NameCensus.

UK surname

Rugman

In the 1881 census there were 214 people recorded with the Rugman surname, ranking it #12,284 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 301, ranked #14,696, down from #12,284 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Bristol City: St Mary Redcliff, Alveston and St James Clerkenwell. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include South Gloucestershire and North Somerset.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Rugman is 331 in 1999. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 40.7%.

1881 census count

214

Ranked #12,284

Modern count

301

2016, ranked #14,696

Peak year

1999

331 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Rugman had 214 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #12,284 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 301 in 2016, ranked #14,696.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 325 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Spacious Rural Living.

Rugman surname distribution map

The map shows where the Rugman surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Rugman surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Rugman over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 118 #15,362
1861 historical 108 #19,856
1881 historical 214 #12,284
1891 historical 223 #13,800
1901 historical 263 #12,717
1911 historical 325 #10,783
1997 modern 308 #13,297
1998 modern 325 #13,166
1999 modern 331 #13,106
2000 modern 304 #13,791
2001 modern 312 #13,392
2002 modern 312 #13,639
2003 modern 307 #13,614
2004 modern 310 #13,589
2005 modern 303 #13,757
2006 modern 292 #14,148
2007 modern 297 #14,135
2008 modern 292 #14,403
2009 modern 299 #14,445
2010 modern 294 #14,940
2011 modern 299 #14,631
2012 modern 307 #14,288
2013 modern 313 #14,299
2014 modern 307 #14,608
2015 modern 302 #14,687
2016 modern 301 #14,696

Geography

Back to top

Where Rugmans are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Bristol City: St Mary Redcliff, Alveston, St James Clerkenwell, Thornbury, Rockhampton and Tidenham (incl. Lancaut). These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to South Gloucestershire and North Somerset. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Bristol City: St Mary Redcliff Gloucestershire
2 Alveston Gloucestershire
3 St James Clerkenwell London (Central Districts)
4 Thornbury, Rockhampton Gloucestershire
5 Tidenham (incl. Lancaut) Monmouthshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 South Gloucestershire 004 South Gloucestershire
2 South Gloucestershire 002 South Gloucestershire
3 North Somerset 004 North Somerset
4 South Gloucestershire 011 South Gloucestershire
5 South Gloucestershire 001 South Gloucestershire

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Rugman

These lists show first names that appear often with the Rugman surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Rugman

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Rugman, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Retired Professionals

Group

Spacious Rural Living

Nationally, the Rugman surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Spacious Rural Living, within Retired Professionals. This does not mean every Rugman household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These predominantly ageing households typically have no resident dependent children. Most are owner-occupiers and live in detached houses in low density residential developments (although renting is more common than in the rest of the Supergroup). White ethnicity predominates. Residents are typically beyond retirement age but those still in work have managerial, professional or skilled trade occupations. White ethnicity and Christian religious affiliation predominate. Neighbourhoods are located throughout rural UK.

Wider pattern

Typically married but no longer with resident dependent children, these well-educated households either remain working in their managerial, professional, administrative or other skilled occupations, or are retired from them – the modal individual age is beyond normal retirement age. Underoccupied detached and semi-detached properties predominate, and unpaid care is more prevalent than reported disability. The prevalence of this Supergroup outside most urban conurbations indicates that rural lifestyles prevail, typically sustained by using two or more cars per household.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Professional Employment and Family Lifecycles

Group

Inner London Working Professionals

Within London, Rugman is most associated with areas classed as Inner London Working Professionals, part of Professional Employment and Family Lifecycles. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These primarily Inner London neighbourhoods are more densely populated than the Supergroup average. Residents have a younger over-all age profile than the Supergroup as a whole, and are less likely to be owner occupiers. Full time employment is more common than elsewhere in the Supergroup and multiple car ownership is uncommon. Chinese and non-EU-born European migrants are less in evidence than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

These neighbourhoods house people of all ages, predominantly of White British or European extraction. Resident turnover is low. Religious affiliation is less common than average and tends to be Christian if expressed. Homeownership, typically of terraced houses, is common but use of the social rented sector is not. Employment is typically in professional, managerial and associate professional or technical occupations. There are few full-time students. Level 4 qualifications are common. More households lack dependent children than have them which, considered alongside low levels of crowding and over-all age structure, indicates that many households may be post child-rearing and in late middle age. Incidence of disability is low, as is residence in communal establishments.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Rugman is most concentrated in decile 5 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

5
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Rugman falls in decile 7 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

7
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Rugman is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 60-70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

9
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Rugman, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Rugman families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Rugman surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Gloucestershire leads with 120 Rugmans recorded in 1881 and an index of 29.31x.

