NameCensus.

UK surname

Lungley

In the 1881 census there were 149 people recorded with the Lungley surname, ranking it #15,551 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 262, ranked #16,256, down from #15,551 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Harwich Dovercourt, Brightlingsea and London parishes. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Tendring and Babergh.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Lungley is 299 in 1911. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 75.8%.

1881 census count

149

Ranked #15,551

Modern count

262

2016, ranked #16,256

Peak year

1911

299 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Lungley had 149 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #15,551 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 262 in 2016, ranked #16,256.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 299 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Spacious Rural Living.

Lungley surname distribution map

The map shows where the Lungley surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Lungley surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Lungley over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 162 #12,215
1861 historical 131 #17,052
1881 historical 149 #15,551
1891 historical 206 #14,597
1901 historical 220 #14,245
1911 historical 299 #11,475
1997 modern 299 #13,563
1998 modern 289 #14,208
1999 modern 287 #14,374
2000 modern 284 #14,457
2001 modern 281 #14,329
2002 modern 281 #14,619
2003 modern 269 #14,855
2004 modern 272 #14,843
2005 modern 265 #15,048
2006 modern 265 #15,126
2007 modern 263 #15,366
2008 modern 252 #15,984
2009 modern 241 #16,848
2010 modern 257 #16,476
2011 modern 253 #16,493
2012 modern 248 #16,618
2013 modern 258 #16,421
2014 modern 259 #16,509
2015 modern 257 #16,475
2016 modern 262 #16,256

Geography

Back to top

Where Lungleys are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Harwich Dovercourt, Brightlingsea, London parishes, Wix or Weeks and Wrabness. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Tendring and Babergh. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Harwich Dovercourt Essex
2 Brightlingsea Essex
3 London parishes London 3
4 Wix or Weeks Essex
5 Wrabness Essex

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Tendring 004 Tendring
2 Babergh 002 Babergh
3 Tendring 003 Tendring
4 Tendring 002 Tendring
5 Tendring 011 Tendring

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Lungley

These lists show first names that appear often with the Lungley surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Lungley

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Lungley, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Retired Professionals

Group

Spacious Rural Living

Nationally, the Lungley surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Spacious Rural Living, within Retired Professionals. This does not mean every Lungley household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These predominantly ageing households typically have no resident dependent children. Most are owner-occupiers and live in detached houses in low density residential developments (although renting is more common than in the rest of the Supergroup). White ethnicity predominates. Residents are typically beyond retirement age but those still in work have managerial, professional or skilled trade occupations. White ethnicity and Christian religious affiliation predominate. Neighbourhoods are located throughout rural UK.

Wider pattern

Typically married but no longer with resident dependent children, these well-educated households either remain working in their managerial, professional, administrative or other skilled occupations, or are retired from them – the modal individual age is beyond normal retirement age. Underoccupied detached and semi-detached properties predominate, and unpaid care is more prevalent than reported disability. The prevalence of this Supergroup outside most urban conurbations indicates that rural lifestyles prevail, typically sustained by using two or more cars per household.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Young Families and Mainstream Employment

Group

Social Rented Sector and Diverse Origins

Within London, Lungley is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector and Diverse Origins, part of Young Families and Mainstream Employment. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Scattered across London’s Inner and Outer suburbs, residents of these neighbourhoods are typically housed in the social rented sector. Although terraced and semi-detached houses predominate, more residents live in flats than elsewhere in the Supergroup. Neighbourhoods are more ethnically diverse than the Supergroup average. Those identifying as of Bangladeshi, Pakistani and some Black ethnicities are more prevalent. Europeans born in a overseas non-EU countries make up more of the lower proportion of residents identifying as White. Few residents are very old (85+). Employment in distribution, hotels and restaurants is more common than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

