NameCensus.

UK surname

Marklew

In the 1881 census there were 241 people recorded with the Marklew surname, ranking it #11,374 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 773, ranked #7,118, up from #11,374 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Polesworth, Norton-under-Cannock with Little Wyrley and Ogly Hay. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Lichfield, Walsall and Craven.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Marklew is 812 in 2010. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 220.7%.

1881 census count

241

Ranked #11,374

Modern count

773

2016, ranked #7,118

Peak year

2010

812 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Marklew had 241 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #11,374 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 773 in 2016, ranked #7,118.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 494 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Rural Amenity.

Marklew surname distribution map

The map shows where the Marklew surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Marklew surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Marklew over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 154 #12,668
1861 historical 142 #15,982
1881 historical 241 #11,374
1891 historical 310 #10,812
1901 historical 422 #9,128
1911 historical 494 #7,886
1997 modern 781 #6,668
1998 modern 770 #6,968
1999 modern 777 #6,948
2000 modern 782 #6,899
2001 modern 755 #6,952
2002 modern 761 #7,035
2003 modern 746 #7,049
2004 modern 750 #7,015
2005 modern 748 #6,975
2006 modern 748 #6,996
2007 modern 762 #6,964
2008 modern 779 #6,903
2009 modern 796 #6,922
2010 modern 812 #6,930
2011 modern 791 #7,018
2012 modern 779 #7,012
2013 modern 785 #7,077
2014 modern 781 #7,135
2015 modern 777 #7,103
2016 modern 773 #7,118

Geography

Back to top

Where Marklews are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Polesworth, Norton-under-Cannock with Little Wyrley, Ogly Hay, Walsall and Birmingham Town: Birmingham. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Lichfield, Walsall and Craven. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Polesworth Warwickshire
2 Norton-under-Cannock with Little Wyrley Staffordshire
3 Ogly Hay Staffordshire
4 Walsall Staffordshire
5 Birmingham Town: Birmingham Warwickshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Lichfield 006 Lichfield
2 Walsall 005 Walsall
3 Walsall 002 Walsall
4 Craven 008 Craven
5 Walsall 004 Walsall

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Marklew

These lists show first names that appear often with the Marklew surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Marklew

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Marklew, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Rural Amenity

Nationally, the Marklew surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Rural Amenity, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Marklew household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group comprises older parents or retirees, with no resident dependent children, and with the lowest residential densities in this Supergroup. Predominantly UK-born, residents typically live in detached houses, although others do live in semi-detached and terraced properties. The level of multiple car ownership is the highest in this Supergroup. Most houses are owner occupied although social renting is also present. Many concentrations occur in high amenity rural locations, such as Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburban Asian Communities

Group

Settled Semi-Detached Asians

Within London, Marklew is most associated with areas classed as Settled Semi-Detached Asians, part of Suburban Asian Communities. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These residents share Supergroup characteristics of large (non-Chinese) Asian populations but those identifying as Bangladeshi are notably absent. Many residents were born in the UK, while other more recent migrants have African birthplaces. Semi-detached housing, much of it owner occupied, prevails in these suburban residential locations.

Wider London pattern

Many residents of these neighbourhoods are of (non-Chinese) Asian descent, with many identifying as Indian, Pakistani or Bangladeshi. Neighbourhoods are located across large areas of suburban west, north-east and south London. Detached, semi-detached and terraced houses are more prevalent than flats and socially rented housing is uncommon. Few residents live in communal establishments. Many families have dependent children, sometimes in overcrowded accommodation, and few households are ethnically mixed. Marriage rates are above the London average. The even age distribution, relative absence of individuals living alone and frequent incidence of households with children suggests that multi-generation households may be relatively common. Employment is often in skilled trades, elementary, sales and customer service occupations, and roles as process, plant, and machine operatives. Manufacturing and construction are well represented, along with employment in distribution, hotels, and restaurants. Many adults have only level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. English is not used at home by some residents. Religious affiliation is above average.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Marklew is most concentrated in decile 7 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

7
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Marklew falls in decile 5 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

5
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Marklew is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Marklew, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Marklew families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Marklew surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Staffordshire leads with 125 Marklews recorded in 1881 and an index of 15.75x.

County Total Index
Staffordshire 125 15.75x
Warwickshire 68 11.47x
Derbyshire 13 3.53x
Lancashire 11 0.39x
Essex 6 1.29x
Lanarkshire 6 0.79x
Yorkshire 6 0.26x
Nottinghamshire 3 0.95x
Middlesex 2 0.09x
Cambridgeshire 1 0.67x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Norton Canes in Staffordshire leads with 38 Marklews recorded in 1881 and an index of 1314.88x.

Place Total Index
Norton Canes 38 1314.88x
Birmingham 33 16.70x
Ogley Hay 23 1393.94x
Aston 20 12.25x
Armitage 15 1456.31x
Polesworth 15 533.81x
Alfreton 11 98.39x
Burntwood Edial 11 216.96x
Tipton 11 45.27x
Cannock 10 72.20x
Walsall Foreign 8 19.52x
Barony 6 3.12x
West Ham 6 5.86x
Spotland 4 12.90x
Walton On Hill 4 26.47x
Bentham 3 168.54x
Worksop 3 31.91x
Burton Upon Trent 2 10.77x
Settle 2 112.36x
St Marylebone London 2 1.59x
Tamworth 2 47.17x
Bolsover 1 54.05x
Bootle Cum Linacre 1 4.51x
Burslem 1 4.40x
Cheslyn Hay 1 68.97x
Failsworth 1 15.67x
Lawkland 1 416.67x
Lichfield St Michael 1 40.16x
Manchester 1 0.80x
Rushall 1 21.41x
Shenstone 1 49.51x
Spondon 1 70.42x
Whittlesey St Mary St 1 19.23x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Marklew surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 13
Elizabeth 12
Sarah 9
Emma 7
Jane 6
Caroline 5
Emily 4
Eliza 3
Ellen 3
Hannah 3
Maria 3
Matilda 3
Amelia 2
Ann 2
Anne 2
Annie 2
Florance 2
Harriet 2
Ada 1
Addie 1
Agnes 1
Alberta 1
Alice 1
Amy 1
Clara 1
E. 1
Eleanor 1
Esther 1
Helena 1
Jammima 1
Jennie 1
Joanna 1
Kate 1
Katherine 1
Laura 1
Lavinia 1
Lucy 1
Margaret 1
Minnie 1
Miriam 1
Nelly 1
Phoebe 1
Priscilla 1
Rebecca 1
Selina 1
Sophia 1
Zibiah 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Marklew surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 17
William 17
Joseph 10
Thomas 9
Edward 7
James 7
Charles 6
Samuel 6
Arthur 3
George 3
Henry 3
Wm. 3
Alfred 2
David 2
Ernest 2
Herbert 2
Richard 2
Robert 2
Walter 2
Abel 1
Abraham 1
Cain 1
Edwin 1
Eli 1
Elijah 1
Enoch 1
France 1
Francis 1
Frederick 1
Fredk. 1
Harry 1
Henery 1
Israel 1
Jno. 1
L. 1
Roland 1
Saml. 1

FAQ

Marklew surname: questions and answers

How common was the Marklew surname in 1881?

In 1881, 241 people were recorded with the Marklew surname. That placed it at #11,374 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Marklew surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 773 in 2016. That gives Marklew a modern rank of #7,118.

What does the Marklew map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Marklew bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.