NameCensus.

UK surname

Preist

In the 1881 census there were 62 people recorded with the Preist surname, ranking it #24,843 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 27, ranked #36,189, down from #24,843 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Bristol City: St Mary Redcliff, Newland (Bream, Clearwell, Newland, Coleford), West Dean and Wandsworth. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Preist is 146 in 1851. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 56.5%.

1881 census count

62

Ranked #24,843

Modern count

27

2016, ranked #36,189

Peak year

1851

146 bearers

Map years

3

1851 to 1891

Key insights

  • Preist had 62 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #24,843 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 27 in 2016, ranked #36,189.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 146 in 1851.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is No data.

Preist surname distribution map

The map shows where the Preist surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Preist surname density by area, 1891 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Preist over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 146 #13,157
1861 historical 118 #18,512
1881 historical 62 #24,843
1891 historical 113 #22,162
1901 historical 48 #28,808
1911 historical 85 #24,322
1997 modern 30 #34,701
1998 modern 29 #34,948
1999 modern 31 #34,821
2000 modern 29 #34,976
2001 modern 28 #34,936
2002 modern 30 #34,950
2003 modern 36 #34,522
2004 modern 38 #34,555
2005 modern 35 #34,982
2006 modern 29 #35,605
2007 modern 30 #35,661
2008 modern 31 #35,670
2009 modern 31 #35,794
2010 modern 30 #35,967
2011 modern 25 #36,252
2012 modern 26 #36,166
2013 modern 22 #36,477
2014 modern 24 #36,358
2015 modern 26 #36,228
2016 modern 27 #36,189

Geography

Back to top

Where Preists are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Bristol City: St Mary Redcliff, Newland (Bream, Clearwell, Newland, Coleford), West Dean, Wandsworth, London parishes and Brighton. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Bristol City: St Mary Redcliff Gloucestershire
2 Newland (Bream, Clearwell, Newland, Coleford), West Dean Monmouthshire
3 Wandsworth London (South Districts)
4 London parishes London 3
5 Brighton Sussex

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 No data No data

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Preist

These lists show first names that appear often with the Preist surname in historical and recent records.

Recent female names

No Forenames Found

Recent male names

No Forenames Found

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Preist

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Preist, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Nationally, the Preist surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Preist household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Within London, Preist is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Preist is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Preist, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Preist families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Preist surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Middlesex leads with 10 Preists recorded in 1881 and an index of 1.65x.

County Total Index
Middlesex 10 1.65x
Surrey 8 2.72x
Somerset 7 7.19x
Lancashire 6 0.84x
Staffordshire 6 2.94x
Nottinghamshire 5 6.13x
Warwickshire 5 3.28x
Gloucestershire 4 3.37x
Buckinghamshire 3 8.21x
Worcestershire 3 3.80x
Devon 2 1.59x
Hertfordshire 1 2.40x
Kincardineshire 1 13.59x
Shropshire 1 1.91x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Wandsworth in Surrey leads with 8 Preists recorded in 1881 and an index of 137.46x.

Place Total Index
Wandsworth 8 137.46x
Bedminster 7 76.50x
Kensington London 6 17.85x
Bolehall Glascote 4 615.38x
Bristol St Philip Jacob 4 35.81x
Salford 4 18.96x
Bulwell 3 169.49x
Sunbury 3 410.96x
Tettenhall 3 240.00x
Hallow 2 512.82x
Kingswinford 2 26.99x
Newark Upon Trent 2 68.26x
Olney 2 392.16x
Tormoham 2 37.52x
Birmingham 1 1.97x
Dudley 1 10.42x
Kings Langley 1 333.33x
Marton 1 208.33x
Nigg 1 163.93x
Pontesbury 1 156.25x
Preston 1 5.21x
Rushton Spencer 1 1428.57x
St Pancras London 1 2.05x
Wycombe 1 36.63x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Preist surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Eliza 3
Elizabeth 3
Ellen 3
Edith 2
Louisa 2
Agnes 1
Alice 1
Annie 1
Caroline 1
Catherine 1
Charlotte 1
Elizebeth 1
Elizth. 1
Florence 1
Frances 1
Jane 1
Kate 1
Lottie 1
Margaret 1
Mary 1
Matilda 1
Patienc 1
Rebecca 1
Rose 1
Salome 1
Sarah 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Preist surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top occupations

Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in Preist households.

FAQ

Preist surname: questions and answers

How common was the Preist surname in 1881?

In 1881, 62 people were recorded with the Preist surname. That placed it at #24,843 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Preist surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 27 in 2016. That gives Preist a modern rank of #36,189.

What does the Preist map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Preist bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.