NameCensus.

UK surname

Pattern

In the 1881 census there were 72 people recorded with the Pattern surname, ranking it #23,371 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 84, ranked #32,726, down from #23,371 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Broadwater (incl. Worthing), Nuthurst, Newton and Hull Holy Trinity. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Pattern is 172 in 1891. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 16.7%.

1881 census count

72

Ranked #23,371

Modern count

84

2016, ranked #32,726

Peak year

1891

172 bearers

Map years

3

1861 to 1911

Key insights

  • Pattern had 72 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #23,371 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 84 in 2016, ranked #32,726.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 172 in 1891.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is No data.

Pattern surname distribution map

The map shows where the Pattern surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Pattern surname density by area, 1911 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Pattern over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 62 #22,232
1861 historical 163 #14,242
1881 historical 72 #23,371
1891 historical 172 #16,663
1901 historical 96 #23,342
1911 historical 171 #16,461
1997 modern 86 #28,876
1998 modern 95 #28,303
1999 modern 85 #29,578
2000 modern 81 #30,036
2001 modern 78 #30,168
2002 modern 78 #30,601
2003 modern 73 #31,186
2004 modern 77 #31,024
2005 modern 79 #30,950
2006 modern 78 #31,385
2007 modern 77 #31,856
2008 modern 77 #32,181
2009 modern 80 #32,277
2010 modern 86 #32,081
2011 modern 80 #32,652
2012 modern 81 #32,796
2013 modern 83 #32,813
2014 modern 85 #32,743
2015 modern 87 #32,514
2016 modern 84 #32,726

Geography

Back to top

Where Patterns are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Broadwater (incl. Worthing), Nuthurst, Newton, Hull Holy Trinity, King's Lynn St Margaret and St Pancras. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Broadwater (incl. Worthing), Nuthurst Sussex
2 Newton Cambridgeshire
3 Hull Holy Trinity Yorkshire, East Riding
4 King's Lynn St Margaret Norfolk
5 St Pancras London (North Districts)

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 No data No data

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Pattern

These lists show first names that appear often with the Pattern surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Pattern

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Pattern, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Nationally, the Pattern surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Pattern household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Within London, Pattern is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Pattern is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Pattern, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Pattern families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Pattern surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Middlesex leads with 29 Patterns recorded in 1881 and an index of 4.07x.

County Total Index
Middlesex 29 4.07x
Lincolnshire 7 6.15x
Norfolk 7 6.39x
Yorkshire 6 0.85x
Sussex 5 4.17x
Cambridgeshire 4 8.87x
Lancashire 4 0.47x
Huntingdonshire 3 21.22x
Surrey 3 0.86x
Essex 2 1.42x
Kent 1 0.41x
Royal Navy 1 11.79x
Staffordshire 1 0.42x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. St Pancras London in Middlesex leads with 14 Patterns recorded in 1881 and an index of 24.43x.

Place Total Index
St Pancras London 14 24.43x
Bethnal Green London 11 35.56x
Walpole St Andrew 6 3529.41x
Holy Trinity 5 29.46x
Woolbeding 5 5555.56x
Tydd St Giles 4 1904.76x
Fletton 3 666.67x
Holbeach 3 236.22x
Oldham 3 11.00x
Shoreditch London 3 9.72x
Camberwell 2 4.40x
Colchester St Botolph 2 166.67x
Whaplode 2 512.82x
Barrow In Furness 1 8.70x
Burton Upon Trent 1 17.79x
Chelsea London 1 4.66x
Croydon 1 5.19x
Fleet 1 312.50x
Gainsborough 1 37.31x
Horton In Bradford 1 9.07x
Lyminge 1 476.19x
Walpole St Peter 1 357.14x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Pattern surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 8
Sarah 4
Emma 2
Esther 2
Winifred 2
Adele 1
Amelia 1
Anie 1
Anne 1
Annie 1
Bertha 1
Caroline 1
Catherine 1
Charity 1
Charlotte 1
Eleanor 1
Eliza 1
Elizabeth 1
Ellen 1
Ethel 1
Georgina 1
Harriet 1
Harriett 1
Jane 1
Laura 1
Marey 1
Margaret 1
Margueretta 1
Ruth 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Pattern surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 4
William 3
Alfred 2
Frank 2
Frederick 2
James 2
Joseph 2
Michael 2
Robert 2
Wm. 2
Adolphus 1
Albert 1
Charly 1
Egbert 1
Miles 1
Thomas 1
Walter 1

FAQ

Pattern surname: questions and answers

How common was the Pattern surname in 1881?

In 1881, 72 people were recorded with the Pattern surname. That placed it at #23,371 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Pattern surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 84 in 2016. That gives Pattern a modern rank of #32,726.

What does the Pattern map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Pattern bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.