NameCensus.

UK surname

Mynett

In the 1881 census there were 144 people recorded with the Mynett surname, ranking it #15,891 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 354, ranked #13,054, up from #15,891 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to London parishes, Lenton, Radford, Papplewick, Nuthall, Greasley, Brewhouse Yard and Hatfield Peverell. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Barnsley, Thurrock and Broadland.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Mynett is 367 in 1998. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 145.8%.

1881 census count

144

Ranked #15,891

Modern count

354

2016, ranked #13,054

Peak year

1998

367 bearers

Map years

7

1881 to 2016

Key insights

  • Mynett had 144 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #15,891 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 354 in 2016, ranked #13,054.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 314 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Rural Amenity.

Mynett surname distribution map

The map shows where the Mynett surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Mynett surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Mynett over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 75 #20,268
1861 historical 61 #26,170
1881 historical 144 #15,891
1891 historical 197 #15,101
1901 historical 258 #12,875
1911 historical 314 #11,077
1997 modern 326 #12,811
1998 modern 367 #12,121
1999 modern 365 #12,245
2000 modern 359 #12,333
2001 modern 352 #12,318
2002 modern 362 #12,318
2003 modern 358 #12,208
2004 modern 340 #12,707
2005 modern 342 #12,579
2006 modern 331 #12,990
2007 modern 324 #13,322
2008 modern 327 #13,350
2009 modern 343 #13,168
2010 modern 342 #13,440
2011 modern 340 #13,375
2012 modern 335 #13,408
2013 modern 350 #13,186
2014 modern 353 #13,183
2015 modern 352 #13,109
2016 modern 354 #13,054

Geography

Back to top

Where Mynetts are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around London parishes, Lenton, Radford, Papplewick, Nuthall, Greasley, Brewhouse Yard, Hatfield Peverell and Barnes. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Barnsley, Thurrock, Broadland and Newcastle-under-Lyme. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 London parishes London 1
2 Lenton, Radford, Papplewick, Nuthall, Greasley, Brewhouse Yard Nottinghamshire
3 London parishes London 3
4 Hatfield Peverell Essex
5 Barnes Surrey

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Barnsley 020 Barnsley
2 Barnsley 014 Barnsley
3 Thurrock 012 Thurrock
4 Broadland 014 Broadland
5 Newcastle-under-Lyme 004 Newcastle-under-Lyme

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Mynett

These lists show first names that appear often with the Mynett surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Mynett

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Mynett, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Rural Amenity

Nationally, the Mynett surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Rural Amenity, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Mynett household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group comprises older parents or retirees, with no resident dependent children, and with the lowest residential densities in this Supergroup. Predominantly UK-born, residents typically live in detached houses, although others do live in semi-detached and terraced properties. The level of multiple car ownership is the highest in this Supergroup. Most houses are owner occupied although social renting is also present. Many concentrations occur in high amenity rural locations, such as Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs

Group

Professional Periphery

Within London, Mynett is most associated with areas classed as Professional Periphery, part of Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These neighbourhoods predominantly house residents aged 45+, with many aged 85+. Most employed residents work in senior roles, and relatively few work in unskilled jobs. Terraced housing is comparatively rare, but communal living is more common. More residents identify as of Indian ethnicity and more affiliate with non-Christian religions. Disability levels are below the Supergroup average.

Wider London pattern

The age distribution of these neighbourhoods is skewed towards the middle-aged and old, although few residents live alone or in communal establishments and numbers of dependent children are around average. Owner occupation is the norm, as is residence in detached or semi-detached houses. Residential densities are low and many households have spare rooms. Most residents were born in the UK and, aside from some identifying as members of Chinese or Indian ethnicities, identify as White. Mixed ethnicity households are rare. Incidence of married couples is higher than average and few individuals have never been married. A large proportion of individuals still in employment work in administrative and secretarial occupations, or in the construction industry. Few residents are students, and many households own more than one car.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Mynett is most concentrated in decile 7 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

7
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Mynett falls in decile 10 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the less deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

10
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Mynett is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 60-70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

9
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Mynett, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Mynett families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Mynett surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Gloucestershire leads with 31 Mynetts recorded in 1881 and an index of 11.18x.

County Total Index
Gloucestershire 31 11.18x
Middlesex 19 1.34x
Essex 17 6.09x
Surrey 16 2.32x
Shropshire 10 8.18x
Staffordshire 10 2.09x
Warwickshire 10 2.80x
Worcestershire 8 4.33x
Oxfordshire 7 8.01x
Lancashire 5 0.30x
Nottinghamshire 4 2.10x
Glamorgan 3 1.22x
Somerset 3 1.32x
Royal Navy 1 5.93x
Yorkshire 1 0.07x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Stroud in Gloucestershire leads with 14 Mynetts recorded in 1881 and an index of 259.26x.

Place Total Index
Stroud 14 259.26x
Hatfield Peverel 13 2166.67x
Rodborough 10 746.27x
Lambeth 9 7.30x
Barnes 7 240.55x
Birmingham 7 5.89x
Oxford St Thomas 7 171.57x
St Bartholomew Great 7 542.64x
Kensington London 6 7.63x
Painswick 6 306.12x
Chirbury 5 694.44x
Islington London 5 3.65x
Pelsall 5 352.11x
Nottingham St Mary 4 8.11x
Prescot 4 132.01x
West Bromwich 4 14.64x
Aston Botterell 3 3750.00x
Bedminster 3 14.03x
Hallow 3 333.33x
Merthyr Tydfil 3 12.67x
Aston 2 2.04x
Felstead 2 208.33x
Hanbury 2 400.00x
Langford 2 1818.18x
Cheltenham 1 4.67x
Great Witley 1 555.56x
Kings Norton 1 6.04x
Leeds 1 1.26x
Manchester 1 1.33x
More 1 1000.00x
Paddington London 1 1.92x
Ridgacre 1 277.78x
Royal Navy 1 6.94x
Ryton On Dunsmore 1 454.55x
Stanton Lacy 1 94.34x
Walsall Borough 1 26.95x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Mynett surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 11
Annie 4
Elizabeth 3
Emma 3
Harriet 3
Margaret 3
Sarah 3
Alice 2
Edith 2
Eliza 2
Ellen 2
Esther 2
Hannah 2
Jessie 2
Maria 2
Rose 2
Ada 1
Agnetta 1
Amy 1
Anne 1
Caroline 1
Clara 1
Elina 1
Fanney 1
Georgina 1
Harriett 1
Julia 1
Lillian 1
Lucy 1
Lydia 1
Mabel 1
Marion 1
Pheobe 1
Susan 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Mynett surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 14
John 9
Charles 6
George 6
Arthur 4
Edward 4
James 3
Samuel 3
Thomas 3
Albert 2
Alfred 2
Josiah 2
Richard 2
Robert 2
Sydney 2
Walter 2
Christipher 1
Christopher 1
Edwin 1
Ernest 1
Frank 1
Frederick 1
Harry 1
Herbert 1
Jessie 1
Joseph 1
Natham 1
Pearcy 1
Richd. 1

FAQ

Mynett surname: questions and answers

How common was the Mynett surname in 1881?

In 1881, 144 people were recorded with the Mynett surname. That placed it at #15,891 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Mynett surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 354 in 2016. That gives Mynett a modern rank of #13,054.

What does the Mynett map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Mynett bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.