NameCensus.

UK surname

Lowers

A surname referring to someone who lived near or worked in a lowland area.

In the 1881 census there were 53 people recorded with the Lowers surname, ranking it #26,134 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 90, ranked #32,202, down from #26,134 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to London parishes, Eccles and Manchester. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Harlow, Rother and Bromley.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Lowers is 285 in 1891. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 69.8%.

1881 census count

53

Ranked #26,134

Modern count

90

2016, ranked #32,202

Peak year

1891

285 bearers

Map years

5

1861 to 1998

Key insights

  • Lowers had 53 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #26,134 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 90 in 2016, ranked #32,202.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 285 in 1891.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Challenged Communities.

Lowers surname distribution map

The map shows where the Lowers surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Lowers surname density by area, 1998 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Lowers over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 55 #23,413
1861 historical 158 #14,644
1881 historical 53 #26,134
1891 historical 285 #11,515
1901 historical 105 #22,179
1911 historical 191 #15,392
1997 modern 97 #27,342
1998 modern 103 #27,141
1999 modern 95 #28,465
2000 modern 95 #28,441
2001 modern 95 #28,101
2002 modern 105 #27,123
2003 modern 105 #26,940
2004 modern 97 #28,455
2005 modern 90 #29,527
2006 modern 94 #29,264
2007 modern 94 #29,650
2008 modern 100 #29,001
2009 modern 101 #29,445
2010 modern 101 #30,078
2011 modern 97 #30,552
2012 modern 92 #31,528
2013 modern 95 #31,523
2014 modern 96 #31,667
2015 modern 92 #32,075
2016 modern 90 #32,202

Geography

Back to top

Where Lowers' are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around London parishes, Eccles, Manchester, Preston and Dalton-in-Furness. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Harlow, Rother and Bromley. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 London parishes London 3
2 Eccles Lancashire
3 Manchester Lancashire
4 Preston Lancashire
5 Dalton-in-Furness Lancashire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Harlow 009 Harlow
2 Rother 010 Rother
3 Harlow 004 Harlow
4 Bromley 014 Bromley
5 Rother 009 Rother

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Lowers

These lists show first names that appear often with the Lowers surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Lowers

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Lowers, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Baseline UK

Group

Challenged Communities

Nationally, the Lowers surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Challenged Communities, within Baseline UK. This does not mean every Lowers household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Residents of these neighbourhoods typically live in households with dependent children, and there are fewer-than-average residents of normal retirement age or over. Identification with ethnic minorities, particularly Black, or Mixed or Multiple ethnicities is common. The rate of Christian religious affiliation is low. Housing predominantly consists of semi-detached houses, along with a significant number of terraced properties and flats. Overcrowded social housing is common, and private renting occurs at average UK levels. Those in employment work mainly in caring leisure and other services; process, plant and machine operation; or elementary occupations. Unemployment is high, and few individuals have degree level qualifications. Many of these neighbourhoods occur in commuter towns or less accessible areas of larger towns and cities.

Wider pattern

This Supergroup exemplifies the broad base to the UK’s social structure, encompassing as it does the average or modal levels of many neighbourhood characteristics, including all housing tenures, a range of levels of educational attainment and religious affiliations, and a variety of pre-retirement age structures. Yet, in combination, these mixes are each distinctive of the parts of the UK. Overall, terraced houses and flats are the most prevalent, as is employment in intermediate or low-skilled occupations. However, this Supergroup is also characterised by above average levels of unemployment and lower levels of use of English as the main language. Many neighbourhoods occur in south London and the UK’s other major urban centres.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Young Families and Mainstream Employment

Group

Terraced and Semi-Detached Suburbs

Within London, Lowers is most associated with areas classed as Terraced and Semi-Detached Suburbs, part of Young Families and Mainstream Employment. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Mainly concentrated in suburban areas, these terraced and semi-detached developments are less overcrowded than the Supergroup average, and resident households are more likely to own two or more cars. There are fewer residents aged 25-44, and a larger share of residents employed in administrative and secretarial occupations. Residents are more likely to have been born in the UK, less likely to have been born in the EU or Africa, and much less likely to self-identify as Bangladeshi.

