NameCensus.

UK surname

Shillabeer

In the 1881 census there were 196 people recorded with the Shillabeer surname, ranking it #13,006 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 270, ranked #15,913, down from #13,006 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Dartmorth St Petrox, Dartmouth St Saviour, Townstall, Ashprington, Halwell, Blackawton, Stoke Flemin, London parishes and Totnes. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include South Hams, Plymouth and Gravesham.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Shillabeer is 300 in 1999. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 37.8%.

1881 census count

196

Ranked #13,006

Modern count

270

2016, ranked #15,913

Peak year

1999

300 bearers

Map years

8

1861 to 2016

Key insights

  • Shillabeer had 196 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #13,006 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 270 in 2016, ranked #15,913.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 298 in 1901.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Rural Amenity.

Shillabeer surname distribution map

The map shows where the Shillabeer surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Shillabeer surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Shillabeer over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 93 #17,946
1861 historical 125 #17,678
1881 historical 196 #13,006
1891 historical 232 #13,429
1901 historical 298 #11,695
1911 historical 297 #11,524
1997 modern 291 #13,792
1998 modern 289 #14,208
1999 modern 300 #13,958
2000 modern 291 #14,200
2001 modern 290 #14,033
2002 modern 289 #14,341
2003 modern 296 #13,944
2004 modern 281 #14,489
2005 modern 282 #14,368
2006 modern 283 #14,432
2007 modern 288 #14,428
2008 modern 281 #14,782
2009 modern 278 #15,230
2010 modern 274 #15,705
2011 modern 273 #15,606
2012 modern 263 #15,954
2013 modern 272 #15,836
2014 modern 275 #15,831
2015 modern 269 #15,955
2016 modern 270 #15,913

Geography

Back to top

Where Shillabeers are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Dartmorth St Petrox, Dartmouth St Saviour, Townstall, Ashprington, Halwell, Blackawton, Stoke Flemin, London parishes, Totnes, Ashburton and Harberton. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to South Hams, Plymouth, Gravesham, South Somerset and Doncaster. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Dartmorth St Petrox, Dartmouth St Saviour, Townstall, Ashprington, Halwell, Blackawton, Stoke Flemin Devon
2 London parishes London 3
3 Totnes Devon
4 Ashburton Devon
5 Harberton Devon

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 South Hams 007 South Hams
2 Plymouth 017 Plymouth
3 Gravesham 002 Gravesham
4 South Somerset 004 South Somerset
5 Doncaster 013 Doncaster

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Shillabeer

These lists show first names that appear often with the Shillabeer surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Shillabeer

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Shillabeer, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Rural Amenity

Nationally, the Shillabeer surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Rural Amenity, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Shillabeer household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group comprises older parents or retirees, with no resident dependent children, and with the lowest residential densities in this Supergroup. Predominantly UK-born, residents typically live in detached houses, although others do live in semi-detached and terraced properties. The level of multiple car ownership is the highest in this Supergroup. Most houses are owner occupied although social renting is also present. Many concentrations occur in high amenity rural locations, such as Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Social Rented Sector Families with Children

Group

Social Rented Sector Pockets

Within London, Shillabeer is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector Pockets, part of Social Rented Sector Families with Children. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Found in pockets across London, residents are less likely to live in private sector rentals and fewer adults are students. Fewer individuals work in transport and communications occupations relative to the Supergroup average. More individuals identify as Black and were born in Africa.

Wider London pattern

Residents of these neighbourhoods include sizable numbers identifying with ethnicities originating outside Europe, particularly in Africa or Bangladesh. The proportion of residents identifying as White, Indian or Pakistani is well below the London average. Neighbourhood age profiles are skewed towards younger adults, and above average numbers of families have children. Rates of use of English at home are below average. Marriage rates are low, and levels of separation or divorce are above average. Housing is predominantly in flats, and renting in the social rented sector the norm - few residents are owner occupiers. Housing is often overcrowded, and neighbourhoods are amongst the most densely populated in London. Disability rates are above average, although levels of unpaid care provision are about average. Employment is in caring, leisure, other service occupations, sales and customer service, or process, plant, and machine operation. Part time working and full-time student study are common. Levels of unemployment are slightly above average. Most residents have only Level 1 or 2 educational qualifications or have completed apprenticeships.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Shillabeer is most concentrated in decile 9 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

9
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Shillabeer falls in decile 10 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the less deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

10
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Shillabeer is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 50-60 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

8
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Shillabeer, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Shillabeer families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Shillabeer surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Devon leads with 148 Shillabeers recorded in 1881 and an index of 36.44x.

County Total Index
Devon 148 36.44x
Middlesex 21 1.08x
Hampshire 11 2.75x
Kent 10 1.50x
Somerset 3 0.96x
Channel Islands 2 3.46x
Royal Navy 2 8.60x
Surrey 1 0.11x
Sussex 1 0.30x
Yorkshire 1 0.05x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Ashburton in Devon leads with 26 Shillabeers recorded in 1881 and an index of 1340.21x.

Place Total Index
Ashburton 26 1340.21x
Plymouth Charles The 25 139.74x
Plymstock 19 892.02x
Chelsea London 11 18.71x
Totnes 11 462.18x
East Stonehouse 10 125.00x
Gillingham 10 72.89x
Southampton St Mary 8 31.81x
Ugborough 8 816.33x
Edmonton 6 38.17x
Harberton 6 652.17x
South Brent 6 689.66x
Brixton 5 1086.96x
Stokefleming 5 980.39x
Ashprington 4 1333.33x
Rattery 4 1538.46x
St Andrew Undershaft 4 1818.18x
Bridgewater 3 35.17x
Plymouth St Andrew 3 9.59x
Plympton St Mary 3 127.66x
Southampton Holy Rood 3 750.00x
Buckland Monachorum 2 229.89x
Diptford 2 454.55x
Royal Navy 2 10.07x
Chichester All Sts 1 454.55x
Chudleigh 1 77.52x
Clifford Cum Boston 1 57.47x
Compton Gifford 1 78.74x
Dodbrooke 1 123.46x
Ermington 1 67.57x
Kingsbridge 1 98.04x
Lundy Island 1 833.33x
Meavy 1 526.32x
Newington 1 1.39x
St Clement 1 113.64x
St Peter Port 1 9.35x
Wolborough 1 19.49x
Yealmpton 1 161.29x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Shillabeer surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Shillabeer surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 20
John 15
George 6
Richard 6
Samuel 5
Ernest 4
Henry 4
Robert 4
James 3
Albert 2
Charles 2
Frederick 2
Joseph 2
Alfred 1
Cecil 1
Edwin 1
Frank 1
Fred 1
Fredk. 1
Harold 1
Harry 1
Herbert 1
Horace 1
Not 1
Sidney 1
Sydney 1
Thomas 1
Walter 1
Wm.F. 1

FAQ

Shillabeer surname: questions and answers

How common was the Shillabeer surname in 1881?

In 1881, 196 people were recorded with the Shillabeer surname. That placed it at #13,006 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Shillabeer surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 270 in 2016. That gives Shillabeer a modern rank of #15,913.

What does the Shillabeer map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Shillabeer bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.