NameCensus.

UK surname

Mines

An occupational surname referring to a miner or someone who worked in mines.

In the 1881 census there were 373 people recorded with the Mines surname, ranking it #8,380 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 393, ranked #12,032, down from #8,380 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Bristol City: St Mary Redcliff, London parishes and Warminster, Upton Scudamore, Great and Little Corsley, Norton Bavant. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include St. Helens, Tameside and Mendip.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Mines is 505 in 1901. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 5.4%.

1881 census count

373

Ranked #8,380

Modern count

393

2016, ranked #12,032

Peak year

1901

505 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Mines had 373 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #8,380 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 393 in 2016, ranked #12,032.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 505 in 1901.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Rural Amenity.

Mines surname distribution map

The map shows where the Mines surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Mines surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Mines over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 307 #7,502
1861 historical 374 #6,826
1881 historical 373 #8,380
1891 historical 436 #8,262
1901 historical 505 #7,988
1911 historical 488 #7,980
1997 modern 437 #10,299
1998 modern 448 #10,442
1999 modern 448 #10,482
2000 modern 446 #10,516
2001 modern 430 #10,619
2002 modern 423 #10,975
2003 modern 418 #10,896
2004 modern 419 #10,903
2005 modern 418 #10,812
2006 modern 407 #11,087
2007 modern 429 #10,747
2008 modern 423 #10,975
2009 modern 445 #10,780
2010 modern 436 #11,189
2011 modern 425 #11,285
2012 modern 398 #11,755
2013 modern 412 #11,647
2014 modern 414 #11,708
2015 modern 392 #12,092
2016 modern 393 #12,032

Geography

Back to top

Where Mines' are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Bristol City: St Mary Redcliff, London parishes, Warminster, Upton Scudamore, Great and Little Corsley, Norton Bavant and West Wycombe. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to St. Helens, Tameside and Mendip. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Bristol City: St Mary Redcliff Gloucestershire
2 London parishes London 1
3 London parishes London 3
4 Warminster, Upton Scudamore, Great and Little Corsley, Norton Bavant Wiltshire
5 West Wycombe Buckinghamshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 St. Helens 019 St. Helens
2 Tameside 027 Tameside
3 Mendip 003 Mendip
4 Mendip 002 Mendip
5 St. Helens 023 St. Helens

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Mines

These lists show first names that appear often with the Mines surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Mines

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Mines, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Rural Amenity

Nationally, the Mines surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Rural Amenity, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Mines household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group comprises older parents or retirees, with no resident dependent children, and with the lowest residential densities in this Supergroup. Predominantly UK-born, residents typically live in detached houses, although others do live in semi-detached and terraced properties. The level of multiple car ownership is the highest in this Supergroup. Most houses are owner occupied although social renting is also present. Many concentrations occur in high amenity rural locations, such as Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Social Rented Sector Families with Children

Group

Social Rented Sector Pockets

Within London, Mines is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector Pockets, part of Social Rented Sector Families with Children. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Found in pockets across London, residents are less likely to live in private sector rentals and fewer adults are students. Fewer individuals work in transport and communications occupations relative to the Supergroup average. More individuals identify as Black and were born in Africa.

Wider London pattern

Residents of these neighbourhoods include sizable numbers identifying with ethnicities originating outside Europe, particularly in Africa or Bangladesh. The proportion of residents identifying as White, Indian or Pakistani is well below the London average. Neighbourhood age profiles are skewed towards younger adults, and above average numbers of families have children. Rates of use of English at home are below average. Marriage rates are low, and levels of separation or divorce are above average. Housing is predominantly in flats, and renting in the social rented sector the norm - few residents are owner occupiers. Housing is often overcrowded, and neighbourhoods are amongst the most densely populated in London. Disability rates are above average, although levels of unpaid care provision are about average. Employment is in caring, leisure, other service occupations, sales and customer service, or process, plant, and machine operation. Part time working and full-time student study are common. Levels of unemployment are slightly above average. Most residents have only Level 1 or 2 educational qualifications or have completed apprenticeships.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Mines is most concentrated in decile 3 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the less healthy end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

3
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Mines falls in decile 5 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

5
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Mines is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Mines, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

Meaning and origin of Mines

The surname "Mines" is believed to have originated in England, with the earliest records dating back to the 13th century. It is thought to be a locational name, derived from various place names in England containing the Old English word "mine," which referred to a mine or pit.

