NameCensus.

UK surname

Lutley

In the 1881 census there were 112 people recorded with the Lutley surname, ranking it #18,501 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 77, ranked #33,236, down from #18,501 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Buckland St Mary, Manchester and Wiveliscombe. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Lutley is 112 in 1881. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 31.3%.

1881 census count

112

Ranked #18,501

Modern count

77

2016, ranked #33,236

Peak year

1881

112 bearers

Map years

4

1881 to 1911

Key insights

  • Lutley had 112 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #18,501 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 77 in 2016, ranked #33,236.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 112 in 1881.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is No data.

Lutley surname distribution map

The map shows where the Lutley surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Lutley surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Lutley over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 71 #20,875
1861 historical 74 #24,370
1881 historical 112 #18,501
1891 historical 105 #23,241
1901 historical 104 #22,310
1911 historical 106 #21,948
1997 modern 89 #28,490
1998 modern 91 #28,806
1999 modern 83 #29,823
2000 modern 79 #30,249
2001 modern 80 #29,945
2002 modern 85 #29,867
2003 modern 82 #30,206
2004 modern 79 #30,799
2005 modern 75 #31,400
2006 modern 77 #31,510
2007 modern 77 #31,856
2008 modern 79 #31,957
2009 modern 81 #32,172
2010 modern 85 #32,185
2011 modern 83 #32,336
2012 modern 75 #33,263
2013 modern 77 #33,275
2014 modern 75 #33,473
2015 modern 75 #33,425
2016 modern 77 #33,236

Geography

Back to top

Where Lutleys are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Buckland St Mary, Manchester, Wiveliscombe, Exeter City: Holy Trinity and London parishes. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Buckland St Mary Somerset
2 Manchester Lancashire
3 Wiveliscombe Somerset
4 Exeter City: Holy Trinity Devon
5 London parishes London 2

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 No data No data

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Lutley

These lists show first names that appear often with the Lutley surname in historical and recent records.

Recent female names

No Forenames Found

Recent male names

No Forenames Found

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Lutley

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Lutley, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Nationally, the Lutley surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Lutley household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Within London, Lutley is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Lutley is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Lutley, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Lutley families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Lutley surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Somerset leads with 40 Lutleys recorded in 1881 and an index of 22.75x.

County Total Index
Somerset 40 22.75x
Devon 28 12.31x
Brecknockshire 8 36.63x
Herefordshire 6 13.40x
Sussex 6 3.26x
Kent 5 1.34x
Lancashire 5 0.39x
Worcestershire 5 3.51x
Surrey 4 0.75x
Cornwall 2 1.62x
Glamorgan 1 0.53x
Monmouthshire 1 1.27x
Warwickshire 1 0.36x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Hemyock in Devon leads with 20 Lutleys recorded in 1881 and an index of 5882.35x.

Place Total Index
Hemyock 20 5882.35x
Wiveliscombe 15 1530.61x
Carhampton 11 4583.33x
Llangattock 8 449.44x
Nortonwith 6 2727.27x
Kidderminster Borough 5 59.88x
Salford 5 13.12x
Yeovil 5 140.06x
Foots Cray 4 563.38x
Hellingly 3 483.87x
Holy Trinity 3 625.00x
Lambeth 3 3.15x
Brighton 2 5.38x
Buckland St Mary 2 869.57x
Exeter Heavitree 2 117.65x
Tywardreath 2 253.16x
Baltonsborough 1 384.62x
Birmingham 1 1.09x
Bridgewater 1 20.96x
Broomfield 1 625.00x
Charlinch 1 1428.57x
Chepstow 1 74.63x
Coyty Lower 1 81.30x
Exeter St Sidwell 1 19.19x
Exeter St Thomas The 1 43.10x
Hailsham 1 90.09x
Milverton 1 153.85x
Newton St Cyres 1 312.50x
Plumstead 1 8.05x
Streatham 1 12.35x
Taunton St Mary 1 30.96x
Wellington 1 42.02x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Lutley surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 7
Annie 4
Elizabeth 4
Emma 4
Emily 3
Sarah 3
Alice 2
Ann 2
Catherine 2
Eliza 2
Kate 2
Agnes 1
Anne 1
Caroline 1
Ethel 1
Florence 1
Franc 1
Frances 1
Geraldine 1
Gertrude 1
Gwendoline 1
Hannah 1
Helen 1
Jane 1
Joan 1
Julia 1
Kazaiah 1
Letitia 1
Lomma 1
Louisa 1
Maggie 1
Marey 1
Marian 1
Nellie 1
Prudence 1
Roasanna 1
Sophia 1
Susanna 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Lutley surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 7
Edward 5
James 5
William 5
Thomas 4
Arthur 2
Charles 2
Frank 2
Frederick 2
Robert 2
Abraham 1
Albert 1
Archibald 1
Edwin 1
Elexander 1
Ernest 1
Fred 1
Fredk. 1
Harold 1
Harry 1
Henry 1
Herbert 1
Jame 1
Samuel 1

FAQ

Lutley surname: questions and answers

How common was the Lutley surname in 1881?

In 1881, 112 people were recorded with the Lutley surname. That placed it at #18,501 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Lutley surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 77 in 2016. That gives Lutley a modern rank of #33,236.

What does the Lutley map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Lutley bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.