NameCensus.

UK surname

Leaves

In the 1881 census there were 131 people recorded with the Leaves surname, ranking it #16,824 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 149, ranked #23,844, down from #16,824 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to London parishes, Kirkheaton and Ilminster. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Plymouth, Hart and Havant.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Leaves is 252 in 1861. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 13.7%.

1881 census count

131

Ranked #16,824

Modern count

149

2016, ranked #23,844

Peak year

1861

252 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Leaves had 131 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #16,824 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 149 in 2016, ranked #23,844.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 252 in 1861.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Established Mature Families.

Leaves surname distribution map

The map shows where the Leaves surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Leaves surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Leaves over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 129 #14,406
1861 historical 252 #9,804
1881 historical 131 #16,824
1891 historical 200 #14,913
1901 historical 144 #18,505
1911 historical 185 #15,686
1997 modern 142 #21,856
1998 modern 152 #21,481
1999 modern 155 #21,375
2000 modern 145 #22,259
2001 modern 141 #22,344
2002 modern 142 #22,687
2003 modern 146 #22,069
2004 modern 149 #21,905
2005 modern 139 #22,887
2006 modern 141 #22,833
2007 modern 139 #23,377
2008 modern 138 #23,763
2009 modern 144 #23,577
2010 modern 149 #23,598
2011 modern 149 #23,408
2012 modern 147 #23,567
2013 modern 155 #23,108
2014 modern 159 #22,930
2015 modern 143 #24,481
2016 modern 149 #23,844

Geography

Back to top

Where Leaves' are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around London parishes, Kirkheaton, Ilminster and Bedwelty. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Plymouth, Hart, Havant and Caerphilly. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 London parishes London 1
2 London parishes London 3
3 Kirkheaton Yorkshire, West Riding
4 Ilminster Somerset
5 Bedwelty Monmouthshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Plymouth 012 Plymouth
2 Plymouth 026 Plymouth
3 Hart 002 Hart
4 Havant 020 Havant
5 Caerphilly 024 Caerphilly

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Leaves

These lists show first names that appear often with the Leaves surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Leaves

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Leaves, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Retired Professionals

Group

Established Mature Families

Nationally, the Leaves surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Established Mature Families, within Retired Professionals. This does not mean every Leaves household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Married couples predominate, many with older dependent children. Detached housing is common. Homeownership rates are the highest within this Supergroup. The presence of some students suggests that households are towards the end of a child rearing phase. Many residents have degree level qualifications, and the occupational profile is heavily skewed towards managerial and professional occupations. Residential developments commonly occur on the periphery of major urban cities or conurbations.

Wider pattern

Typically married but no longer with resident dependent children, these well-educated households either remain working in their managerial, professional, administrative or other skilled occupations, or are retired from them – the modal individual age is beyond normal retirement age. Underoccupied detached and semi-detached properties predominate, and unpaid care is more prevalent than reported disability. The prevalence of this Supergroup outside most urban conurbations indicates that rural lifestyles prevail, typically sustained by using two or more cars per household.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

The Greater London Mix

Group

Social Rented Sector Professional Support Workers

Within London, Leaves is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector Professional Support Workers, part of The Greater London Mix. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Mainly located in Inner London, these neighbourhoods retain a diverse employment structure, with some concentration in associated professional and technical occupations rather than skilled trades or construction. Social renting is more common and levels of homeownership are low. Many residents identify as Black. There is a lower than average rate of marriage or civil partnership, few that are very old (85 or over) and higher than average incidence of disability.

Wider London pattern

A Supergroup embodying London's diversity in many respects, apart from low numbers of residents identifying as of Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani or Other (non-Chinese) Asian ethnicity. There is lower than average prevalence of families with dependent children, while there are above average occurrences of never-married individuals and single-person households. The age distribution is skewed towards younger, single residents and couples without children, with many individuals identifying as of mixed or multiple ethnicity. Social rented or private rented housing is slightly more prevalent than average, and many residents live in flats. Individuals typically work in professional and associated roles in public administration, education or health rather than in elementary occupations in agriculture, energy, water, construction or manufacturing. Incidence of students is slightly below average. Individuals declaring no religion are more prevalent than average and non-use of English at home is below average.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Leaves is most concentrated in decile 9 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

9
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Leaves falls in decile 10 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the less deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

10
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Leaves is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of Over 70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

10
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Leaves, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Leaves families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Leaves surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Somerset leads with 36 Leaves' recorded in 1881 and an index of 17.50x.

