NameCensus.

UK surname

Hurlstone

In the 1881 census there were 158 people recorded with the Hurlstone surname, ranking it #14,989 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 214, ranked #18,740, down from #14,989 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Coker, West, Melbury Osmond and St Pancras. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Pendle, St Edmundsbury and Sandwell.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Hurlstone is 238 in 2005. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 35.4%.

1881 census count

158

Ranked #14,989

Modern count

214

2016, ranked #18,740

Peak year

2005

238 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Hurlstone had 158 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #14,989 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 214 in 2016, ranked #18,740.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 185 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Rural Amenity.

Hurlstone surname distribution map

The map shows where the Hurlstone surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Hurlstone surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Hurlstone over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 167 #11,936
1861 historical 154 #14,963
1881 historical 158 #14,989
1891 historical 175 #16,467
1901 historical 177 #16,342
1911 historical 185 #15,686
1997 modern 186 #18,448
1998 modern 215 #17,306
1999 modern 226 #16,884
2000 modern 227 #16,792
2001 modern 223 #16,765
2002 modern 229 #16,771
2003 modern 208 #17,685
2004 modern 220 #17,129
2005 modern 238 #16,198
2006 modern 224 #16,990
2007 modern 215 #17,633
2008 modern 209 #18,114
2009 modern 211 #18,377
2010 modern 221 #18,205
2011 modern 234 #17,383
2012 modern 220 #18,034
2013 modern 213 #18,743
2014 modern 216 #18,705
2015 modern 215 #18,659
2016 modern 214 #18,740

Geography

Back to top

Where Hurlstones are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Coker, West, Melbury Osmond, St Pancras, Stoke-on-Trent, Bucknell-cum-Bagnall, Caverswall and London parishes. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Pendle, St Edmundsbury, Sandwell and Shropshire. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Coker, West Somerset
2 Melbury Osmond Dorset
3 St Pancras London (North Districts)
4 Stoke-on-Trent, Bucknell-cum-Bagnall, Caverswall Staffordshire
5 London parishes London 2

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Pendle 004 Pendle
2 Pendle 006 Pendle
3 St Edmundsbury 011 St Edmundsbury
4 Sandwell 039 Sandwell
5 Shropshire 025 Shropshire

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Hurlstone

These lists show first names that appear often with the Hurlstone surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Hurlstone

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Hurlstone, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Rural Amenity

Nationally, the Hurlstone surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Rural Amenity, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Hurlstone household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group comprises older parents or retirees, with no resident dependent children, and with the lowest residential densities in this Supergroup. Predominantly UK-born, residents typically live in detached houses, although others do live in semi-detached and terraced properties. The level of multiple car ownership is the highest in this Supergroup. Most houses are owner occupied although social renting is also present. Many concentrations occur in high amenity rural locations, such as Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs

Group

Professional Periphery

Within London, Hurlstone is most associated with areas classed as Professional Periphery, part of Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These neighbourhoods predominantly house residents aged 45+, with many aged 85+. Most employed residents work in senior roles, and relatively few work in unskilled jobs. Terraced housing is comparatively rare, but communal living is more common. More residents identify as of Indian ethnicity and more affiliate with non-Christian religions. Disability levels are below the Supergroup average.

Wider London pattern

The age distribution of these neighbourhoods is skewed towards the middle-aged and old, although few residents live alone or in communal establishments and numbers of dependent children are around average. Owner occupation is the norm, as is residence in detached or semi-detached houses. Residential densities are low and many households have spare rooms. Most residents were born in the UK and, aside from some identifying as members of Chinese or Indian ethnicities, identify as White. Mixed ethnicity households are rare. Incidence of married couples is higher than average and few individuals have never been married. A large proportion of individuals still in employment work in administrative and secretarial occupations, or in the construction industry. Few residents are students, and many households own more than one car.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Hurlstone is most concentrated in decile 2 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the less healthy end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

2
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Hurlstone falls in decile 8 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the less deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

8
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Hurlstone is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 50-60 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

8
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Hurlstone, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Hurlstone families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Hurlstone surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Staffordshire leads with 32 Hurlstones recorded in 1881 and an index of 6.15x.

County Total Index
Staffordshire 32 6.15x
Middlesex 20 1.30x
Dorset 14 13.84x
Shropshire 13 9.76x
Warwickshire 12 3.09x
Gloucestershire 10 3.31x
Somerset 10 4.03x
Surrey 9 1.20x
Worcestershire 8 3.98x
Sussex 7 2.69x
Lancashire 5 0.27x
Hampshire 3 0.95x
Kent 3 0.57x
Yorkshire 3 0.20x
Brecknockshire 2 6.49x
Cheshire 2 0.59x
Lincolnshire 2 0.81x
Wiltshire 2 1.47x
Devon 1 0.31x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Stoke Upon Trent in Staffordshire leads with 15 Hurlstones recorded in 1881 and an index of 27.19x.

Place Total Index
Stoke Upon Trent 15 27.19x
St Pancras London 11 8.87x
Dursley 9 725.81x
Oldbury 8 80.81x
Camberwell 7 7.11x
Wyke Regis 7 482.76x
Aston 6 5.61x
Hastings St Mary In The 6 108.30x
Whitchurch 6 232.56x
Edgmond 5 340.14x
Ilminster 4 231.21x
Kingswinford 4 21.18x
Leamington 4 155.04x
Maiden Newton 4 952.38x
Newcastle Under Lyme 4 43.48x
Hackney London 3 3.47x
Hampstead London 3 12.50x
Lee 3 39.32x
Portsea 3 4.85x
St Marylebone London 3 3.65x
Standish With Langtree 3 133.33x
Brecknock St John 2 76.92x
Cheadle 2 30.77x
Corsham 2 100.50x
Frome 2 33.73x
Walsall Borough 2 49.51x
Walsall Foreign 2 7.44x
Warwick St Nicholas 2 70.18x
West Coker 2 400.00x
Alston 1 117.65x
Barden In Skipton 1 476.19x
Baschurch 1 109.89x
Broughton In Salford 1 5.98x
Cerne Abbas 1 204.08x
Charlton Marshall 1 294.12x
Cheltenham 1 4.29x
Compton Bishop 1 344.83x
Ellesmere Penley 1 588.24x
Huddersfield 1 4.49x
Keighley 1 6.14x
Kinver 1 66.67x
Lambeth 1 0.74x
Louth 1 17.70x
Slaugham 1 119.05x
Southwark Christchurch 1 13.85x
St Margaret Lincoln 1 454.55x
Tormoham 1 7.37x
Trentham 1 22.62x
Walcot 1 7.57x
Wednesfield 1 13.05x
Weymouth 1 52.08x
Wolstanton 1 6.33x
Wolverhampton 1 2.50x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Hurlstone surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Hurlstone surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 9
Henry 8
William 8
Thomas 5
Albert 4
Charles 4
George 4
James 4
Joseph 3
Edward 2
Ernest 2
Fredrick 2
Harry 2
Herbert 2
Robert 2
Edmund 1
Edwin 1
Frank 1
Frederick 1
Leonard 1
Martin 1
Michael 1
Percy 1
Samuel 1
Willm.D. 1
Willm.H. 1

FAQ

Hurlstone surname: questions and answers

How common was the Hurlstone surname in 1881?

In 1881, 158 people were recorded with the Hurlstone surname. That placed it at #14,989 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Hurlstone surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 214 in 2016. That gives Hurlstone a modern rank of #18,740.

What does the Hurlstone map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Hurlstone bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.