NameCensus.

UK surname

Reeman

In the 1881 census there were 193 people recorded with the Reeman surname, ranking it #13,144 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 192, ranked #20,118, down from #13,144 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Stanningfield, Welnethan, Great and Bradford. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Torbay, East Devon and St Edmundsbury.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Reeman is 260 in 1901. Compared with 1881, the name has stayed broadly stable by 0.5%.

1881 census count

193

Ranked #13,144

Modern count

192

2016, ranked #20,118

Peak year

1901

260 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Reeman had 193 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #13,144 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 192 in 2016, ranked #20,118.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 260 in 1901.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Ageing Communities.

Reeman surname distribution map

The map shows where the Reeman surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Reeman surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Reeman over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 109 #16,212
1861 historical 123 #17,914
1881 historical 193 #13,144
1891 historical 217 #14,062
1901 historical 260 #12,817
1911 historical 251 #12,870
1997 modern 225 #16,352
1998 modern 247 #15,813
1999 modern 232 #16,594
2000 modern 230 #16,644
2001 modern 235 #16,147
2002 modern 232 #16,637
2003 modern 224 #16,859
2004 modern 211 #17,590
2005 modern 203 #17,961
2006 modern 208 #17,835
2007 modern 205 #18,194
2008 modern 214 #17,854
2009 modern 212 #18,328
2010 modern 207 #19,007
2011 modern 194 #19,662
2012 modern 183 #20,356
2013 modern 187 #20,436
2014 modern 191 #20,302
2015 modern 189 #20,345
2016 modern 192 #20,118

Geography

Back to top

Where Reemans are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Stanningfield, Welnethan, Great, Bradford, Alpheton and London parishes. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Torbay, East Devon, St Edmundsbury and Wigan. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Stanningfield Suffolk
2 Welnethan, Great Suffolk
3 Bradford Yorkshire, West Riding
4 Alpheton Suffolk
5 London parishes London 2

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Torbay 017 Torbay
2 Torbay 018 Torbay
3 East Devon 010 East Devon
4 St Edmundsbury 007 St Edmundsbury
5 Wigan 006 Wigan

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Reeman

These lists show first names that appear often with the Reeman surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Reeman

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Reeman, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Ageing Communities

Nationally, the Reeman surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Ageing Communities, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Reeman household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Many residents are of normal retirement age or above and live in communal establishments, and there are few dependent children. The dominant property type is a mix of retirement flats and detached houses. Those in work are likely to be employed in managerial and professional occupations, and many residents are educated to degree level. Levels of owner occupation are high, but the private rental sector is also present. Rural locations predominate.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Young Families and Mainstream Employment

Group

Social Rented Sector and Diverse Origins

Within London, Reeman is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector and Diverse Origins, part of Young Families and Mainstream Employment. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Scattered across London’s Inner and Outer suburbs, residents of these neighbourhoods are typically housed in the social rented sector. Although terraced and semi-detached houses predominate, more residents live in flats than elsewhere in the Supergroup. Neighbourhoods are more ethnically diverse than the Supergroup average. Those identifying as of Bangladeshi, Pakistani and some Black ethnicities are more prevalent. Europeans born in a overseas non-EU countries make up more of the lower proportion of residents identifying as White. Few residents are very old (85+). Employment in distribution, hotels and restaurants is more common than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

Many families in these neighbourhoods have young children. Housing is principally in the social rented sector, in terraced or semi-detached units. While over-all residential densities are low, overcrowding is also prevalent locally. Residents are drawn from a range of ethnic minorities, with many identifying as Black and above average numbers born in Africa. Numbers identifying as of Chinese, Indian or White ethnicity are below average. Levels of proficiency in English are below average. Levels of separation or divorce and incidence of disability are both above average. Education is typically limited to Level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. Few residents work in professional or managerial occupations but the employment structure is otherwise diverse: it includes skilled trades, caring, leisure and other service occupations, sales and customer service occupations, construction, and work as process, plant, and machine operatives.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Reeman is most concentrated in decile 7 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

7
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Reeman falls in decile 6 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

6
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Reeman is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Reeman, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Reeman families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Reeman surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Suffolk leads with 81 Reemans recorded in 1881 and an index of 35.51x.

County Total Index
Suffolk 81 35.51x
Middlesex 32 1.71x
Essex 25 6.76x
Yorkshire 15 0.81x
Cambridgeshire 9 7.59x
Midlothian 8 3.19x
Norfolk 6 2.08x
Durham 5 0.90x
Surrey 5 0.55x
Lancashire 2 0.09x
Northumberland 2 0.72x
Kent 1 0.16x
Staffordshire 1 0.16x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Lawshall in Suffolk leads with 16 Reemans recorded in 1881 and an index of 3137.25x.

Place Total Index
Lawshall 16 3137.25x
Bradford 12 26.71x
Alpheton 10 6250.00x
Lowestoft 10 92.76x
Woolpit 10 1515.15x
Kirtling 9 1698.11x
Bulphan 8 4444.44x
Fulham London 8 29.46x
South Leith 8 28.34x
Great Finborough 7 2692.31x
Hackney London 7 6.67x
Langdon Hills 7 3888.89x
Beechamwell 6 3000.00x
Long Melford 6 283.02x
West Ham 6 7.35x
Bow London 5 20.97x
Hammersmith London 5 10.84x
Darlington 4 18.60x
Norton 4 833.33x
Stratford St Mary 4 1212.12x
Streatham 4 28.78x
Bury St Edmunds St Mary 3 70.09x
Great Welnetham 3 1071.43x
Hampstead London 3 10.28x
Shepley 3 294.12x
Bury St Edmunds St James 2 32.84x
Dedham 2 178.57x
Great Cornard 2 384.62x
Rothbury 2 250.00x
Bexley 1 17.70x
Brent Eleigh 1 666.67x
Carlton Colville 1 119.05x
Chorlton On Medlock 1 2.83x
Drinkstone 1 333.33x
East Horndon 1 312.50x
Gateshead 1 2.40x
Ipswich St Helen 1 37.04x
Islington London 1 0.55x
Kingswinford 1 4.36x
Manchester 1 1.00x
Newington 1 1.45x
Springfield 1 61.73x
St George Hanover 1 4.09x
St Mary Le Strand 1 166.67x
St Marylebone London 1 1.00x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Reeman surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Reeman surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 17
Robert 9
Frederick 6
George 6
Alfred 5
Charles 4
Albert 3
Arthur 3
Henry 3
James 3
John 3
Ambrose 2
Edward 2
Ernest 2
Herbert 2
Joseph 2
Philip 2
Elizah 1
Frank 1
Frederic 1
Fredrick 1
Geo. 1
Harry 1
Harvey 1
Lional 1
Mark 1
Mary 1
Matthew 1
Peter 1
Richard 1
Samuel 1
Sidney 1
Simon 1
Thomas 1
Thos.E. 1
W.John 1

FAQ

Reeman surname: questions and answers

How common was the Reeman surname in 1881?

In 1881, 193 people were recorded with the Reeman surname. That placed it at #13,144 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Reeman surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 192 in 2016. That gives Reeman a modern rank of #20,118.

What does the Reeman map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Reeman bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.