NameCensus.

UK surname

Scorer

In the 1881 census there were 413 people recorded with the Scorer surname, ranking it #7,794 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 940, ranked #6,094, up from #7,794 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside, Houghton-le-Spring (West Rainton), Pittington (Pittington) and Gateshead. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Doncaster, Wrexham and Newcastle upon Tyne.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Scorer is 1,004 in 1999. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 127.6%.

1881 census count

413

Ranked #7,794

Modern count

940

2016, ranked #6,094

Peak year

1999

1,004 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Scorer had 413 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #7,794 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 940 in 2016, ranked #6,094.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 714 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Established but Challenged.

Scorer surname distribution map

The map shows where the Scorer surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Scorer surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Scorer over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 233 #9,272
1861 historical 231 #10,572
1881 historical 413 #7,794
1891 historical 496 #7,478
1901 historical 611 #6,972
1911 historical 714 #5,980
1997 modern 950 #5,722
1998 modern 985 #5,742
1999 modern 1,004 #5,697
2000 modern 963 #5,866
2001 modern 943 #5,857
2002 modern 959 #5,876
2003 modern 920 #5,978
2004 modern 912 #6,031
2005 modern 916 #5,944
2006 modern 907 #6,010
2007 modern 919 #5,996
2008 modern 926 #6,005
2009 modern 951 #5,994
2010 modern 988 #5,929
2011 modern 973 #5,939
2012 modern 965 #5,900
2013 modern 985 #5,896
2014 modern 978 #5,963
2015 modern 946 #6,086
2016 modern 940 #6,094

Geography

Back to top

Where Scorers are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside, Houghton-le-Spring (West Rainton), Pittington (Pittington), Gateshead, Monkwearmouth and Tynemouth (Chirton, Preston, Murton, Whitley, Monkseaton), Earsdon (Earsdon). These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Doncaster, Wrexham, Newcastle upon Tyne, Sunderland and County Durham. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside Durham
2 Houghton-le-Spring (West Rainton), Pittington (Pittington) Durham
3 Gateshead Durham
4 Monkwearmouth Durham
5 Tynemouth (Chirton, Preston, Murton, Whitley, Monkseaton), Earsdon (Earsdon) Northumberland

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Doncaster 004 Doncaster
2 Wrexham 018 Wrexham
3 Newcastle upon Tyne 003 Newcastle upon Tyne
4 Sunderland 035 Sunderland
5 County Durham 001 County Durham

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Scorer

These lists show first names that appear often with the Scorer surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Scorer

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Scorer, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce

Group

Established but Challenged

Nationally, the Scorer surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Established but Challenged, within Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce. This does not mean every Scorer household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Many households in these neighbourhoods comprise separated or divorced single parents with dependent children. Residents are typically born in the UK, and these neighbourhoods have relatively few members of ethnic minorities. The prevalence of children, their parents and those at or above normal retirement age, suggests neighbourhood structures may be long-established. Levels of unpaid care are high, and long-term disability is more common than in the Supergroup as a whole. Use of the social rented sector is common, often in terraced houses. Levels of overcrowding are above the Supergroup average. Unemployment is high, while those in work are employed in elementary occupations such as caring, leisure and customer services. Many residents have low level qualifications. Neighbourhood concentrations of this Group are found in the South Wales Valleys, Belfast, Londonderry and the Central Lowlands of Scotland.

Wider pattern

Living in terraced or semi-detached houses, residents of these neighbourhoods typically lack high levels of education and work in elementary or routine service occupations. Unemployment is above average. Residents are predominantly born in the UK, and residents are also predominantly from ethnic minorities. Social (but not private sector) rented sector housing is common. This Supergroup is found throughout the UK’s conurbations and industrial regions but is also an integral part of smaller towns.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

The Greater London Mix

Group

Social Rented Sector Professional Support Workers

Within London, Scorer is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector Professional Support Workers, part of The Greater London Mix. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Mainly located in Inner London, these neighbourhoods retain a diverse employment structure, with some concentration in associated professional and technical occupations rather than skilled trades or construction. Social renting is more common and levels of homeownership are low. Many residents identify as Black. There is a lower than average rate of marriage or civil partnership, few that are very old (85 or over) and higher than average incidence of disability.

Wider London pattern

A Supergroup embodying London's diversity in many respects, apart from low numbers of residents identifying as of Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani or Other (non-Chinese) Asian ethnicity. There is lower than average prevalence of families with dependent children, while there are above average occurrences of never-married individuals and single-person households. The age distribution is skewed towards younger, single residents and couples without children, with many individuals identifying as of mixed or multiple ethnicity. Social rented or private rented housing is slightly more prevalent than average, and many residents live in flats. Individuals typically work in professional and associated roles in public administration, education or health rather than in elementary occupations in agriculture, energy, water, construction or manufacturing. Incidence of students is slightly below average. Individuals declaring no religion are more prevalent than average and non-use of English at home is below average.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Scorer is most concentrated in decile 8 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

8
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Scorer falls in decile 4 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

4
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Scorer is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Scorer, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Scorer families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Scorer surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Durham leads with 228 Scorers recorded in 1881 and an index of 19.02x.