Wider London pattern

Many families in these neighbourhoods have young children. Housing is principally in the social rented sector, in terraced or semi-detached units. While over-all residential densities are low, overcrowding is also prevalent locally. Residents are drawn from a range of ethnic minorities, with many identifying as Black and above average numbers born in Africa. Numbers identifying as of Chinese, Indian or White ethnicity are below average. Levels of proficiency in English are below average. Levels of separation or divorce and incidence of disability are both above average. Education is typically limited to Level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. Few residents work in professional or managerial occupations but the employment structure is otherwise diverse: it includes skilled trades, caring, leisure and other service occupations, sales and customer service occupations, construction, and work as process, plant, and machine operatives.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Lowers is most concentrated in decile 10 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

10
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Lowers falls in decile 5 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

5
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Lowers is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 50-60 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

8
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Lowers, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

Meaning and origin of Lowers

The surname Lowers has its origins in England, tracing back to the early 14th century. It is believed to have derived from the Old English word "lowe," which referred to a small hill or mound. This suggests that the name may have originally been a descriptive term for someone who lived near or on a small hill.

One of the earliest known records of the name Lowers can be found in the Subsidy Rolls of Sussex from 1327, which mention a John Lowers residing in the county. Additionally, the name appears in the Lay Subsidy Rolls of Worcestershire from 1380, listing a William Lowers as a taxpayer.

During the Middle Ages, the name Lowers was particularly prevalent in the counties of Sussex and Worcestershire, though it can also be found in other regions of England. The name likely evolved from various place names that incorporated the word "lowe," such as Lowhill or Lowmoor.

In the 16th century, a notable figure bearing the surname Lowers was John Lowers, a respected theologian and clergyman who served as the Dean of Christ Church, Oxford, from 1567 to 1588. Another influential individual from this period was William Lowers, a prominent merchant who lived in London during the reign of Queen Elizabeth I.

The 17th century saw the birth of Richard Lowers (1610-1691), a renowned English botanist and herbalist who made significant contributions to the study of plants and their medicinal properties. His work, "The Herball," published in 1655, became a seminal text in the field of herbal medicine.

In the 18th century, the name Lowers was associated with Thomas Lowers (1718-1788), a renowned architect and builder who was responsible for designing and constructing several notable buildings in London, including the Royal Exchange and the Bank of England.

Another figure of note was Elizabeth Lowers (1763-1829), a pioneering educator and author who established one of the first schools for girls in England. Her writings on education and women's rights were influential during the early stages of the feminist movement.

Throughout its history, the surname Lowers has been carried by individuals from various walks of life, including scholars, clergymen, merchants, architects, and educators. While the name may have originated as a descriptive term for a geographical location, it has since become a distinct surname with a rich legacy spanning several centuries.

Sourced from namecensus.com.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Lowers families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Lowers surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Surrey leads with 18 Lowers' recorded in 1881 and an index of 7.15x.

County Total Index
Surrey 18 7.15x
Derbyshire 8 9.89x
Lancashire 7 1.14x
Middlesex 7 1.35x
Nottinghamshire 6 8.61x
Essex 4 3.92x
Leicestershire 1 1.75x
Sussex 1 1.15x
Yorkshire 1 0.20x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Camberwell in Surrey leads with 16 Lowers' recorded in 1881 and an index of 48.47x.

Place Total Index
Camberwell 16 48.47x
Litchurch 8 245.40x
Hucknall Torkard 6 338.98x
Lancaster 5 136.99x
Walthamstow 4 108.99x
Bromley London 2 17.59x
Newington 2 10.48x
Pendleton In Salford 2 27.36x
St Pancras London 2 4.81x
Chiswick 1 35.46x
Hackney London 1 3.45x
Hastings St Leonards 1 78.13x
Leicester St Margaret 1 7.16x
Poplar London 1 10.26x
Whitby 1 57.80x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Lowers surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 3
Anne 2
Emma 2
Isabella 2
Louisa 2
Sarah 2
Alice 1
Annie 1
Caroline 1
Edith 1
Eleanore 1
Eliza 1
Elizabeth 1
Ethel 1
Florence 1
Harriett 1
Jane 1
Janer 1
Margaret 1
Maria 1
Rosina 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Lowers surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 10
Henry 3
James 2
William 2
Charles 1
Frank 1
Frederick 1
George 1
Joseph 1
Matthew 1
Michel 1

FAQ

Lowers surname: questions and answers

How common was the Lowers surname in 1881?

In 1881, 53 people were recorded with the Lowers surname. That placed it at #26,134 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Lowers surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 90 in 2016. That gives Lowers a modern rank of #32,202.

What does the Lowers surname mean?

A surname referring to someone who lived near or worked in a lowland area.

What does the Lowers map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Lowers bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.