NameCensus.

UK surname

Mashiter

In the 1881 census there were 229 people recorded with the Mashiter surname, ranking it #11,784 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 206, ranked #19,183, down from #11,784 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Lancaster Borough, Melling and Preston. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Lancaster, South Lakeland and Calderdale.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Mashiter is 330 in 1911. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 10.0%.

1881 census count

229

Ranked #11,784

Modern count

206

2016, ranked #19,183

Peak year

1911

330 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Mashiter had 229 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #11,784 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 206 in 2016, ranked #19,183.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 330 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Small Town Suburbia.

Mashiter surname distribution map

The map shows where the Mashiter surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Mashiter surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Mashiter over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 134 #14,033
1861 historical 192 #12,423
1881 historical 229 #11,784
1891 historical 325 #10,426
1901 historical 315 #11,263
1911 historical 330 #10,669
1997 modern 244 #15,520
1998 modern 244 #15,947
1999 modern 249 #15,844
2000 modern 237 #16,331
2001 modern 235 #16,147
2002 modern 237 #16,413
2003 modern 235 #16,291
2004 modern 239 #16,193
2005 modern 232 #16,480
2006 modern 226 #16,891
2007 modern 221 #17,343
2008 modern 217 #17,693
2009 modern 225 #17,631
2010 modern 219 #18,319
2011 modern 220 #18,096
2012 modern 230 #17,479
2013 modern 238 #17,354
2014 modern 227 #18,029
2015 modern 215 #18,659
2016 modern 206 #19,183

Geography

Back to top

Where Mashiters are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Lancaster Borough, Melling, Preston, Heysham and Blackburn. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Lancaster, South Lakeland, Calderdale, Ribble Valley and Blackpool. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Lancaster Borough Lancashire
2 Melling Lancashire
3 Preston Lancashire
4 Heysham Lancashire
5 Blackburn Lancashire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Lancaster 016 Lancaster
2 South Lakeland 011 South Lakeland
3 Calderdale 018 Calderdale
4 Ribble Valley 003 Ribble Valley
5 Blackpool 015 Blackpool

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Mashiter

These lists show first names that appear often with the Mashiter surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Mashiter

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Mashiter, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Retired Professionals

Group

Small Town Suburbia

Nationally, the Mashiter surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Small Town Suburbia, within Retired Professionals. This does not mean every Mashiter household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group is predominantly comprised of married couples with no resident dependent children, living in areas characterised neither by under-occupancy nor overcrowding throughout the UK in or adjacent to small towns. White ethnic groups and affiliation with Christianity predominates. Housing tends to be predominantly semi-detached or detached and workers are employed principally in managerial and professional occupations, with semi-skilled occupations also in evidence. These areas of the Supergroup are of higher population density.

Wider pattern

Typically married but no longer with resident dependent children, these well-educated households either remain working in their managerial, professional, administrative or other skilled occupations, or are retired from them – the modal individual age is beyond normal retirement age. Underoccupied detached and semi-detached properties predominate, and unpaid care is more prevalent than reported disability. The prevalence of this Supergroup outside most urban conurbations indicates that rural lifestyles prevail, typically sustained by using two or more cars per household.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Central Connected Professionals and Managers

Group

Senior Professionals

Within London, Mashiter is most associated with areas classed as Senior Professionals, part of Central Connected Professionals and Managers. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These very central neighbourhoods house residents whose ages are more skewed towards older age cohorts than elsewhere in the Supergroup. Few households have young children. Rates of illness are low. Indian ethnicity is rare compared to the Supergroup mean. Property under occupation is more common, despite the centrality of neighbourhoods, and more residents live in communal establishments than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