Many families in these neighbourhoods have young children. Housing is principally in the social rented sector, in terraced or semi-detached units. While over-all residential densities are low, overcrowding is also prevalent locally. Residents are drawn from a range of ethnic minorities, with many identifying as Black and above average numbers born in Africa. Numbers identifying as of Chinese, Indian or White ethnicity are below average. Levels of proficiency in English are below average. Levels of separation or divorce and incidence of disability are both above average. Education is typically limited to Level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. Few residents work in professional or managerial occupations but the employment structure is otherwise diverse: it includes skilled trades, caring, leisure and other service occupations, sales and customer service occupations, construction, and work as process, plant, and machine operatives.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Lungley is most concentrated in decile 2 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the less healthy end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

2
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Lungley falls in decile 6 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

6
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Lungley is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Lungley, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Lungley families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Lungley surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Essex leads with 103 Lungleys recorded in 1881 and an index of 35.90x.

County Total Index
Essex 103 35.90x
Suffolk 10 5.65x
Middlesex 9 0.62x
Surrey 8 1.13x
Kent 7 1.41x
Hampshire 3 1.01x
Monmouthshire 3 2.86x
Durham 2 0.46x
Somerset 2 0.85x
Cornwall 1 0.61x
Sussex 1 0.41x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Bradfield in Essex leads with 19 Lungleys recorded in 1881 and an index of 4634.15x.

Place Total Index
Bradfield 19 4634.15x
Ramsey 14 3684.21x
Wix 11 3548.39x
Brightlingsea 9 548.78x
Wrabness 9 8181.82x
Mistley 8 1038.96x
Clapham 7 38.53x
Ipswich St Mathew 7 141.13x
Prittlewell 7 175.88x
Bromley 5 66.14x
Peldon 5 2173.91x
West Ham 5 7.89x
Hatfield Peverel 4 645.16x
Islington London 4 2.84x
Bedwellty 3 16.17x
Bildeston 3 769.23x
Poplar London 3 10.94x
Tollesbury 3 416.67x
Cockerton 2 143.88x
Harwich St Nicholas 2 90.09x
Kensington London 2 2.48x
Leigh 2 200.00x
Manningtree 2 425.53x
Southampton All Sts 2 39.14x
Weston Super Mare 2 33.84x
Beaumont 1 476.19x
Lee 1 13.89x
Newhaven 1 50.25x
Portsmouth 1 14.58x
Redruth 1 21.51x
Rotherhithe 1 5.57x
Tendring St Nicolas 1 344.83x
Tonbridge 1 5.59x
Wakes Colne 1 400.00x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Lungley surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 9
Ellen 6
Elizabeth 5
Eliza 4
Emma 4
Hannah 3
Margaret 3
Minnie 3
Sarah 3
Fannie 2
Fanny 2
Jane 2
Louisa 2
Martha 2
Alice 1
Ann 1
Annie 1
Cecilina 1
Clara 1
Edith 1
Emily 1
Esther 1
Ethel 1
Eve 1
Flora 1
Frances 1
Francis 1
Harriet 1
Janet 1
Jessie 1
M. 1
Rebecca 1
Reete 1
Rosina 1
Ruth 1
Susan 1
Susana 1
Susanna 1
Susannah 1
Una 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Lungley surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 11
George 8
Charles 6
Robert 5
James 4
John 4
Samuel 4
Arthur 3
David 3
Thomas 3
Henry 2
Joseph 2
Maurice 2
Abraham 1
Alfred 1
Amos 1
C.S. 1
Chas. 1
Ernest 1
Freddy 1
Frederick 1
Goulden 1
Harry 1
Herbert 1
Horace 1
Mauric 1
Rueben 1
Scott 1
Stephen 1

FAQ

Lungley surname: questions and answers

How common was the Lungley surname in 1881?

In 1881, 149 people were recorded with the Lungley surname. That placed it at #15,551 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Lungley surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 262 in 2016. That gives Lungley a modern rank of #16,256.

What does the Lungley map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Lungley bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.