County Total Index
Durham 228 19.02x
Northumberland 80 13.35x
Yorkshire 26 0.65x
Lincolnshire 15 2.33x
Lancashire 11 0.23x
Middlesex 11 0.27x
Surrey 11 0.56x
Derbyshire 7 1.11x
Hampshire 7 0.85x
Bedfordshire 6 2.88x
Westmorland 5 5.65x
Cambridgeshire 3 1.18x
Devon 1 0.12x
Kent 1 0.07x
Nottinghamshire 1 0.18x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. West Rainton in Durham leads with 26 Scorers recorded in 1881 and an index of 700.81x.

Place Total Index
West Rainton 26 700.81x
Monkwearmouth Shore 16 68.41x
Newcastle On Tyne St 16 51.50x
Wallsend 16 84.17x
Willington 16 230.88x
Gateshead 13 14.49x
Hetton Le Hole 13 85.58x
Westgate 12 32.33x
Harton 11 232.07x
Houghton Le Spring 11 132.69x
Sherburn 11 301.37x
Great Lumley 9 439.02x
Middlesbrough 9 17.31x
Elvet 8 92.49x
Bishopwearmouth 7 6.80x
Byker 7 23.62x
Hartlepool 7 41.10x
Tanfield 7 49.12x
Usworth 7 110.06x
Warblington 7 213.41x
Cornsay 6 185.76x
Longbenton 6 23.63x
Melchbourne 6 2000.00x
Newbottle 6 91.74x
St Peterin Eastgate 6 301.51x
Burwell 5 2272.73x
Codnor Park 5 337.84x
Elswick 5 10.45x
Framwellgate 5 70.42x
Newsham 5 1315.79x
Pelton 5 87.72x
St Marylebone London 5 2.32x
Thornley 5 115.21x
Undermilbeck 5 171.23x
Winlaton 5 43.48x
Haswell 4 46.57x
Lambeth 4 1.14x
Little Lumley 4 563.38x
Middleham 4 353.98x
Moston 4 83.51x
North Shields 4 33.44x
Openshaw 4 17.87x
Southwark St John 4 32.47x
Stranton 4 9.91x
Tunstall 4 67.00x
Bournmoor 3 159.57x
Brancepeth 3 137.61x
Mickley 3 158.73x
Monkseaton 3 447.76x
Newcastle On Tyne All Sts 3 8.38x
Rawcliffe In York 3 2500.00x
Thorney 3 106.01x
Tynemouth 3 9.35x
Boldon 2 46.84x
Bow London 2 3.90x
Manchester 2 0.93x
Rotherhithe 2 4.02x
St Giles 2 26.74x
Westoe 2 2.94x
Brandon Byshottles 1 6.66x
Chiswick 1 4.54x
Derby St Peter 1 4.98x
Derby St Werburgh 1 2.75x
Devonport 1 10.37x
Gainford 1 80.65x
Gilling 1 83.33x
Heddon On Wall 1 136.99x
Hornsey 1 1.96x
Horton Kirby 1 46.95x
Morton Grange 1 370.37x
Oldham 1 0.65x
Scarborough 1 2.76x
Shotton 1 33.78x
St George Hanover 1 1.90x
St Martin Lincoln 1 16.72x
St Nicholas Lincoln 1 16.23x
Sunderland 1 4.72x
Swinhope 1 526.32x
Whitburn 1 35.84x
Woking 1 8.45x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Scorer surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 38
Elizabeth 23
Ann 15
Jane 9
Isabella 8
Margaret 7
Sarah 7
Ellen 6
Hannah 6
Dorothy 5
Annie 4
Frances 4
Susan 4
Amy 3
Anne 3
Caroline 3
Catherine 3
Eleanor 3
Alice 2
Edith 2
Eliza 2
Fanny 2
Mabel 2
Maria 2
Martha 2
Anna 1
Betsy 1
Caraline 1
Constantia 1
Dora 1
Eleaner 1
Elizth. 1
Elizth.Orange 1
Emma 1
Florimer 1
Francis 1
Georgina 1
Hanaah 1
Henretta 1
Henry 1
Isabel 1
Jennie 1
Jessie 1
Julia 1
Kate 1
Lillian 1
Lizzie 1
Lydia 1
Margt.H. 1
Vilettor 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Scorer surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 29
Thomas 27
John 19
George 18
Charles 17
James 13
Henry 12
Robert 11
Ralph 8
Anthony 4
Alfred 3
Joseph 3
Peter 3
Richard 3
Thos. 3
Christopher 2
Frank 2
Hunter 2
Samuel 2
Thornton 2
Whitfield 2
Abbot 1
Abraham 1
Albert 1
Alexander 1
Arthur 1
David 1
Edgar 1
Francis 1
Frederick 1
Fredric 1
Geo.Oakley 1
Harry 1
Jas. 1
Jno. 1
Lancelot 1
Martin 1
Matthew 1
Nicholas 1
Norman 1
Ridley 1
Robson 1
Roseby 1
Shafto 1
Thos.Reynolds 1
Tom 1
Wilkinson 1
Wm. 1

FAQ

Scorer surname: questions and answers

How common was the Scorer surname in 1881?

In 1881, 413 people were recorded with the Scorer surname. That placed it at #7,794 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Scorer surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 940 in 2016. That gives Scorer a modern rank of #6,094.

What does the Scorer map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Scorer bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.