Adult residents of these neighbourhoods are typically aged 25 to 44, working full-time in professional, managerial or associate professional occupations. There are few families with dependent children. The predominantly Inner London neighbourhoods have an international character, including many residents born elsewhere in Europe alongside high numbers of individuals identifying as of Chinese ethnicity. Many individuals are never married, childless and/or living alone. Above average numbers of individuals, likely to be full-time students, live in communal establishments. Elsewhere, privately rented flats are the dominant housing type. Residents of these areas are well-qualified, with a significant number holding Level 4 or above qualifications. There is a correspondingly high level of individuals employed full-time in professional, managerial and associated professional or technical occupations. Employing industries are financial, real estate, professional, administration, and, to a lesser degree, transport and communications. Unemployment is uncommon.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Mashiter is most concentrated in decile 4 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

4
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Mashiter falls in decile 6 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

6
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Mashiter is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Mashiter, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Mashiter families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Mashiter surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Lancashire leads with 141 Mashiters recorded in 1881 and an index of 5.32x.

County Total Index
Lancashire 141 5.32x
Westmorland 48 97.78x
Cumberland 18 9.36x
Cheshire 10 2.03x
Surrey 5 0.46x
Essex 4 0.91x
Sussex 2 0.53x
Yorkshire 1 0.05x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Heversham With Milnthorpe in Westmorland leads with 30 Mashiters recorded in 1881 and an index of 2542.37x.

Place Total Index
Heversham With Milnthorpe 30 2542.37x
Blackburn 21 29.78x
Heysham 15 3125.00x
Preston 14 19.74x
Lancaster 11 69.75x
Birkenhead 9 22.89x
Low Bolton 9 1836.73x
Ponsonby 9 6923.08x
Roeburndale 9 10000.00x
Barrow In Furness 8 22.19x
Underbarrow Bradley 8 2285.71x
Carnforth 7 479.45x
Scotforth 7 406.98x
Ulverston 7 90.67x
Farleton 6 6666.67x
Livesey 6 129.03x
Layton With Warbreck 5 51.39x
Newington 5 6.06x
Dalton In Furness 4 39.10x
Holme 4 666.67x
Hornby 4 1481.48x
Romford 4 57.39x
Ambleside 3 197.37x
Colton 3 217.39x
Brighton 2 2.63x
Caton 2 240.96x
Liverpool 2 1.24x
Mansergh 2 1111.11x
Salford 2 2.57x
Beetham 1 131.58x
Bolton Le Sands 1 166.67x
Cockerham 1 147.06x
Garston 1 12.79x
Halton 1 178.57x
Kirkdale 1 2.24x
Little Bolton 1 2.93x
Rawdon 1 38.31x
Tatham 1 243.90x
Tonge With Haulgh 1 19.38x
Tranmere 1 5.52x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Mashiter surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 15
Elizabeth 13
Jane 13
Margaret 10
Ellen 7
Ann 6
Alice 5
Isabella 4
Agnes 3
Sarah 3
Annie 2
Dorothy 2
Elenor 2
Lucy 2
Rachael 2
Ruth 2
Beatrice 1
Caroline 1
Cassandra 1
Daisey 1
Deborah 1
Eliza 1
Elizth. 1
Emily 1
Fanny 1
Florence 1
Frances 1
Georgiana 1
Hannah 1
Janet 1
Julia 1
Kate 1
Laura 1
Margret 1
Margt.Alice 1
Marie 1
Martha 1
Parnell 1
Prudence 1
Rebecca 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Mashiter surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Thomas 21
John 19
William 17
Robert 12
James 10
Richard 8
Edward 5
Joseph 3
Leonard 3
George 2
Roger 2
Alfred 1
Charles 1
Daniel 1
Edwin 1
Henry 1
Marmaduke 1
Miles 1
Peter 1
Richd. 1
Tho. 1
Thos. 1
Walter 1

FAQ

Mashiter surname: questions and answers

How common was the Mashiter surname in 1881?

In 1881, 229 people were recorded with the Mashiter surname. That placed it at #11,784 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Mashiter surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 206 in 2016. That gives Mashiter a modern rank of #19,183.

What does the Mashiter map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Mashiter bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.