County Total Index
Gloucestershire 120 29.31x
Surrey 25 2.46x
Sussex 23 6.54x
Middlesex 20 0.96x
Monmouthshire 9 5.96x
Somerset 9 2.68x
Flintshire 4 7.13x
Cheshire 3 0.65x
Devon 1 0.23x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Thornbury in Gloucestershire leads with 58 Rugmans recorded in 1881 and an index of 2071.43x.

Place Total Index
Thornbury 58 2071.43x
Alveston 18 3103.45x
Islington London 11 5.44x
Tytherington 10 3125.00x
Kirdford 9 737.70x
Tidenham Beachley 9 2045.45x
Clevedon 8 229.23x
Wisborough Green 8 677.97x
Clerkenwell London 7 14.21x
St Woollos 7 41.57x
Wickwar 7 1060.61x
Banstead 6 217.39x
Wonersh 5 393.70x
Bristol St James St Paul 4 29.30x
Dorking 4 58.57x
Hawarden 4 90.70x
Almondsbury 3 192.31x
Dunsfold 3 545.45x
Great Neston 3 197.37x
Patcham 3 476.19x
Bramley 2 222.22x
Cheltenham 2 6.33x
Kingston On Thames 2 8.19x
Lewes St John Under 2 416.67x
Littleton On Severn 2 1428.57x
Lydney 2 94.79x
Olveston 2 173.91x
Alfold 1 256.41x
Bristol St Paul In 1 9.17x
Caerwent 1 344.83x
Cranleigh 1 67.11x
Godalming 1 15.63x
Horsham 1 14.62x
Monmouth 1 25.00x
Northam 1 31.55x
Rockhampton 1 625.00x
St Marylebone London 1 0.90x
St Pancras London 1 0.60x
Wedmore 1 45.66x
Westbury On Trym 1 7.21x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Rugman surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 14
Sarah 10
Elizabeth 9
Alice 6
Emily 6
Emma 6
Eliza 5
Ann 4
Caroline 3
Charlotte 3
Fanny 3
Annie 2
Edith 2
Esther 2
Florence 2
Louisa 2
Agnes 1
Amelia 1
Catherine 1
Celia 1
Clara 1
Elenor 1
Ella 1
Ellen 1
Harriet 1
Harriett 1
Hester 1
Ida 1
Jane 1
Kezia 1
Lousa 1
Maray 1
Margaret 1
Maria 1
Martha 1
Matilda 1
Maud 1
Minnie 1
Pamila 1
Pheobe 1
Priscilla 1
Susan 1
Theresa 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Rugman surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 16
John 10
George 8
Thomas 8
Charles 7
Albert 5
Samuel 5
Henry 4
James 4
Robert 4
Job 3
Arthur 2
Edwin 2
Ernest 2
Frederick 2
Joseph 2
Maurice 2
Richard 2
Alfred 1
Cornelius 1
David 1
Edgar 1
Edward 1
Frank 1
Fred 1
Fredrick 1
Geo. 1
Guy 1
Harry 1
Herbert 1
Jacob 1
Mapson 1
Mark 1
Renel 1
Thos. 1
Tom 1
Willie 1
Willm. 1

FAQ

Rugman surname: questions and answers

How common was the Rugman surname in 1881?

In 1881, 214 people were recorded with the Rugman surname. That placed it at #12,284 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Rugman surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 301 in 2016. That gives Rugman a modern rank of #14,696.

What does the Rugman map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Rugman bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.