NameCensus.

UK surname

Seeby

In the 1881 census there were 32 people recorded with the Seeby surname, ranking it #29,082 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 106, ranked #29,927, down from #29,082 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Woburn, Trumpington and Sturminster Newton Castle. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Dacorum, St Albans and Telford and Wrekin.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Seeby is 113 in 2015. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 231.3%.

1881 census count

32

Ranked #29,082

Modern count

106

2016, ranked #29,927

Peak year

2015

113 bearers

Map years

3

1891 to 2016

Key insights

  • Seeby had 32 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #29,082 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 106 in 2016, ranked #29,927.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 107 in 1891.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Challenged Communities.

Seeby surname distribution map

The map shows where the Seeby surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Seeby surname density by area, 2016 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Seeby over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 24 #29,038
1861 historical 61 #26,170
1881 historical 32 #29,082
1891 historical 107 #22,967
1901 historical 59 #27,609
1911 historical 70 #25,853
1997 modern 109 #25,650
1998 modern 108 #26,417
1999 modern 112 #26,044
2000 modern 100 #27,695
2001 modern 98 #27,672
2002 modern 103 #27,443
2003 modern 103 #27,234
2004 modern 99 #28,136
2005 modern 99 #28,177
2006 modern 98 #28,621
2007 modern 99 #28,852
2008 modern 101 #28,825
2009 modern 104 #28,982
2010 modern 103 #29,780
2011 modern 103 #29,589
2012 modern 103 #29,733
2013 modern 106 #29,740
2014 modern 107 #29,827
2015 modern 113 #28,645
2016 modern 106 #29,927

Geography

Back to top

Where Seebys are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Woburn, Trumpington, Sturminster Newton Castle, Ware (Ware). Hertford St John, Hertford All Saints and Leicester St Margaret and Bishop's Fee, Leicester All Saints, Blackfriars. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Dacorum, St Albans and Telford and Wrekin. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Woburn Bedfordshire
2 Trumpington Cambridgeshire
3 Sturminster Newton Castle Dorset
4 Ware (Ware). Hertford St John, Hertford All Saints Hertfordshire
5 Leicester St Margaret and Bishop's Fee, Leicester All Saints, Blackfriars Leicestershire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Dacorum 008 Dacorum
2 St Albans 009 St Albans
3 Telford and Wrekin 018 Telford and Wrekin
4 St Albans 004 St Albans
5 St Albans 017 St Albans

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Seeby

These lists show first names that appear often with the Seeby surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Seeby

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Seeby, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Baseline UK

Group

Challenged Communities

Nationally, the Seeby surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Challenged Communities, within Baseline UK. This does not mean every Seeby household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Residents of these neighbourhoods typically live in households with dependent children, and there are fewer-than-average residents of normal retirement age or over. Identification with ethnic minorities, particularly Black, or Mixed or Multiple ethnicities is common. The rate of Christian religious affiliation is low. Housing predominantly consists of semi-detached houses, along with a significant number of terraced properties and flats. Overcrowded social housing is common, and private renting occurs at average UK levels. Those in employment work mainly in caring leisure and other services; process, plant and machine operation; or elementary occupations. Unemployment is high, and few individuals have degree level qualifications. Many of these neighbourhoods occur in commuter towns or less accessible areas of larger towns and cities.

Wider pattern

This Supergroup exemplifies the broad base to the UK’s social structure, encompassing as it does the average or modal levels of many neighbourhood characteristics, including all housing tenures, a range of levels of educational attainment and religious affiliations, and a variety of pre-retirement age structures. Yet, in combination, these mixes are each distinctive of the parts of the UK. Overall, terraced houses and flats are the most prevalent, as is employment in intermediate or low-skilled occupations. However, this Supergroup is also characterised by above average levels of unemployment and lower levels of use of English as the main language. Many neighbourhoods occur in south London and the UK’s other major urban centres.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Young Families and Mainstream Employment

Group

Social Rented Sector and Diverse Origins

Within London, Seeby is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector and Diverse Origins, part of Young Families and Mainstream Employment. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Scattered across London’s Inner and Outer suburbs, residents of these neighbourhoods are typically housed in the social rented sector. Although terraced and semi-detached houses predominate, more residents live in flats than elsewhere in the Supergroup. Neighbourhoods are more ethnically diverse than the Supergroup average. Those identifying as of Bangladeshi, Pakistani and some Black ethnicities are more prevalent. Europeans born in a overseas non-EU countries make up more of the lower proportion of residents identifying as White. Few residents are very old (85+). Employment in distribution, hotels and restaurants is more common than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

Many families in these neighbourhoods have young children. Housing is principally in the social rented sector, in terraced or semi-detached units. While over-all residential densities are low, overcrowding is also prevalent locally. Residents are drawn from a range of ethnic minorities, with many identifying as Black and above average numbers born in Africa. Numbers identifying as of Chinese, Indian or White ethnicity are below average. Levels of proficiency in English are below average. Levels of separation or divorce and incidence of disability are both above average. Education is typically limited to Level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. Few residents work in professional or managerial occupations but the employment structure is otherwise diverse: it includes skilled trades, caring, leisure and other service occupations, sales and customer service occupations, construction, and work as process, plant, and machine operatives.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Seeby is most concentrated in decile 3 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the less healthy end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

3
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Seeby falls in decile 4 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

4
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Seeby is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of Over 70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

10
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Seeby, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Seeby families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Seeby surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Cambridgeshire leads with 9 Seebys recorded in 1881 and an index of 45.55x.

County Total Index
Cambridgeshire 9 45.55x
Berkshire 8 34.16x
Leicestershire 5 14.46x
Lincolnshire 5 10.02x
Surrey 2 1.32x
Hertfordshire 1 4.65x
Middlesex 1 0.32x
Sussex 1 1.90x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Sandhurst in Berkshire leads with 8 Seebys recorded in 1881 and an index of 1777.78x.

Place Total Index
Sandhurst 8 1777.78x
Trumpington 7 7000.00x
Leicester St Margaret 5 59.24x
Spalding 5 505.05x
Grantchester 2 1666.67x
Lambeth 2 7.35x
Hammersmith London 1 13.00x
Hove 1 43.29x
Wormley 1 1250.00x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Seeby surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Eliza 3
Elizabeth 2
Annie 1
Emma 1
Esther 1
Frances 1
Jane 1
Maria 1
Mary 1
Matha 1
Rachel 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Seeby surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top occupations

Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in Seeby households.

FAQ

Seeby surname: questions and answers

How common was the Seeby surname in 1881?

In 1881, 32 people were recorded with the Seeby surname. That placed it at #29,082 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Seeby surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 106 in 2016. That gives Seeby a modern rank of #29,927.

What does the Seeby map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Seeby bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.