NameCensus.

UK surname

Pretlove

In the 1881 census there were 74 people recorded with the Pretlove surname, ranking it #23,062 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 203, ranked #19,396, up from #23,062 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Edmonton, Bristol City: St Mary Redcliff and London parishes. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Westminster, Ipswich and Arun.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Pretlove is 221 in 2000. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 174.3%.

1881 census count

74

Ranked #23,062

Modern count

203

2016, ranked #19,396

Peak year

2000

221 bearers

Map years

6

1891 to 2016

Key insights

  • Pretlove had 74 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #23,062 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 203 in 2016, ranked #19,396.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 152 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Challenged Communities.

Pretlove surname distribution map

The map shows where the Pretlove surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Pretlove surname density by area, 2016 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Pretlove over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 38 #26,502
1861 historical 29 #30,287
1881 historical 74 #23,062
1891 historical 105 #23,241
1901 historical 131 #19,552
1911 historical 152 #17,712
1997 modern 204 #17,409
1998 modern 217 #17,207
1999 modern 213 #17,550
2000 modern 221 #17,089
2001 modern 217 #17,059
2002 modern 221 #17,206
2003 modern 215 #17,286
2004 modern 217 #17,276
2005 modern 217 #17,217
2006 modern 208 #17,835
2007 modern 216 #17,575
2008 modern 205 #18,359
2009 modern 219 #17,960
2010 modern 218 #18,375
2011 modern 221 #18,039
2012 modern 213 #18,422
2013 modern 211 #18,872
2014 modern 208 #19,194
2015 modern 211 #18,906
2016 modern 203 #19,396

Geography

Back to top

Where Pretloves are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Edmonton, Bristol City: St Mary Redcliff, London parishes and St Marylebone. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Westminster, Ipswich, Arun, Swindon and West Berkshire. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Edmonton Middlesex (Exclusive Of London Districts)
2 Bristol City: St Mary Redcliff Gloucestershire
3 London parishes London 1
4 London parishes London 3
5 St Marylebone London (North Districts)

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Westminster 001 Westminster
2 Ipswich 001 Ipswich
3 Arun 004 Arun
4 Swindon 012 Swindon
5 West Berkshire 009 West Berkshire

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Pretlove

These lists show first names that appear often with the Pretlove surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Pretlove

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Pretlove, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Baseline UK

Group

Challenged Communities

Nationally, the Pretlove surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Challenged Communities, within Baseline UK. This does not mean every Pretlove household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Residents of these neighbourhoods typically live in households with dependent children, and there are fewer-than-average residents of normal retirement age or over. Identification with ethnic minorities, particularly Black, or Mixed or Multiple ethnicities is common. The rate of Christian religious affiliation is low. Housing predominantly consists of semi-detached houses, along with a significant number of terraced properties and flats. Overcrowded social housing is common, and private renting occurs at average UK levels. Those in employment work mainly in caring leisure and other services; process, plant and machine operation; or elementary occupations. Unemployment is high, and few individuals have degree level qualifications. Many of these neighbourhoods occur in commuter towns or less accessible areas of larger towns and cities.

Wider pattern

This Supergroup exemplifies the broad base to the UK’s social structure, encompassing as it does the average or modal levels of many neighbourhood characteristics, including all housing tenures, a range of levels of educational attainment and religious affiliations, and a variety of pre-retirement age structures. Yet, in combination, these mixes are each distinctive of the parts of the UK. Overall, terraced houses and flats are the most prevalent, as is employment in intermediate or low-skilled occupations. However, this Supergroup is also characterised by above average levels of unemployment and lower levels of use of English as the main language. Many neighbourhoods occur in south London and the UK’s other major urban centres.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Social Rented Sector Families with Children

Group

Social Rented Sector Pockets

Within London, Pretlove is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector Pockets, part of Social Rented Sector Families with Children. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Found in pockets across London, residents are less likely to live in private sector rentals and fewer adults are students. Fewer individuals work in transport and communications occupations relative to the Supergroup average. More individuals identify as Black and were born in Africa.

Wider London pattern

Residents of these neighbourhoods include sizable numbers identifying with ethnicities originating outside Europe, particularly in Africa or Bangladesh. The proportion of residents identifying as White, Indian or Pakistani is well below the London average. Neighbourhood age profiles are skewed towards younger adults, and above average numbers of families have children. Rates of use of English at home are below average. Marriage rates are low, and levels of separation or divorce are above average. Housing is predominantly in flats, and renting in the social rented sector the norm - few residents are owner occupiers. Housing is often overcrowded, and neighbourhoods are amongst the most densely populated in London. Disability rates are above average, although levels of unpaid care provision are about average. Employment is in caring, leisure, other service occupations, sales and customer service, or process, plant, and machine operation. Part time working and full-time student study are common. Levels of unemployment are slightly above average. Most residents have only Level 1 or 2 educational qualifications or have completed apprenticeships.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Pretlove is most concentrated in decile 10 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

10
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Pretlove falls in decile 1 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

1
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Pretlove is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 60-70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

9
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Pretlove, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Pretlove families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Pretlove surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Middlesex leads with 45 Pretloves recorded in 1881 and an index of 6.24x.

County Total Index
Middlesex 45 6.24x
Essex 11 7.72x
Surrey 8 2.28x
Gloucestershire 4 2.83x
Warwickshire 3 1.65x
Somerset 2 1.72x
Lincolnshire 1 0.87x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Islington London in Middlesex leads with 23 Pretloves recorded in 1881 and an index of 32.89x.

Place Total Index
Islington London 23 32.89x
Edmonton 10 172.12x
Newington 8 30.01x
St Marylebone London 7 18.17x
Barking 5 119.90x
Hanwell 5 390.63x
Bristol St Mary Redcliff 4 310.08x
Walthamstow 4 77.97x
Birmingham 3 4.95x
Bedminster 2 18.33x
Loughton 2 285.71x
Great Grimsby 1 13.66x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Pretlove surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Jane 5
Emily 3
Mary 3
Eliza 2
Florence 2
Ada 1
Allice 1
Ann 1
Annie 1
B.J. 1
Betsy 1
Caroline 1
Edith 1
Elizabeth 1
Ellen 1
H. 1
Hannah 1
Kattie 1
L.J. 1
Lucy 1
Margaret 1
Martha 1
Rose 1
Sarah 1
Susan 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Pretlove surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Charles 4
Herbert 3
James 3
John 3
Samuel 3
William 3
George 2
Joseph 2
Richard 2
Robert 2
Albert 1
Alfred 1
Arthur 1
Edward 1
F.W.G. 1
Frank 1
Frederick 1
Fredrick 1
Harry 1
Henry 1
Thomas 1
Wm. 1

Top occupations

Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in Pretlove households.

FAQ

Pretlove surname: questions and answers

How common was the Pretlove surname in 1881?

In 1881, 74 people were recorded with the Pretlove surname. That placed it at #23,062 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Pretlove surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 203 in 2016. That gives Pretlove a modern rank of #19,396.

What does the Pretlove map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Pretlove bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.