NameCensus.

UK surname

Sheraton

In the 1881 census there were 150 people recorded with the Sheraton surname, ranking it #15,489 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 205, ranked #19,250, down from #15,489 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside, Lenton, Radford, Papplewick, Nuthall, Greasley, Brewhouse Yard and London parishes. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Sunderland, County Durham and Middlesbrough.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Sheraton is 220 in 2011. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 36.7%.

1881 census count

150

Ranked #15,489

Modern count

205

2016, ranked #19,250

Peak year

2011

220 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Sheraton had 150 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #15,489 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 205 in 2016, ranked #19,250.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 190 in 1891.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Young Families in Industrial Towns.

Sheraton surname distribution map

The map shows where the Sheraton surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Sheraton surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Sheraton over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 140 #13,593
1861 historical 147 #15,539
1881 historical 150 #15,489
1891 historical 190 #15,486
1901 historical 175 #16,469
1911 historical 186 #15,643
1997 modern 201 #17,564
1998 modern 214 #17,366
1999 modern 216 #17,364
2000 modern 208 #17,772
2001 modern 199 #17,996
2002 modern 206 #17,966
2003 modern 194 #18,463
2004 modern 197 #18,368
2005 modern 191 #18,707
2006 modern 193 #18,675
2007 modern 197 #18,669
2008 modern 199 #18,699
2009 modern 208 #18,551
2010 modern 216 #18,492
2011 modern 220 #18,096
2012 modern 206 #18,837
2013 modern 206 #19,153
2014 modern 204 #19,439
2015 modern 206 #19,208
2016 modern 205 #19,250

Geography

Back to top

Where Sheratons are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside, Lenton, Radford, Papplewick, Nuthall, Greasley, Brewhouse Yard, London parishes, Hartlepool and Stranton. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Sunderland, County Durham, Middlesbrough and Ribble Valley. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside Durham
2 Lenton, Radford, Papplewick, Nuthall, Greasley, Brewhouse Yard Nottinghamshire
3 London parishes London 3
4 Hartlepool Durham
5 Stranton Durham

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Sunderland 008 Sunderland
2 Sunderland 031 Sunderland
3 County Durham 026 County Durham
4 Middlesbrough 011 Middlesbrough
5 Ribble Valley 002 Ribble Valley

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Sheraton

These lists show first names that appear often with the Sheraton surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Sheraton

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Sheraton, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce

Group

Young Families in Industrial Towns

Nationally, the Sheraton surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Young Families in Industrial Towns, within Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce. This does not mean every Sheraton household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These neighbourhoods house predominantly young, UK-born individuals identifying with a White ethnic group with dependent children. Long-term disability and unpaid care are prevalent, and religious affiliations are uncommon. Housing is terraced or semi-detached and social rented sector housing is the norm. Unemployment is above the Supergroup average, and employment is principally in elementary occupations, as process plant and machine operatives, or in caring and leisure services. Educational attainment is low. The group is scattered throughout former industrial towns in the Midlands and the South Wales Valleys.

Wider pattern

Living in terraced or semi-detached houses, residents of these neighbourhoods typically lack high levels of education and work in elementary or routine service occupations. Unemployment is above average. Residents are predominantly born in the UK, and residents are also predominantly from ethnic minorities. Social (but not private sector) rented sector housing is common. This Supergroup is found throughout the UK’s conurbations and industrial regions but is also an integral part of smaller towns.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs

Group

Professional Periphery

Within London, Sheraton is most associated with areas classed as Professional Periphery, part of Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These neighbourhoods predominantly house residents aged 45+, with many aged 85+. Most employed residents work in senior roles, and relatively few work in unskilled jobs. Terraced housing is comparatively rare, but communal living is more common. More residents identify as of Indian ethnicity and more affiliate with non-Christian religions. Disability levels are below the Supergroup average.

Wider London pattern

The age distribution of these neighbourhoods is skewed towards the middle-aged and old, although few residents live alone or in communal establishments and numbers of dependent children are around average. Owner occupation is the norm, as is residence in detached or semi-detached houses. Residential densities are low and many households have spare rooms. Most residents were born in the UK and, aside from some identifying as members of Chinese or Indian ethnicities, identify as White. Mixed ethnicity households are rare. Incidence of married couples is higher than average and few individuals have never been married. A large proportion of individuals still in employment work in administrative and secretarial occupations, or in the construction industry. Few residents are students, and many households own more than one car.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Sheraton is most concentrated in decile 9 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

9
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Sheraton falls in decile 1 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

1
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Sheraton is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Sheraton, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Sheraton families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Sheraton surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Durham leads with 81 Sheratons recorded in 1881 and an index of 18.61x.

County Total Index
Durham 81 18.61x
Essex 8 2.77x
Cheshire 7 2.17x
Glamorgan 6 2.36x
Lancashire 6 0.35x
Middlesex 6 0.41x
Nottinghamshire 6 3.04x
Yorkshire 6 0.41x
Cardiganshire 5 14.01x
Leicestershire 5 3.08x
Northumberland 4 1.84x
Shropshire 4 3.16x
Norfolk 3 1.33x
Derbyshire 2 0.87x
Sussex 1 0.41x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Bishopwearmouth in Durham leads with 35 Sheratons recorded in 1881 and an index of 93.68x.

Place Total Index
Bishopwearmouth 35 93.68x
Chester Le Street 9 269.46x
Ryhope 8 264.90x
Stranton 8 54.61x
West Ham 8 12.55x
Higher Bebington 7 338.16x
Ashton Under Lyne 6 15.81x
Radford 6 59.88x
Leicester St Margaret 5 12.64x
Llancarvan 5 1785.71x
Stockton On Tees 5 23.83x
Vainor Lower 5 1666.67x
Ellesmere 4 184.33x
Elswick 4 23.03x
Fulham London 4 18.85x
Cornforth 3 234.38x
Tilney St Lawrence 3 833.33x
Dawdon 2 37.38x
Derby St Werburgh 2 15.12x
Hampstead London 2 8.78x
Hartlepool 2 32.31x
Hylton 2 259.74x
Middlesbrough 2 10.59x
Seaham 2 125.79x
Sedgefield 2 129.03x
Sutton 2 121.21x
Brighton 1 2.01x
Linthorpe 1 11.56x
Penarth 1 40.16x
Sadberge 1 526.32x
Sherburn 1 75.76x
Sunderland 1 13.00x
Whitby 1 20.45x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Sheraton surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 13
Jane 9
Elizabeth 8
Emma 4
Margaret 4
Anne 3
Elizth. 3
Hannah 3
Ann 2
Charlotte 2
Eleanor 2
Frances 2
Isabella 2
Agnes 1
Alice 1
Amy 1
Arabella 1
Beatrice 1
Clara 1
Eliza 1
Elizth.E. 1
Ellen 1
Ellenor 1
Fanny 1
Florence 1
Hilda 1
Isabell 1
Jennet 1
Kate 1
Margret 1
Maria 1
Martha 1
Maud 1
Minnie 1
Sarah 1
Thomasine 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Sheraton surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

FAQ

Sheraton surname: questions and answers

How common was the Sheraton surname in 1881?

In 1881, 150 people were recorded with the Sheraton surname. That placed it at #15,489 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Sheraton surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 205 in 2016. That gives Sheraton a modern rank of #19,250.

What does the Sheraton map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Sheraton bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.