NameCensus.

UK surname

Paish

In the 1881 census there were 150 people recorded with the Paish surname, ranking it #15,489 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 201, ranked #19,525, down from #15,489 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Cerney, South, Lambeth and Cheltenham. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Cotswold, South Gloucestershire and Stroud.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Paish is 206 in 1999. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 34.0%.

1881 census count

150

Ranked #15,489

Modern count

201

2016, ranked #19,525

Peak year

1999

206 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Paish had 150 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #15,489 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 201 in 2016, ranked #19,525.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 201 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Rural Amenity.

Paish surname distribution map

The map shows where the Paish surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Paish surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Paish over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 133 #14,106
1861 historical 162 #14,310
1881 historical 150 #15,489
1891 historical 183 #15,918
1901 historical 188 #15,742
1911 historical 201 #14,905
1997 modern 186 #18,448
1998 modern 200 #18,114
1999 modern 206 #17,905
2000 modern 200 #18,209
2001 modern 196 #18,146
2002 modern 206 #17,966
2003 modern 191 #18,628
2004 modern 198 #18,308
2005 modern 198 #18,279
2006 modern 183 #19,326
2007 modern 185 #19,402
2008 modern 188 #19,387
2009 modern 179 #20,418
2010 modern 178 #20,965
2011 modern 182 #20,495
2012 modern 186 #20,141
2013 modern 202 #19,389
2014 modern 203 #19,504
2015 modern 202 #19,433
2016 modern 201 #19,525

Geography

Back to top

Where Paishs are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Cerney, South, Lambeth, Cheltenham, Sudeley Manor, Winchcombe, Prescott and Tetbury. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Cotswold, South Gloucestershire, Stroud and Stratford-on-Avon. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Cerney, South Gloucestershire
2 Lambeth London (South Districts)
3 Cheltenham Gloucestershire
4 Sudeley Manor, Winchcombe, Prescott Gloucestershire
5 Tetbury Gloucestershire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Cotswold 002 Cotswold
2 South Gloucestershire 024 South Gloucestershire
3 Stroud 015 Stroud
4 Stratford-on-Avon 015 Stratford-on-Avon
5 South Gloucestershire 007 South Gloucestershire

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Paish

These lists show first names that appear often with the Paish surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Paish

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Paish, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Rural Amenity

Nationally, the Paish surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Rural Amenity, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Paish household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group comprises older parents or retirees, with no resident dependent children, and with the lowest residential densities in this Supergroup. Predominantly UK-born, residents typically live in detached houses, although others do live in semi-detached and terraced properties. The level of multiple car ownership is the highest in this Supergroup. Most houses are owner occupied although social renting is also present. Many concentrations occur in high amenity rural locations, such as Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburban Asian Communities

Group

Young Asian Family Terraces

Within London, Paish is most associated with areas classed as Young Asian Family Terraces, part of Suburban Asian Communities. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These households with dependent children typically live in terraced housing and are of (non-Chinese) Asian extraction. Individuals with Bangladeshi origins are particularly in evidence. Employment is often in elementary occupations or as process, plant or machine operatives, and part-time work is common. Students are much in evidence.

Wider London pattern

Many residents of these neighbourhoods are of (non-Chinese) Asian descent, with many identifying as Indian, Pakistani or Bangladeshi. Neighbourhoods are located across large areas of suburban west, north-east and south London. Detached, semi-detached and terraced houses are more prevalent than flats and socially rented housing is uncommon. Few residents live in communal establishments. Many families have dependent children, sometimes in overcrowded accommodation, and few households are ethnically mixed. Marriage rates are above the London average. The even age distribution, relative absence of individuals living alone and frequent incidence of households with children suggests that multi-generation households may be relatively common. Employment is often in skilled trades, elementary, sales and customer service occupations, and roles as process, plant, and machine operatives. Manufacturing and construction are well represented, along with employment in distribution, hotels, and restaurants. Many adults have only level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. English is not used at home by some residents. Religious affiliation is above average.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Paish is most concentrated in decile 1 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the less healthy end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

1
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Paish falls in decile 7 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

7
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Paish is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 25-30 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

5
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Paish, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Paish families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Paish surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Gloucestershire leads with 72 Paishs recorded in 1881 and an index of 25.09x.

County Total Index
Gloucestershire 72 25.09x
Middlesex 33 2.26x
Surrey 10 1.40x
Wiltshire 10 7.73x
Berkshire 7 6.37x
Oxfordshire 7 7.75x
Worcestershire 3 1.57x
Essex 2 0.69x
Yorkshire 2 0.14x
Bedfordshire 1 1.32x
Hertfordshire 1 0.99x
Kent 1 0.20x
Leicestershire 1 0.62x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Cirencester in Gloucestershire leads with 13 Paishs recorded in 1881 and an index of 335.05x.

Place Total Index
Cirencester 13 335.05x
Lambeth 9 7.06x
South Cerney 9 1914.89x
Tetbury 8 490.80x
Eastington 7 736.84x
Winchcomb 7 492.96x
Hackney London 6 7.32x
Reading St Lawrence 6 255.32x
St George Hanover 6 31.41x
Stowell 6 20000.00x
Charlton Kings 5 251.26x
Cheltenham 5 22.58x
Hammersmith London 5 13.87x
Liddiard Millicent 5 1136.36x
Latton 4 3076.92x
Shoreditch London 4 6.31x
Bisley 3 115.38x
Fairford 3 389.61x
Fulham London 3 14.14x
Mile End Old Town 3 12.99x
St Pancras London 3 2.55x
Gt Tew 2 833.33x
Hampstead London 2 8.78x
Oxford St Ebbe 2 75.19x
Quenington 2 1052.63x
Taynton 2 1176.47x
West Ham 2 3.14x
Worcester St Martin 2 77.52x
Abingdon St Helen 1 31.15x
Bristol St James In 1 23.70x
Esher 1 100.00x
Gloucester Holy Trinity 1 400.00x
Greenwich 1 4.29x
Knighton 1 109.89x
Luton 1 7.63x
North Stainley Cum 1 476.19x
Purton 1 86.96x
St Albans 1 48.31x
St George Bloomsbury 1 11.92x
Stow On The Wold 1 156.25x
Tadcaster West 1 86.96x
Turkdean 1 666.67x
Witney 1 66.23x
Worcester St Peter 1 27.62x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Paish surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Paish surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 9
Charles 8
John 7
Thomas 6
Henry 5
James 5
George 4
Albert 3
Joseph 3
Robert 3
Fredrick 2
Richard 2
Alfred 1
Arthur 1
Chas.Jno.B. 1
Daniel 1
David 1
Ernest 1
Fred 1
Joshua 1
Louis 1
Mark 1
Mathew 1
Reuben 1
Samuel 1
Walter 1
Water 1

FAQ

Paish surname: questions and answers

How common was the Paish surname in 1881?

In 1881, 150 people were recorded with the Paish surname. That placed it at #15,489 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Paish surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 201 in 2016. That gives Paish a modern rank of #19,525.

What does the Paish map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Paish bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.