County Total Index
Somerset 36 17.50x
Middlesex 17 1.33x
Hampshire 14 5.35x
Dorset 13 15.50x
Surrey 11 1.77x
Sussex 10 4.64x
Glamorgan 8 3.60x
Kent 7 1.61x
Yorkshire 6 0.47x
Worcestershire 3 1.80x
Essex 2 0.79x
Buckinghamshire 1 1.29x
Devon 1 0.38x
Durham 1 0.26x
Nottinghamshire 1 0.58x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Kingstone in Somerset leads with 21 Leaves' recorded in 1881 and an index of 21000.00x.

Place Total Index
Kingstone 21 21000.00x
Thorncombe 9 1875.00x
Cogan 8 2424.24x
Droxford 8 800.00x
Ilminster 8 555.56x
Lambeth 7 6.28x
Chillington 6 6000.00x
Kirkheaton 5 243.90x
Bethnal Green London 4 7.21x
Kensington London 4 5.63x
Willesden 4 33.20x
Burwash 3 300.00x
Kings Norton 3 20.05x
Tonbridge 3 19.08x
Bishops Waltham 2 183.49x
Croydon 2 5.79x
Hastings All Sts 2 98.52x
Mayfield 2 157.48x
Netherbury 2 289.86x
Paddington London 2 4.26x
Portsea 2 3.90x
Basingstoke 1 33.22x
Brighton 1 2.30x
Chardstock 1 172.41x
Chelsfield 1 238.10x
Chesham 1 35.09x
Christchurch 1 17.61x
Cudworth 1 1666.67x
Darlington 1 6.81x
Dorchester St Peter 1 163.93x
East Hoathly 1 270.27x
Horton Kirby 1 149.25x
Kingston On Thames 1 6.68x
Langfield 1 45.05x
Musbury 1 434.78x
Nottingham St Mary 1 2.24x
Snodland 1 80.65x
Southwark St George Martyr 1 3.89x
St Andrew Holborn London 1 18.08x
St George Hanover Square 1 4.44x
Towerof London London 1 243.90x
Uckfield 1 106.38x
Waldershare 1 1666.67x
West Ham 1 1.80x
Woodford 1 34.97x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Leaves surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Sarah 8
Jane 5
Mary 5
Charlotte 3
Elizabeth 3
Ellen 3
Martha 3
Adelaide 2
Amelia 2
Ann 2
Emily 2
Emma 2
Esther 2
Florence 2
Marion 2
Ruth 2
Anne 1
Annie 1
Christiana 1
Clara 1
Edith 1
Hannah 1
Harriett 1
Helena 1
Heneretta 1
Henrietta 1
Jemima 1
Jnet 1
Kate 1
Louisa 1
Nurse 1
Pamelia 1
Phoebe 1
Rose 1
Rosetta 1
Sophia 1
Susan 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Leaves surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 7
John 6
Richard 5
Henry 4
George 3
Thomas 3
Albert 2
Charles 2
Edward 2
James 2
Joe 2
Robert 2
Alfred 1
Arthur 1
Cyrus 1
Ebenezer 1
Edwd. 1
Edwin 1
Ernest 1
Frank 1
Frederick 1
Homer 1
Joel 1
Joseph 1
Morgan 1
Philip 1
Phillip 1
Saml.Herbert 1
Wm. 1
Wm.Henry 1
Zechariah 1
Zonas 1

FAQ

Leaves surname: questions and answers

How common was the Leaves surname in 1881?

In 1881, 131 people were recorded with the Leaves surname. That placed it at #16,824 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Leaves surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 149 in 2016. That gives Leaves a modern rank of #23,844.

What does the Leaves map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Leaves bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.