One of the earliest recorded instances of the name can be found in the Hundred Rolls of Bedfordshire from 1273, which mention a person named Geoffrey de la Myne. This suggests that the name may have initially been derived from a place name containing the word "mine," with the prefix "de la" indicating "of the."

Another early reference to the name appears in the Subsidy Rolls of Worcestershire from 1327, which list a person named John atte Myne. The prefix "atte" in this case means "at the," further reinforcing the connection to a place name associated with mining.

In the 14th century, the name appears in various spellings, such as "Myne," "Myn," and "Myne." These spellings reflect the evolving nature of English orthography during that period.

One notable historical figure bearing the surname "Mines" was Thomas Mines (c. 1515-1584), an English Protestant reformer and Bishop of Peterborough. He played a significant role in the English Reformation under King Edward VI and Queen Elizabeth I.

Another prominent individual with this surname was Sir Christopher Mines (c. 1590-1658), an English merchant and Member of Parliament who served as the Governor of the East India Company from 1638 to 1641.

In the 17th century, the name appears in various records, including the Parish Registers of Gloucestershire, which mention a person named William Mines in 1628.

During the 18th century, the surname is found in various parts of England, with notable individuals such as John Mines (1688-1756), a clergyman and author from Berkshire, and Samuel Mines (1717-1786), a merchant and philanthropist from London.

In the 19th century, the name continues to be found in various regions of England, with individuals like William Mines (1793-1856), a civil engineer from Gloucestershire, and Mary Ann Mines (1826-1905), a philanthropist and social reformer from Yorkshire.

Sourced from namecensus.com.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Mines families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Mines surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Middlesex leads with 72 Mines' recorded in 1881 and an index of 1.99x.

County Total Index
Middlesex 72 1.99x
Wiltshire 64 20.00x
Somerset 55 9.44x
Buckinghamshire 44 20.11x
Lancashire 38 0.88x
Surrey 18 1.02x
Cheshire 13 1.63x
Gloucestershire 13 1.83x
Berkshire 7 2.58x
Glamorgan 5 0.79x
Hertfordshire 5 2.00x
Kent 5 0.40x
Hampshire 4 0.54x
Lanarkshire 4 0.34x
Monmouthshire 4 1.53x
Devon 3 0.40x
Essex 3 0.42x
Oxfordshire 3 1.34x
Durham 2 0.19x
Worcestershire 2 0.42x
Bedfordshire 1 0.53x
Dorset 1 0.42x
Northumberland 1 0.19x
Staffordshire 1 0.08x
Suffolk 1 0.23x
Sussex 1 0.16x
Yorkshire 1 0.03x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Corsley in Wiltshire leads with 49 Mines' recorded in 1881 and an index of 3888.89x.

