NameCensus.

UK surname

Olliffe

In the 1881 census there were 129 people recorded with the Olliffe surname, ranking it #17,013 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 261, ranked #16,309, up from #17,013 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Stoke Mandeville, Great and Little Hampden, Hartwell, Stone, Acton and London parishes. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Gloucester, Perth Road and Sutton.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Olliffe is 290 in 2000. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 102.3%.

1881 census count

129

Ranked #17,013

Modern count

261

2016, ranked #16,309

Peak year

2000

290 bearers

Map years

7

1881 to 2016

Key insights

  • Olliffe had 129 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #17,013 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 261 in 2016, ranked #16,309.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 218 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Established Multi-Ethnic Communities.

Olliffe surname distribution map

The map shows where the Olliffe surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Olliffe surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Olliffe over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 51 #24,096
1861 historical 88 #22,554
1881 historical 129 #17,013
1891 historical 128 #20,393
1901 historical 173 #16,579
1911 historical 218 #14,177
1997 modern 257 #14,989
1998 modern 272 #14,846
1999 modern 272 #14,912
2000 modern 290 #14,237
2001 modern 280 #14,364
2002 modern 283 #14,559
2003 modern 265 #15,025
2004 modern 271 #14,883
2005 modern 258 #15,323
2006 modern 259 #15,370
2007 modern 260 #15,476
2008 modern 258 #15,732
2009 modern 266 #15,711
2010 modern 280 #15,485
2011 modern 278 #15,390
2012 modern 274 #15,498
2013 modern 285 #15,313
2014 modern 283 #15,495
2015 modern 272 #15,851
2016 modern 261 #16,309

Geography

Back to top

Where Olliffes are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Stoke Mandeville, Great and Little Hampden, Hartwell, Stone, Acton, London parishes and St Mary Magdalen Bermondsey. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Gloucester, Perth Road, Sutton, Leicester and South Norfolk. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Stoke Mandeville, Great and Little Hampden, Hartwell, Stone Buckinghamshire
2 Acton Middlesex (Exclusive Of London Districts)
3 London parishes London 1
4 London parishes London 3
5 St Mary Magdalen Bermondsey London (South Districts)

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Gloucester 008 Gloucester
2 Perth Road Dundee City
3 Sutton 019 Sutton
4 Leicester 009 Leicester
5 South Norfolk 013 South Norfolk

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Olliffe

These lists show first names that appear often with the Olliffe surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Olliffe

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Olliffe, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Low-Skilled Migrant and Student Communities

Group

Established Multi-Ethnic Communities

Nationally, the Olliffe surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Established Multi-Ethnic Communities, within Low-Skilled Migrant and Student Communities. This does not mean every Olliffe household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Parents and young children in this Group are drawn from diverse ethnic backgrounds in broadly similar proportions. Employment is typically in elementary occupations, though workers in professional, intermediate or skilled trades occupations are also present. The residential landscape is dominated by terraced housing, although semi-detached houses and flats are also present. This Group is found in London and in many provincial towns and cities throughout the U.K.

Wider pattern

Young adults, many of whom are students, predominate in these high-density and overcrowded neighbourhoods of rented terrace houses or flats. Most ethnic minorities are present in these communities, as are people born in European countries that are not part of the EU. Students aside, low skilled occupations predominate, and unemployment rates are above average. Overall, the mix of students and more sedentary households means that neighbourhood average numbers of children are not very high. The Mixed or Multiple ethnic group composition of neighbourhoods is often associated with low rates of affiliation to Christian religions. This Supergroup predominates in non-central urban locations the UK, particularly within England in the Midlands and the outskirts of west, south and north-east London.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Young Families and Mainstream Employment

Group

Terraced and Semi-Detached Suburbs

Within London, Olliffe is most associated with areas classed as Terraced and Semi-Detached Suburbs, part of Young Families and Mainstream Employment. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Mainly concentrated in suburban areas, these terraced and semi-detached developments are less overcrowded than the Supergroup average, and resident households are more likely to own two or more cars. There are fewer residents aged 25-44, and a larger share of residents employed in administrative and secretarial occupations. Residents are more likely to have been born in the UK, less likely to have been born in the EU or Africa, and much less likely to self-identify as Bangladeshi.

Wider London pattern

Many families in these neighbourhoods have young children. Housing is principally in the social rented sector, in terraced or semi-detached units. While over-all residential densities are low, overcrowding is also prevalent locally. Residents are drawn from a range of ethnic minorities, with many identifying as Black and above average numbers born in Africa. Numbers identifying as of Chinese, Indian or White ethnicity are below average. Levels of proficiency in English are below average. Levels of separation or divorce and incidence of disability are both above average. Education is typically limited to Level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. Few residents work in professional or managerial occupations but the employment structure is otherwise diverse: it includes skilled trades, caring, leisure and other service occupations, sales and customer service occupations, construction, and work as process, plant, and machine operatives.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Olliffe is most concentrated in decile 6 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

6
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Olliffe falls in decile 10 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the less deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

10
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Olliffe is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 60-70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

9
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Olliffe, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Olliffe families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Olliffe surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Buckinghamshire leads with 52 Olliffes recorded in 1881 and an index of 68.36x.

County Total Index
Buckinghamshire 52 68.36x
Middlesex 27 2.15x
Surrey 25 4.08x
Bedfordshire 8 12.28x
Kent 5 1.16x
Essex 3 1.21x
Gloucestershire 2 0.81x
Suffolk 2 1.31x
Hampshire 1 0.39x
Lancashire 1 0.07x
Leicestershire 1 0.72x
Monmouthshire 1 1.10x
Yorkshire 1 0.08x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Aylesbury in Buckinghamshire leads with 24 Olliffes recorded in 1881 and an index of 712.17x.

Place Total Index
Aylesbury 24 712.17x
Stone 18 3050.85x
St George In East London 10 84.53x
Bermondsey 8 21.36x
Leighton Buzzard 8 285.71x
Lambeth 7 6.38x
Southwark St Saviour 7 108.19x
St George Hanover Square 7 31.57x
Acton 6 81.30x
Waddesdon 5 1388.89x
Chelsea London 4 10.55x
Hartwell 3 5000.00x
Lewisham 3 13.11x
West Ham 3 5.47x
Putney 2 34.90x
Ramsgate 2 28.53x
Abergavenny 1 29.33x
Aldershot 1 11.57x
Bury St Edmunds St James 1 24.45x
Cheltenham 1 5.25x
Chorlton On Medlock 1 4.22x
Ewell 1 77.52x
Gloucester St Mary Lode 1 172.41x
Ipswich St Nicholas 1 119.05x
Leicester St Mary 1 8.87x
Ovenden 1 18.02x
Upton Cum Chalvey 1 33.00x
Wycombe 1 17.64x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Olliffe surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Olliffe surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
George 8
William 7
John 6
Joseph 6
Thomas 5
Henry 4
James 4
Harry 3
Charles 2
Edward 2
Richard 2
Edwin 1
Eli 1
Frederick 1
Fredk. 1
Hamilton 1
Orris 1
Percival 1
Rob. 1
Robert 1
S.F. 1
Walter 1
Wm. 1

FAQ

Olliffe surname: questions and answers

How common was the Olliffe surname in 1881?

In 1881, 129 people were recorded with the Olliffe surname. That placed it at #17,013 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Olliffe surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 261 in 2016. That gives Olliffe a modern rank of #16,309.

What does the Olliffe map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Olliffe bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.