NameCensus.

UK surname

Missing

In the 1881 census there were 72 people recorded with the Missing surname, ranking it #23,371 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 104, ranked #30,317, down from #23,371 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to London parishes, Pluckley with Pevington and Fulbourn. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Ashford, South Cambridgeshire and Luton.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Missing is 135 in 1998. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 44.4%.

1881 census count

72

Ranked #23,371

Modern count

104

2016, ranked #30,317

Peak year

1998

135 bearers

Map years

4

1911 to 2016

Key insights

  • Missing had 72 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #23,371 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 104 in 2016, ranked #30,317.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 125 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Rural Amenity.

Missing surname distribution map

The map shows where the Missing surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Missing surname density by area, 2016 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Missing over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 75 #20,268
1861 historical 50 #27,636
1881 historical 72 #23,371
1891 historical 85 #26,080
1901 historical 82 #25,019
1911 historical 125 #19,932
1997 modern 122 #23,917
1998 modern 135 #23,118
1999 modern 127 #24,125
2000 modern 126 #24,220
2001 modern 124 #24,114
2002 modern 117 #25,494
2003 modern 116 #25,415
2004 modern 118 #25,317
2005 modern 116 #25,564
2006 modern 115 #25,969
2007 modern 108 #27,391
2008 modern 105 #28,180
2009 modern 108 #28,311
2010 modern 108 #28,996
2011 modern 102 #29,759
2012 modern 97 #30,798
2013 modern 98 #31,078
2014 modern 99 #31,186
2015 modern 101 #30,816
2016 modern 104 #30,317

Geography

Back to top

Where Missings are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around London parishes, Pluckley with Pevington, Fulbourn and Tunbridge, Bidborough. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Ashford, South Cambridgeshire, Luton and Chelmsford. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 London parishes London 1
2 Pluckley with Pevington Kent
3 London parishes London 3
4 Fulbourn Cambridgeshire
5 Tunbridge, Bidborough Kent

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Ashford 002 Ashford
2 South Cambridgeshire 011 South Cambridgeshire
3 Luton 014 Luton
4 Chelmsford 017 Chelmsford
5 Ashford 010 Ashford

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Missing

These lists show first names that appear often with the Missing surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Missing

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Missing, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Rural Amenity

Nationally, the Missing surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Rural Amenity, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Missing household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group comprises older parents or retirees, with no resident dependent children, and with the lowest residential densities in this Supergroup. Predominantly UK-born, residents typically live in detached houses, although others do live in semi-detached and terraced properties. The level of multiple car ownership is the highest in this Supergroup. Most houses are owner occupied although social renting is also present. Many concentrations occur in high amenity rural locations, such as Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Young Families and Mainstream Employment

Group

Social Rented Sector and Diverse Origins

Within London, Missing is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector and Diverse Origins, part of Young Families and Mainstream Employment. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Scattered across London’s Inner and Outer suburbs, residents of these neighbourhoods are typically housed in the social rented sector. Although terraced and semi-detached houses predominate, more residents live in flats than elsewhere in the Supergroup. Neighbourhoods are more ethnically diverse than the Supergroup average. Those identifying as of Bangladeshi, Pakistani and some Black ethnicities are more prevalent. Europeans born in a overseas non-EU countries make up more of the lower proportion of residents identifying as White. Few residents are very old (85+). Employment in distribution, hotels and restaurants is more common than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

Many families in these neighbourhoods have young children. Housing is principally in the social rented sector, in terraced or semi-detached units. While over-all residential densities are low, overcrowding is also prevalent locally. Residents are drawn from a range of ethnic minorities, with many identifying as Black and above average numbers born in Africa. Numbers identifying as of Chinese, Indian or White ethnicity are below average. Levels of proficiency in English are below average. Levels of separation or divorce and incidence of disability are both above average. Education is typically limited to Level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. Few residents work in professional or managerial occupations but the employment structure is otherwise diverse: it includes skilled trades, caring, leisure and other service occupations, sales and customer service occupations, construction, and work as process, plant, and machine operatives.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Missing is most concentrated in decile 7 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

7
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Missing falls in decile 6 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

6
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Missing is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Missing, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Missing families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Missing surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Kent leads with 37 Missings recorded in 1881 and an index of 15.44x.

County Total Index
Kent 37 15.44x
Cambridgeshire 19 42.72x
Surrey 8 2.34x
Middlesex 4 0.57x
Sussex 4 3.38x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Fulbourn in Cambridgeshire leads with 17 Missings recorded in 1881 and an index of 3953.49x.

Place Total Index
Fulbourn 17 3953.49x
Pluckley 16 7272.73x
Bermondsey 6 28.69x
Canterbury St Andrew 6 6000.00x
Tonbridge 6 69.44x
Brighton 4 16.74x
Little Chart 4 5714.29x
Hammersmith London 3 17.34x
Lambeth 2 3.27x
Barton 1 1250.00x
Bexley 1 47.17x
Biddenden 1 303.03x
Gravesend 1 49.26x
Lewisham 1 7.82x
St Andrewthe Great 1 172.41x
St Gregory By St Pauls 1 555.56x
Strood 1 72.99x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Missing surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 7
Ann 3
Emma 3
Charlotte 2
Harriet 2
Jane 2
Louisa 2
Sarah 2
Anne 1
Cathe. 1
Catherine 1
Edith 1
Elizabeth 1
Elizth. 1
Emily 1
Fanny 1
Florence 1
Lucy 1
Margeret 1
Marion 1
Rosa 1
Rosina 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Missing surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
George 6
Thomas 4
William 4
Alfred 2
Arthur 2
Edwin 2
Ernest 2
John 2
Stephen 2
David 1
Frank 1
Harry 1
Horatio 1
James 1
Moses 1
Richard 1
Robert 1
Wm. 1

FAQ

Missing surname: questions and answers

How common was the Missing surname in 1881?

In 1881, 72 people were recorded with the Missing surname. That placed it at #23,371 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Missing surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 104 in 2016. That gives Missing a modern rank of #30,317.

What does the Missing map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Missing bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.