Place Total Index
Corsley 49 3888.89x
Frome 29 208.18x
West Wycombe 17 572.39x
Parr 15 97.66x
Wycombe 13 79.71x
Bedminster 11 20.10x
Lambeth 11 3.49x
Everton 8 5.85x
Hackney London 8 3.94x
Liverpool 8 3.07x
Mile End Old Town 8 14.00x
Bethnal Green London 7 4.45x
Higher Bebington 7 136.99x
Shoreditch London 6 3.82x
St Pancras London 6 2.06x
Bristol St Philip Jacob 5 7.48x
Cardiff St Mary 5 14.41x
Cheltenham 5 9.13x
Chester St Mary On Hill 5 72.99x
Downton 5 119.33x
Hughenden 5 224.22x
Reading St Giles 5 18.76x
Warminster 5 71.33x
Westminster St John 5 11.35x
Aberystruth 4 17.35x
Berkhampstead 4 71.30x
Charterhouse Hinton 4 588.24x
Chelsea London 4 3.67x
Clerkenwell London 4 4.68x
Edmonton 4 13.72x
Great Hampden 4 1250.00x
Islington London 4 1.14x
Swainswick 4 512.82x
Deptford St Nicholas 3 30.61x
Freshford 3 600.00x
Hambleden 3 160.43x
Harrow 3 54.25x
Heston 3 24.96x
Kensington London 3 1.49x
Kirkdale 3 4.15x
Manchester 3 1.55x
Stoke Damerel 3 5.69x
West Ham 3 1.90x
Barony 2 0.68x
Battersea 2 1.50x
Fisherton Anger 2 33.78x
Kingstanley 2 76.34x
Millbrook 2 10.71x
Newington 2 1.50x
Old Monkland 2 4.31x
Reading St Lawrence 2 34.42x
Rotherfield Greys 2 84.39x
St George Hanover 2 4.23x
Westoe 2 3.28x
Whatley 2 370.37x
Bow London 1 2.17x
Box 1 36.63x
Brightside Bierlow 1 1.42x
Bury St Edmunds St James 1 8.50x
Camberwell 1 0.43x
Corfe Castle 1 45.45x
Egham 1 9.23x
Folkestone 1 4.18x
Great Malvern 1 10.14x
Hill Deverill 1 588.24x
Holdenhurst 1 5.14x
Horton 1 93.46x
Leighton Buzzard 1 12.41x
Monckton Combe 1 53.76x
Newcastle On Tyne St 1 3.58x
Paddington London 1 0.75x
Portsea 1 0.69x
Richmond 1 4.05x
St Dunstan In West 1 128.21x
St Marylebone London 1 0.52x
Tranmere 1 3.41x
Twickenham 1 6.44x
Warrington 1 1.96x
West Bromwich 1 1.43x
Yardley 1 8.27x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Mines surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 25
Sarah 13
Eliza 10
Elizabeth 9
Emma 8
Ellen 7
Emily 7
Jane 7
Ann 6
Louisa 6
Annie 5
Charlotte 4
Fanny 4
Agnes 3
Alice 3
Caroline 3
Esther 3
Florence 3
Grace 3
Maria 3
Catherine 2
Eleanor 2
Hannah 2
Harriet 2
Jemima 2
Julia 2
Margaret 2
Martha 2
Matilda 2
Amy 1
Anne 1
Beatrice 1
Bertha 1
Berthan 1
Besie 1
Catheline 1
Elisa 1
Elizh. 1
Eugenie 1
Honourinivoch 1
Isabella 1
Jessie 1
Johanna 1
Kate 1
Laura 1
Louis 1
Louise 1
Lucy 1
Mabel 1
Thersa 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Mines surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 20
William 20
George 17
Henry 11
Albert 9
James 9
Joseph 8
Thomas 7
Charles 5
Frederick 5
Edward 4
Robert 4
Walter 4
Ernest 3
Alfred 2
Arthur 2
Benjamin 2
Herbert 2
Richard 2
Stephen 2
Wm. 2
Bejemin 1
Chas. 1
Clab 1
Clouse 1
Dan 1
David 1
Earnest 1
Edwin 1
Elias 1
Elijah 1
Emanuel 1
Enos 1
Francis 1
Frank 1
Fredrick 1
H.C. 1
Harry 1
J. 1
Jabez 1
Jas. 1
Joshua 1
Josiah 1
Laurence 1
Lawrence 1
Mark 1
Morgan 1
Moses 1
Ralph 1
Richd. 1

FAQ

Mines surname: questions and answers

How common was the Mines surname in 1881?

In 1881, 373 people were recorded with the Mines surname. That placed it at #8,380 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Mines surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 393 in 2016. That gives Mines a modern rank of #12,032.

What does the Mines surname mean?

An occupational surname referring to a miner or someone who worked in mines.

What does the Mines map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Mines bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.