70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

10
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Hazard, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

Meaning and origin of Hazard

The surname HAZARD originated in France during the late 12th century. It is derived from the Old French word "hasard," meaning "chance" or "risk." The name likely originated as a descriptive surname, referring to someone who took risks or lived a hazardous lifestyle.

One of the earliest recorded instances of the HAZARD surname can be found in the Pipe Rolls of Lincolnshire, England, from 1202, where a Robert Hasard is mentioned. In the 13th century, the surname appeared in various spellings, such as Hazart, Hasard, and Hassard, in records across Normandy and England.

The HAZARD surname has a long history in England, with notable individuals carrying the name. In the 14th century, Sir Robert Hazard served as a member of parliament for Northampton in 1376. During the 15th century, William Hazard was a prominent landowner in Norfolk, England.

In the 16th century, the HAZARD surname became more widespread across England and the American colonies. One of the earliest recorded instances in the colonies is Thomas Hazard, who settled in Rhode Island in 1635 and is considered the ancestor of many Hazard families in the United States.

Notable individuals with the HAZARD surname include:

1. Geoffrey Hazard (1737-1820), an English politician and member of parliament for Norfolk. 2. Ebenezer Hazard (1744-1817), an American publisher and historian, known for his work on the historical collections of Pennsylvania. 3. Caroline Hazard (1856-1945), an American educator and philanthropist, who founded the Hazard Memorial School in Rhode Island. 4. Paul Hazard (1878-1944), a French literary critic and historian, recognized for his work on the history of ideas and the Enlightenment. 5. Solly Hazard (1901-1967), an American baseball player who played for the Boston Red Sox and the New York Yankees in the 1920s.

The HAZARD surname has a rich history spanning several centuries and can be traced back to its French origins. It has been carried by notable individuals in various fields, including politics, literature, education, and sports, across different parts of the world.

Sourced from namecensus.com.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Hazard families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Hazard surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Nottinghamshire leads with 101 Hazards recorded in 1881 and an index of 14.89x.

County Total Index
Nottinghamshire 101 14.89x
Middlesex 77 1.53x
Durham 50 3.34x
Hampshire 30 2.91x
Surrey 28 1.14x
Somerset 27 3.33x
Yorkshire 27 0.54x
Lancashire 21 0.35x
Lincolnshire 20 2.49x
Wiltshire 20 4.49x
Gloucestershire 17 1.72x
Berkshire 12 3.18x
Dorset 12 3.63x
Lanarkshire 10 0.61x
Cheshire 9 0.81x
Derbyshire 9 1.14x
Kent 9 0.52x
Glamorgan 8 0.91x
Renfrewshire 7 1.79x
Worcestershire 5 0.76x
Devon 4 0.38x
Essex 2 0.20x
Hertfordshire 2 0.58x
Monmouthshire 2 0.55x
Norfolk 2 0.26x
Bedfordshire 1 0.38x
Buckinghamshire 1 0.33x
Cambridgeshire 1 0.31x
Cumberland 1 0.23x
Staffordshire 1 0.06x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Bishopwearmouth in Durham leads with 28 Hazards recorded in 1881 and an index of 21.78x.

