UK surname
In the 1881 census there were 11 people recorded with the Hugher surname, ranking it #32,081 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 3, ranked #38,594, down from #32,081 in 1881.
The strongest historical links point to Ystradyfodwg (incl. Rhigos), London parishes and Toxteth Park. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.
Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Hugher is 361 in 1851. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 72.7%.
1881 census count
11
Ranked #32,081
Modern count
3
2016, ranked #38,594
Peak year
1851
361 bearers
Map years
2
1851 to 1891
Key insights
Map
Back to topThe map shows where the Hugher surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.
Distribution map
Hugher surname density by area, 1891 census.
Timeline
Back to topThe table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.
| Year | Period | Count | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1851 | historical | 361 | #6,554 |
| 1861 | historical | 29 | #30,287 |
| 1881 | historical | 11 | #32,081 |
| 1891 | historical | 233 | #13,392 |
| 1901 | historical | 19 | #31,911 |
| 1911 | historical | 83 | #24,531 |
| 1997 | modern | 10 | #37,060 |
| 1998 | modern | 10 | #37,048 |
| 1999 | modern | 8 | #37,367 |
| 2000 | modern | 6 | #37,624 |
| 2001 | modern | 2 | #38,335 |
| 2002 | modern | 2 | #38,400 |
| 2003 | modern | 4 | #37,951 |
| 2004 | modern | 4 | #38,013 |
| 2005 | modern | 6 | #37,724 |
| 2006 | modern | 6 | #37,788 |
| 2007 | modern | 7 | #37,687 |
| 2008 | modern | 6 | #37,883 |
| 2009 | modern | 7 | #37,816 |
| 2010 | modern | 5 | #38,186 |
| 2011 | modern | 5 | #38,168 |
| 2012 | modern | 3 | #38,530 |
| 2013 | modern | 3 | #38,526 |
| 2014 | modern | 3 | #38,552 |
| 2015 | modern | 3 | #38,558 |
| 2016 | modern | 3 | #38,594 |
Geography
Back to topHistorical parish links are strongest around Ystradyfodwg (incl. Rhigos), London parishes, Toxteth Park, St Pancras and Manchester. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.
The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.
| Rank | Parish | Area |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ystradyfodwg (incl. Rhigos) | Glamorganshire |
| 2 | London parishes | London 3 |
| 3 | Toxteth Park | Lancashire |
| 4 | St Pancras | London (North Districts) |
| 5 | Manchester | Lancashire |
| Rank | Area | District |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | No data | No data |
Forenames
Back to topThese lists show first names that appear often with the Hugher surname in historical and recent records.
Recent female names
Recent male names
Modern profile
Back to topModern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Hugher, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.
These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.
The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.
UK neighbourhood type
Supergroup
No data
Group
No data
Nationally, the Hugher surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Hugher household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.
London neighbourhood type
Supergroup
No data
Group
No data
Within London, Hugher is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.
Broadband speed
The modern neighbourhood pattern for Hugher is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.
Area snapshot
This describes the area pattern most associated with Hugher, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.
1881 census detail
Back to topThese tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Hugher surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.
Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Denbighshire leads with 4 Hughers recorded in 1881 and an index of 98.77x.
| County | Total | Index |
|---|---|---|
| Denbighshire | 4 | 98.77x |
| Glamorgan | 2 | 10.71x |
| Berkshire | 1 | 12.42x |
| Derbyshire | 1 | 5.96x |
| Durham | 1 | 3.13x |
| Essex | 1 | 4.73x |
| Middlesex | 1 | 0.93x |
Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Broughton in Denbighshire leads with 4 Hughers recorded in 1881 and an index of 2500.00x.
| Place | Total | Index |
|---|---|---|
| Broughton | 4 | 2500.00x |
| Cilybebill | 2 | 2857.14x |
| Darlington | 1 | 81.30x |
| Mickleover | 1 | 2000.00x |
| Mile End Old Town London | 1 | 43.86x |
| Reading St Giles | 1 | 126.58x |
| South Shoebury | 1 | 1250.00x |
These are the female first names most often recorded with the Hugher surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.
FAQ
In 1881, 11 people were recorded with the Hugher surname. That placed it at #32,081 in the surname rankings for that year.
The latest modern count shown here is 3 in 2016. That gives Hugher a modern rank of #38,594.
The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Hugher bearers relative to the surrounding population.
The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.