Place Total Index
Bishopwearmouth 28 21.78x
Nottingham St Mary 23 13.11x
Radford 19 55.12x
Burcombe 15 2777.78x
Sandhurst 12 163.93x
Sunderland 12 45.37x
Clerkenwell London 11 9.26x
Bristol St Philip Jacob 10 10.76x
Chew Magna 10 352.11x
Lambeth 10 2.28x
Snenton 10 37.51x
Chelsea London 9 5.93x
Laneham 9 1698.11x
Heighington 8 620.16x
Holbeck 8 24.21x
Hulme 8 6.42x
Newington 8 4.30x
Old Monkland 8 12.38x
Roath 8 20.10x
Ryde 8 36.10x
Sheffield 8 5.04x
Brimington 7 117.06x
Eastwood 7 29.14x
Limehouse London 7 12.67x
Mansfield 7 29.81x
Sherborne 7 71.94x
South Charford 7 4666.67x
Hammersmith London 6 4.84x
Lower Bebington 6 90.91x
St George Hanover Square 6 6.77x
St Marylebone London 6 2.23x
Teddington London 6 52.63x
Blackburn 5 3.15x
Hedworth Monkton Jarrow 5 7.71x
Horsington 5 387.60x
Kneesall 5 1020.41x
Normanton On Trent 5 909.09x
Norwell 5 704.23x
Ruddington 5 109.89x
Sedgebrook 5 1315.79x
Southwark St George Martyr 5 4.94x
Southwick 5 35.26x
St Swithin Lincoln 5 39.53x
Charmouth 4 370.37x
Kensington London 4 1.43x
Mile End New Town London 4 40.20x
Southampton All Sts 4 22.60x
St Luke London 4 4.95x
Worcester St Peter 4 32.15x
Charlton Next Woolwich 3 16.75x
Dartmouth Townstall 3 70.26x
Hallam 3 600.00x
Liverpool 3 0.83x
Northwood 3 20.42x
Penistone 3 77.12x
Sevenoaks 3 21.55x
St Pancras London 3 0.74x
Stapleton 3 16.02x
Walcot 3 6.95x
Willesden 3 6.32x
Abergavenny 2 14.67x
Bedminster 2 2.63x
Bethnal Green London 2 0.91x
Clifton 2 4.01x
Elmdon 2 188.68x
Govan 2 0.50x
Greenwich 2 2.50x
Hackney London 2 0.71x
Huddersfield 2 2.75x
Monken Hadley 2 99.50x
Norton 2 30.82x
Norwell Woodhouse 2 1333.33x
Pemberton 2 8.40x
Preston 2 1.25x
Redenhall 2 66.45x
Ropley 2 132.45x
South Stoneham 2 8.94x
Stoke Trister 2 273.97x
Streatham 2 5.35x
Whippingham 2 25.61x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Hazard surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Elizabeth 33
Mary 33
Sarah 18
Annie 10
Emma 10
Harriet 10
Ada 9
Jane 9
Eliza 8
Ann 7
Edith 7
Ellen 7
Louisa 6
Fanny 5
Anne 4
Frances 4
Harriett 4
Kate 4
Alice 3
Hannah 3
Laura 3
Lydia 3
Amy 2
Betsy 2
Charlotte 2
Clara 2
Claricy 2
Dorothy 2
Emily 2
Georgina 2
Jemima 2
Lucy 2
Marguerite 2
Maria 2
Martha 2
Minnie 2
Sophia 2
Ursula 2
Violet 2
Winifred 2
Caket 1
Caroline 1
Catherine 1
Elisan 1
Elizabet 1
Ellan 1
Elsie 1
Jessie 1
June 1
Justina 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Hazard surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 28
William 21
Charles 19
James 18
Thomas 18
George 13
Henry 13
Robert 12
Walter 10
Arthur 7
Richard 7
Albert 4
Edward 4
Harry 4
Joseph 4
Ernest 3
Herbert 3
David 2
Edgar 2
Frank 2
Samuel 2
A. 1
Alexander 1
Alfred 1
Blandford 1
Chas.James 1
Christoper 1
Christopher 1
Clement 1
Cyrus 1
Daniel 1
Edwin 1
Fred 1
Henery 1
Jas. 1
Jason 1
Joshua 1
Lancelot 1
Lasco 1
Lewis 1
Reginald 1
Sidney 1
Stephen 1
Sydney 1
Theodore 1

FAQ

Hazard surname: questions and answers

How common was the Hazard surname in 1881?

In 1881, 517 people were recorded with the Hazard surname. That placed it at #6,593 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Hazard surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 583 in 2016. That gives Hazard a modern rank of #8,899.

What does the Hazard surname mean?

An occupational surname referring to a person who played games of chance or worked in a dangerous profession.

What does the Hazard map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Hazard bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.